Lower Rio Grande Valley Regional Transit Service Plan

1. Lower Rio Grande Valley Regional Transit Service Plan

2. Background • 78th Legislative Session mandate • Eliminate waste in the provision of public transportation services; • Generate efficiencies that will permit increased levels of service; and • Further the state’s efforts to reduce air pollution.

3. HB 3588 cont’d • Provides for coordination by TxDOT in the provision of public transportation throughout the state, and • Authorizes the Texas Transportation Commission to adopt rules requiring state agencies to contract with TxDOT to assume responsibilities of that agency’s public transportation services.

4. Medicaid Program Development Disabilities Children & Families ? ? ? Office of Disability Employment Policy Labor Employment Training Agency Family Assistance Faith Based Transit Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Special Ed Transportation Substance Abuse Mental Health Health Care Medicare & Medicaid Svcs HHS Rural Transit Operators Family Health Resources & Services Office of the Secretary Area Agency on Aging Assistant Secretary Planning Evaluation Head Start Child Care Bureau Soc. Services Block Grant Education Private Paratransit Aging Community Services Centers for Independent Living State Governors & Cabinet Secretaries Disability Rehab and Research Rehabilitation Services Administration Employment Federal Agencies & Grant $ Education Office of Special Education Programs Shopping Local Government Recreation Medical Transit Provider Transportation Office of the Secretary Urbanized Grant Program Elderly & Disability Program Private Taxi Independence Disability Service Provider National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Federal Transit Administration Rural Grant Program Head Start ADA Paratransit Local Transportation Authority Departmental Office of Civil Rights Transportation Service Chart “United We Ride” (FTA) Job Access Reverse Commute Program Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy Transit Pass

5. Duties of TxDOT • TxDOT shall identify: • Overlaps and gaps in the provision of public transportation services; • Underused equipment owned by public transportation providers; and • Inefficiencies in the provision of public transportation services.

6. TxDOT Response to HB 3588 • TxDOT Commissioner Hope Andrade appointed statewide Study Group in December 2004; • Study group recommended each planning region develop a regional transit coordination plan.

7. Service Area Boundary TxDOT Pharr District Planning Area

8. Management Structure

9. Transportation Providers MTP VTC

10. Assistance by Planning Consultants • Enlisted assistance from TTI to develop RFP – November 2005 • Awarded Contract to KFH Group, Inc. – April 2006 • Regional Transit Plan Completed – December 2006

11. The Planning Process • Development of goals and objectives • Review of existing services and coordination activities • Demographics, land uses and travel patterns • Review of needs • Development of alternatives to address needs • Review of transit authorities • Transit Traveler Information

12. Origins, Destinations And Travel Patterns • The vast majority of residences and destinations are in the US Highway 83 corridor • Travel patterns indicate most work in their own areas with crossover across the 83 corridor • McAllen is the largest trip attractor with retail and other businesses

16. Summary of Issues • LRGV Region has a lesser share of commuters that use transit than the State of Texas as a whole. • The LRGV Region has three of the poorest counties in terms of average household income. Vehicle ownership in the LRGV Region is well below State and National averages. • Population in the region and in Mexico will continue to grow at a rapid pace. • The culmination of the above three facts revealed an unmet transit need in the LRGV Region and a significant opportunity for transit. • The LRGV Region does have significantly less commuters driving alone to work. • Measured by the absolute number of commuters, Hidalgo County is by far the top destination county for workers in the region.

17. Summary of Needs • The greatest needs continue to be in the Colonias spread all over Hidalgo County, with many in Willacy and Cameron Counties as well. • The continued growth in Mexico will contribute high levels of ridership in the urban systems for Brownsville and McAllen. • Harlingen – San Benito and Edinburg – Mission each has the potential demand and need for more fixed-route service within their cities. • Pan American University should be part of the solution to transit issues in Edinburg. • Willacy County has additional needs for both local service and service to Harlingen. • Increases in connectivity throughout the region will grow in importance as people spread farther out seeking employment.

18. Barriers and Constraints • Needs are very great – low incomes and residents of Mexico contribute to this level of need. • Duplication of effort - Multiple transit operators each representing their own constituents, creates institutional resistance to change – turf protection. • Fragmented ITS structure • Medicaid is not coordinated, creating another transit provider • Driver pay rates vary, causing problems

19. Potential for A Transit Authority • There are three models that can work in the region: • Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Corpus Christi) • City Transit Department (Laredo) • Coordinated County Authority (Denton) • Each is a difficult and time consuming effort • Requires at least one election • Can produce enough revenue to operate quality transit

20. Transit Traveler Information • Requires a coordinated approach with all operators • Two phase project • Coordination and implementation of one stop shopping • Interactive – purchase tickets on line, automated travel planner • Requires one entity to manage

21. Planned Activities • Coordination Activities: • Development of a Mobility Manager/Broker • Coordinating all paratransit activities • Human Service – The Mentoring Program • Permanently formalize stakeholders committee • Review the potential for a transit authority

22. Planned Activities • Service Activities: • Fixed/Flex Route Service – Harlingen-San Benito, Edinburg-Mission, expansion in McAllen and Brownsville • Expanded, coordinated main line service • Feeder Service - • Fixed Schedule Service – lower density • Paratransit • Shopper Shuttles • Through Ticketing and Coordinated Fares • Sponsorship program

24. Service Assumptions • Population Growth • Target Colonias • Accounting for Ridership from Mexico • Funding Issues • Public/Private Partnership • Mobility Management • Coordination Efforts • Coordination Must Make Business Sense • Fixed/Flex Route and Other Scheduled Service • Use of Technology

25. What’s Next… • TxDOT has awarded additional funding to continue the planning effort • Transit Advisory Panel will oversee the implementation of projects in the region • Some of the coordination/service activities are already being implemented • Continue to use planning consultant to market the plan with city, county and other local elected officials

26. Copies of the LRGV Regional Coordination Plan available from: www.kfhgroup.com/LRGV Questions or Comments