1 / 9

Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) 345 kV Project

Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) 345 kV Project. Lower Rio Grande Valley 345 kV Project. AEPSC Proposal

velika
Download Presentation

Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) 345 kV Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) 345 kV Project

  2. Lower Rio Grande Valley 345 kV Project • AEPSC Proposal • Construct a new 148 mile, 345kV transmission line from Laredo Lobo to Rio Bravo to Del Sol, a new 345kV switching station on the west side of the LRGV, utilizing 2-954 ACSR conductor on double-circuit capable structures, and a 24 ohm 3600 amp series capacitor on the Lobo 345 kV circuit • Construct a new 15 mile, 345kV transmission line from Del Sol to North Edinburg utilizing 2-954 ACSR conductor on double-circuit capable structures • Construct a new 15 mile, 345kV transmission line from Del Sol to Frontera utilizing 2-954 ACSR conductor on double-circuit capable structures • Estimated to cost approximately $380 million RPG Meeting

  3. Study models & Criteria • 2016 Summer Peak base case based on the latest (April 28, 2010) 2011 SSWG Data set B • 2020 Summer Peak base case based on the DOE 2020 Long-term study • Two wind farms with recent signed generator interconnections added to the base case and dispatched @ 10% capacity: • Los Vientos 400 MW Wind in Cameron County • Magic Valley 200 MW Wind in Willacy County • Silas Ray unit 5 turned off • Contingencies: • the loss of a transmission line, with the largest LRGV generation station out of service. (N-1 + G-1) for reliability criteria • the loss of a transmission line, with the prior outage (maintenance outage) of a transmission line (N-1-1) will be studied to determine the transfer capability but not used as a reliability criteria RPG Meeting

  4. Project Options studied for 2016 • Option 1 - AEPSC proposal • Option 2 - AEPSC proposal with 600/750 MVA 345 kV, ± 48º Phase shifting transformer • Option 3 – Construct approximately 145 mile, 345kV transmission line from Laredo Lobo to North Edinburg, utilizing 2-954 ACSR conductor on double-circuit capable structures with 600/750 MVA 345 kV, ± 48º Phase shifting transformer • Option 4 – Construct approximately ~ 200 mile, 345kV transmission line from San Miguel to North Edinburg, utilizing 2-954 ACSR conductor on double-circuit capable structures with 50% Series Compensation • Option 5 – Construct approximately ~ 200 mile, 345kV transmission line from Pawnee to North Edinburg, utilizing 2-954 ACSR conductor on double-circuit capable structures with 50% Series Compensation RPG Meeting

  5. 2016 Study Results for N-1 + G-1 LRGV Load MW * Load forecasts do not include the 250 MW new load in Brownsville RPG Meeting

  6. Project Options studied for 2020 • Option 1A – Option 1 + Re-conductor both Lon Hill – North Edinburg 345 kV and Nelson Sharpe – Ajo – Rio Hondo 345 kV • Option 3A – Option 3 + Re-conductor both Lon Hill – North Edinburg 345 kV and Nelson Sharpe – Ajo – Rio Hondo 345 kV Re-Conductor • Option 5A – Option 5 + Re-conductor both Lon Hill – North Edinburg 345 kV and Nelson Sharpe – Ajo – Rio Hondo 345 kV • Option 3_5 – Option 3 + Option 5 RPG Meeting

  7. 2020 Study Results for N-1 + G-1 LRGV Load MW * Load forecasts do not include the 250 MW new load in Brownsville RPG Meeting

  8. Other Options and Considerations • Evaluate the optimal location for the PST (for option 2 and 3) • Study PST options for the existing 345 kV line in the Valley • HVDC line from Pawnee • Obtain cost estimates for the different options and determine the feasibility of construction to meet the projected load growth • Evaluate the different options to assess the impact on the local area constraints/mitigation RPG Meeting

  9. Questions? March 12, 2010 RPG Meeting

More Related