1 / 26

Psychology 317 Chapter 16

Psychology 317 Chapter 16. Prevention of Substance Abuse. Prevention of Substance Abuse. Benjamin Rush, first Surgeon General, initiated perhaps first drug education program to school individuals on detriments of alcohol.

kaemon
Download Presentation

Psychology 317 Chapter 16

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Psychology 317 Chapter 16 Prevention of Substance Abuse

  2. Prevention of Substance Abuse • Benjamin Rush, first Surgeon General, initiated perhaps first drug education program to school individuals on detriments of alcohol. • At the beginning of the 20th century Public Health Authorities eliminated many public health services but not drug abuse. • This has been attributed to the following: • Large numbers of Americans use and get satisfaction from drug use (especially tobacco and alcohol). • Most drugs provide immediate gratification; valued quality in US. • Alcohol and cigarette manufacturers hindered drug prevention efforts by promoting them and by making large political contributions. • Americans do not like being told what to do (Prohibition, Reactance).

  3. Prevention of Substance Abuse continued • In the past drug prevention efforts focused on heroin, LSD and cocaine. • Recently attention has shifted to alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, & methamphetamine. • Many experts believe that prevention efforts should focus on the causes of drug abuse: poverty, homelessness, poor education, inadequate health care. • It is difficult to assess success of prevention programs because there is no standard definition of prevention and programs do not have common goals.

  4. Definition of Prevention • Prevention defined broadly is avoidance or alleviation of problems associated with substance use. • Most agree that prevention should be an important part of any comprehensive substance abuse program. • But most professionals and funding sources have not made prevention a high priority . • Traditionally, there has been 3 types of prevention programs: primary, secondary, tertiary.

  5. Definition of Prevention continued • Primary prevention – Directed at individuals who have never used drugs. • Pertains to avoidance of substance abuse before use begins (Just-Say-No) • Development of responsible attitudes and substance use behavior. (Not driving after drinking or allowing friends to do so)

  6. Definition of Prevention continued • Secondary prevention- Interventions applied when problems are first appearing/surfacing. • Frequently used in legal response to drug use- DUI • Individuals ordered to alcohol education classes • Young offenders with first arrest for drug possession ordered to education programs • Emphasis is on nipping drug use problem in the bud

  7. Definition of Prevention continued • Tertiary prevention- Intervention used to treat persons beyond early stages of drug abuse • Goal is to terminate use to prevent further deterioration of functioning. • Similar to substance abuse treatment and thus not really prevention.

  8. Models of Prevention • Research over the years has led to the development of 3 major prevention models: Sociocultural, Distribution of Consumption, & Proscriptive.

  9. Sociocultural Model • Sociocultural model is probably most dominant in US. • It states that social norms directly influence drug use and drug abuse. • Thus prevention efforts should be directed at the cultural climate of drug use.

  10. Sociocultural Model continued • Applied to drinking, the model has 3 components: • Emphasis on normative cultural structure • Need to integrate drinking into socially meaningful activities • Emphasis on providing gradual socialization of drinking behavior

  11. Sociocultural Model continued • Rupert Wilkinson (1970) is one of the strongest proponents. • He identified 5 proposals for modifying cultural drinking - Need for low level of emotionalism about drinking coupled with no ambivalence about alcohol use. - Distinction between drinking and drunkenness. - Firm taboo on drunkenness after identifying what drunkenness is.

  12. Sociocultural Model continued • Integrating alcohol consumption in broader social context. It should be adjunctive to other activities and not the focus of activity. • Serving alcohol only when food is available • Makes it not sole focus of activity • Food slows alcohol absorption and thus rate of drunkenness • Sociocultural approach does not advocate abstinence • This is major sources of criticism

  13. Sociocultural Model continued • Sociocultural approach advocates responsible use not no use of alcohol, but when applied to hard drug use, it advocates no use.

  14. Distribution of Consumption Approach • Distribution of Consumption approach proposes • Proportion of heavy drinkers in a culture is positively related to mean alcohol consumption. • The heavier the alcohol consumption the greater the probability of alcohol problems. • Negative consequences of drinking can be reduced by reducing alcohol consumption across the culture.

  15. Distribution of Consumption Approach continued • Approach developed by Frenchman, Sully Ledermann in 1950’s. • To address #1 he proposed reduction in per capita alcohol consumption. • To address #2 he proposed reducing population’s mean consumption which will reduce mental/emotional, physical, & social problems caused by alcohol.

  16. Distribution of Consumption Approach continued • To address #3 he proposed restricting alcohol availability by raising price relative to disposable income, limiting bar and tavern hours, controlling retail sales, raising minimum drinking age.

  17. Distribution of Consumption Approach continued • Criticisms include: the model is purely descriptive & provides no insight into reason(s) for drinking; • Normal drinkers may respond differently from heavy drinkers to reduced alcohol availability; • Heavy drinkers less likely to respond to price increase & policies to decrease per capita drinking.

  18. Proscriptive Model • Proscriptive approach focuses on prohibition and emphasizes abstention from drug use. • If there is no drug use there is no societal problem. If a person uses, it is not societal problem but character flaw of person. • This model has been applied to alcohol and other drug use. • For decades proscriptive model has been applied to marijuana & heroin, & recently, cocaine and methamphetamine use.

  19. Proscriptive Model continued • Key to this model is “Good” people do not use drugs. • Criticisms include results of prohibition in US during 1920’s and 1930’s.

  20. Principles of Abuse Prevention • Most common drug abuse prevention interventions have been education & mass media use. • Most states require alcohol & drug education in school curricula. • NIDA (2003) published a series of “prevention principles” to be implemented in prevention programs for children and adolescents. (See Table 16.1)

  21. Principles of Abuse Prevention • The principles fall under 3 broad domains • 1. Risk & protective factors • 2. Planning and prevention programs • 3. Actual delivery of prevention programs • (See Table 16.1)

  22. Current Topics in Prevention • The most noteworthy trend in prevention activities today are: • Increasing involvement in prevention programs. • Attention to developing resistance skills, specifically strategies to avoid pressures to use drug. • Developing community broad based programs like school-based intervention with mass media communication outlets. • Identifying and developing programs for high at risk groups for alcohol and drug misuse. (eg. Inner city youths, Native American youth, minority youth and college students). • Focusing attention on “gate way” drugs- tobacco, alcohol, marijuana.

  23. Current Topics in Prevention continued • Increasing attention to programs designed to minimize risk or negative consequences associated with any substance use that occurs. • Alcohol and drug education courses have generally been shown to increase knowledge levels but have not been as successful in changing drug use patterns. • Recently there has been an increase in parent involvement in prevention programs especially those involving their children.

  24. Current Topics in Prevention continued • Mass media campaigns seem to increase knowledge of awareness of drugs but not drug-use behavior. • In recent years prevention programs with resistance-training approach have received much attention. • Resistance-training programs trains young people to recognize and resist pressures to use drugs.

  25. Current Topics in Prevention continued • Majority of Fortune 500 companies, plus others, have established worksite programs. • Substance use among employees cost businesses approximately $246 billion annually. • About 60% of cases are due to alcohol use. • Employers find it less expensive to treat workers than to train new workers. • Goal is to identify drug abusing employees early and intervene when drug problem interferes with job performance.

  26. Current Topics in Prevention continued • These programs are called EAP (employee assistance programs) and are secondary prevention programs. • A variety of prevention programs have been established on college campuses. • These programs are aimed primarily at alcohol use. • A 2002 Task Force of National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism developed an overview of consequences of alcohol misuse by college students. (See Table 16.2). • The Task Force listed 12 staggering consequences of alcohol use by college students. (See Table 16.2) • Full potential of prevention intervention not yet tested. • More resources from state and federal agencies are needed to do so.

More Related