1 / 17

NOAA-18 Instrument Calibration and Validation Briefing

NOAA-18 Instrument Calibration and Validation Briefing . NOAA/NESDIS/Office of Research and Applications July 6, 2005 For archived activities and latest news, please visit http://www.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/smcd/spb/n18calval.

justis
Download Presentation

NOAA-18 Instrument Calibration and Validation Briefing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NOAA-18 Instrument Calibration and Validation Briefing NOAA/NESDIS/Office of Research and Applications July 6, 2005 For archived activities and latest news, please visit http://www.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/smcd/spb/n18calval

  2. Mitch Goldberg: ORA/SMCD Division Chief, - Management and Technical Oversight Fuzhong Weng: ORA/SMCD/Sensor Physics Branch Chief and NOAA-18 cal/val team leader, instrument asymmetry and microwave products and algorithms, radiance bias assessments for NWP model applications Changyong Cao: HIRS instrument calibration Fred Wu: AVHRR VIS/IR instrument calibration Tsan Mo: AMSU/MHS instrument calibration Jerry Sullivan: AVHRR thermal channel calibration/ NDVI validation Tony Reale: HIRS/AMSU/MHS sounding channel/products validation Mike Chalfant: HIRS/AMSU/MHS sounding channel/products validation /geolocation Ralph Ferraro: AMSU/MHS window channels/MSPPS products validation Larry Flynn: SBUV product validation Tom Kleespies: AMSU on-orbit verification Hank Drahos: Sounding product validation Dan Tarpley: AVHRR product NDVI monitoring John LeMarshall (JCSDA): Impacts assessments of NOAA-18 data for NWP applications Stephen English (UK): tests of direct readout data and NWP impacts demonstration Our Team

  3. Outline for this Brief • ORA NOAA-18 Cal/Val Activities • Current Assessments • Summary • Next Step

  4. Activities of the ORA NOAA-18 Cal/Val Team • Monitor and quantify instrument noises though analyzing calibration target counts and channel space view measurements • Assess instrument geolocation biases and co-registration and provide recommended solutions for satellite roll and pitch adjustments • Characterize other systematic biases in radiance through rigorous forward modeling and inter-satellite calibrations • Provide initial demonstration and assessments of NOAA-18 data for improving numerical weather prediction • Validate product algorithms (e.g. ATOVS and MSPPS, TOAST, UV index, NDVI, SST, AOD) for transition into operation • Communicate with NOAA-18 OV team, instrument vendors and users with timeliness diagnostics of instrument performances and provide root cause analyses

  5. Long-Term Goals of ORA’s Cal/Val Program • Develop an Integrated Cal/Val System Framework to enhance ORA’s capability and efficiency to provide outstanding calibration and validation to METOP, NPP NPOESS, and GOES-R • Outcome >>> Provide timely and accurate assessments of NOAA instrument’s on-orbit performances and the impacts of noise and loss of channels on operational products and data assimilation

  6. NOAA-18 Instrument Assessments • AVHRR/3 Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer • HIRS/4 High Resolution Infrared Sounder • AMSU-A Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit-A • MHS Microwave Humidity Sounder • SBUV/2 Solar Backscattered Ultraviolet Radiometer

  7. G G G Y Y Y R R R ORA NOAA-18 Instrument Cal/Val Status Report Support to NOAA’s Critical Satellite Program Noise, Bias and Anomaly Navigation and Co-registration Navigation errors are more than one scan lines and/or fovs and their causes have not been identified All channels do not meet the noise specification, or large unknown biases and anomaly Some channels do not meet the noise specification, no major anomaly and biases Small navigation errors which can be fixed through recommended roll and pitch adjustments All channels meet the noise specification No navigation errors NWP Readiness and Product Demo Analysis and Recommended Solutions Measurements are assessed and not ready for product and NWP applications No analyses and recommended solutions for out-of spec instrument parameters R Analysis for out-of spec parameters but solutions have not been recommended Y Some channels are assessed and may be useful for product and NWP applications Analysis and recommended solutions are proposed for out-of spec instrument parameters G Measurements are fully tested and ready for product and NWP applications

  8. G Y Y R ORA NOAA-18 HIRS/4 Cal/Val Findings Support to NOAA’s Critical Satellite Program Noise, Bias and Anomaly Navigation and Co-registration • HIRS/4 noise is fluctuating at 2-3 times the specification for most long-wave channels. • The noise among all channels is highly correlated • Space view count at channel 1 remains saturated and the noise has not been quantified • HIRS/4 geolocation has a mean shift of 3-4 AVHRR pixels, which is more related to AVHRR geolocation error NWP Readiness and Product Demo Analysis and Recommended Solutions • ORA has developed a website for real-time monitoring of noise trend • ORA had several telecons with OV team and instrument vendor to present the noise assessment results • ORA proposed several possible coherent noise generators, 1) clamp system itself, 2) interference with the clamp system or 3) through the clamp system • These root cause analyses are likely confirmed by MIT/Lincoln Lab. • Coefficients in radiative transfer model and data assimilation system are updated • Brightness temperatures at most of HIRS channels are not ready for sounding and NWP applications

  9. G Y Y R Vch V0 ORA NOAA-18 HIRS/4 Cal/Val Findings Support to NOAA’s Critical Satellite Program Noise, Bias and Anomaly Navigation and Co-registration HIRS Pixel Number NWP Readiness and Product Demo Analysis and Recommended Solutions Reference voltage for the clamp target which may be fluctuating

  10. G G G Y ORA NOAA-18 AMSU-A Cal/Val Findings Support to NOAA’s Critical Satellite Program Noise, Bias and Anomaly Navigation and Co-registration • AMSU-A noise is evaluated and shows all channels meet the specification. • Overall AMSU calibration algorithms are healthy with reasonable gains, and variability in cold and warm calibration targets • AMSU-A1 module displays a slightly larger cross-track asymmetry • AMSU-A1 is correctly navigated • AMSU-A2 is off by 0.7 MHS scanline along track and 0.36 MHS FOVs across track. Analysis and Recommended Solutions NWP Readiness and Product Demo • Coefficients in radiative transfer model and data assimilation system are updated • Impacts of AMSU on weather prediction are being assessed • AMSU microwave surface and precipitation products are demonstrated • Recommend to OV team for possible roll and pitch adjustments to AMSU-A2 module navigation errors • Recommend to OV team to investigate AMSU-A1 cross-track asymmetry with various antenna pattern correction algorithms

  11. G G G Y ORA NOAA-18 AMSU-A Cal/Val Findings Support to NOAA’s Critical Satellite Program Noise, Bias and Anomaly Navigation and Co-registration NWP Readiness and Product Demo Analysis and Recommended Solutions A1 cross-track asymmetry

  12. G G G Y ORA NOAA-18 MHS Cal/Val Findings Support to NOAA’s Critical Satellite Program Noise, Bias and Anomaly Navigation and Co-registration • Display 0.9 MHS scanline error along track • MHS noises are quantified and show all channels meet the specification and are better than AMSU-B NWP Readiness and Product Demo Analysis and Recommended Solutions • Coefficients in radiative transfer model and data assimilation system are updated • Impacts of MHS on weather prediction are being assessed • MHS microwave surface and precipitation products are demonstrated • Recommend to OV team for a possible roll adjustment to correct MHS navigation errors

  13. G G G Y ORA NOAA-18 MHS Cal/Val Findings Support to NOAA’s Critical Satellite Program Noise, Bias and Anomaly Navigation and Co-registration MHS channel 1 reveals a coast line shift along track NWP Readiness and Product Demo Analysis and Recommended Solutions A high quality of rainfall distribution from MHS

  14. ORA NOAA-18 AVHRR/3 Cal/Val Findings Support to NOAA’s Critical Satellite Program G G G Y Noise, Bias and Anomaly Navigation and Co-registration • The blackbody temperature changes are monitored and shows in a small range of variability (only 2K) • Thermal channel (3-5) calibration is healthy • Wu’s Vis/IR calibration algorithms are working well • AVHRR/3 has possible 2-3 pixels navigation errors along track NWP Readiness and Product Demo Analysis and Recommended Solutions • AVHRR/3 produces a good quality of NDVI • AVHRR/3 produces SST and aerosol optical depth with smaller biases • Recommend to OV team to have a possible roll adjustment

  15. ORA NOAA-18 AVHRR/3 Cal/Val Findings Support to NOAA’s Critical Satellite Program G G G Y Noise, Bias and Anomaly Navigation and Co-registration AVHRR NDVI product shows AVHRR has a 2-3 pixels shift in coastline along track NWP Readiness and Product Demo Analysis and Recommended Solutions NOAA-18 AVHRR derived NDVI is based on NOAA-16 vicarious calibration algorithm. This NDVI product is selected for our initial assessments of visible channel calibration because it uses both visible/near infrared channel data.

  16. Overall Summary • Most instruments are assessed under ORA cal/val project and their noises have met specification with the current exception of HIRS • Navigation and co-registration errors for all instruments are examined and quantified. The required roll and pitch adjustments are recommended to OV team • AMSU instrument cross-track biases are quantified and A1 asymmetry is being studied • NOAA-18 AVHRR NDVI product appears to be consistent with NOAA-16 • The NOAA-18 MHS NET for each channel was calculated and is better than AMSU-B by a factor of ~2 • AMSU-A/MHS hydrological parameters (rainfall, total precip. water) appear to be better quality • ORA has delivered all required software and codes to NCEP for assimilating all NOAA-18 measurements

  17. Next Step • Develop an integrated calibration and validation system for timely and accurate calibration analyses for POES instrument on-orbit performances • Validate all existing operational products: clouds, aerosol, NDVI, SST, ATOVS, MSSPS, TOAST, SBUV • Study NOAA-18 unique products improvements (e.g. HIRS 10 km sounding, MHS cloud ice and rainfall products) • Test ORA Multi-sensor Integrated Retrieval system with NOAA-18 measurements

More Related