1 / 12

9.00 – 9.10: Introduction to Day 3 9.10 – 10.10: 4 presentations: partnership challenges…

Day 3 - agenda. 9.00 – 9.10: Introduction to Day 3 9.10 – 10.10: 4 presentations: partnership challenges… 10.10 – 10.25: coffee break 10.25 – 11.30: Summary C.O. 12 month action plans 11.30 – 13.00: Action plan for Community of Practice 13.00 – 13.15: Participant feedback

john
Download Presentation

9.00 – 9.10: Introduction to Day 3 9.10 – 10.10: 4 presentations: partnership challenges…

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Day 3 - agenda 9.00 – 9.10: Introduction to Day 3 9.10 – 10.10: 4 presentations: partnership challenges… 10.10 – 10.25: coffee break 10.25 – 11.30: Summary C.O. 12 month action plans 11.30 – 13.00: Action plan for Community of Practice 13.00 – 13.15: Participant feedback 13.15 – 13.30: Conclusion of workshop 13.30: end of workshop and lunch A G E N D A

  2. Partnership Challenges Break-out group presentations: • What you consider to be the key challenges in developing business partnerships for development • Methods/ tactics to overcome these challenges, and • Further information and support needed to overcome challenges C H A L L E N G E S

  3. C.O. summary 12 month action plans Expectations: Today: - Type up draft summary 12 month action plan (into template). By end Nov: • Have discussed with RR • C.O. learning session on private sector partnerships • Quick email feeding back to regional practice how RR/ C.O. meetings went + any edits to summary 12 month C.O. action plan

  4. Break-out groups Group 1: • Armenia • BiH • Kosovo • Lithuania • Russia Group 2: • Azerbaijan • Bulgaria • Georgia • Serbia and Montenegro C H A L L E N G E S Group 3: • Belarus • Kazakhstan • Latvia • Macedonia • Ukraine Group 4: - Croatia • Kyrgyzstan • Moldova • Poland • Turkey

  5. Our ‘Community of Practice’ Area’s we might consider… Skills development/ training Internal RBEC communication/ coordination Priorities for building the RBEC C.O. Delivering joint sub-regional projects Procedures/ internal UNDP processes Coordinating our relationships with businesses N E T W O R K External UNDP communication/ coordination Assessing development impact

  6. 1. Internal RBEC communication • Day-to-day how should C.O., RBEC RBx and BRSP communicate together: • New queries: when contact RBEC? when contact BRSP? • Who within RBEC? Who within BRSP? • Information to be collected/ shared? • What do you find useful? What is not useful? • e.g. RBEC survey/ status update report • Should this be done regularly? How frequently? • What are the priority ways for us to keep in touch? • RBEC intranet – what should go on this? • RBEC newsletter? (how frequent?) • ‘RBEC business-net’ email group? • What priorities for Andrew based in New York? • How can he best act as your advocate within RBEC HQ? with BRSP? with other regional Bureaux? With BDP? Priorities for building the RBEC C.O. N E T W O R K

  7. 2. Skills development/ training • Is an RBEC regional training plan a priority? • If yes, what might an effective, yet realistic, plan look like? • Skills needed to increase UNDP effectiveness? • Training workshops going forward? • What should training courses cover? • Internal or external events? • How frequently? Who to be invited? • What, if any, role for electronic learning? • Should we develop staff exchanges? • If yes, what needs to be done? • Budget available • Prioritizing/ planning missions from BRSP/ RBEC? Priorities for building the RBEC C.O. N E T W O R K

  8. 3. Joint projects/ joint RM • Is regional/ sub-regional delivery of private sector projects a priority? • If yes, what will encourage greater cross-C.O. cooperation? • A regional/ sub-regional ‘private sector & MDGs’ event has been discussed between Kalman and Bruce Jenks: • Budget available • Possible aim: to articulate business contribution to achieving MDGs Suggestions on what this event might look like? Priorities for building the RBEC C.O. N E T W O R K

  9. 4. Procedures/ UNDP processes • Does UNDP’s standard MoU (Memorandum of Understanding) need to be developed/ improved? • If yes, how? • Does UNDP’s standard CSA (cost sharing agreement) need to be developed/ improved? • If yes, how? Priorities for building the RBEC C.O. N E T W O R K

  10. 5. Coordinating relationships with businesses • For multinationals based in several RBEC countries: • Is it a priority to co-ordinate approaches to these firms? • If yes, how might we best co-ordinate? • Do you want RBEC HQ/ BRSP to assist in developing relationships with new businesses? • Approaching multinationals with New York HQs? • See listing of New York HQed multinationals (last tab in file) • Assistance in approaching European multinationals: • Bratislava regional centre? Brussels liaison office? Geneva liaison office? UNDP Nordic? • How best to use current UNDP relationships? • SMT listing of current relationships (2nd from last tab in file) • All UNDP partnership relationships document (last tab in file) • Is a UNDP ‘Client Relationship Management’ system a priority? Priorities for building the RBEC C.O. N E T W O R K

  11. 6. External UNDP communication • Priorities for RBEC C.O. coordination and communication with: • Other UN agencies? • The wider international community? • Civil Society Organizations (CSOs)? • What should go on the new RBEC internet site? • Other creative ideas for external communication? Priorities for building the RBEC C.O. N E T W O R K

  12. 7. Assessing development impact • Business partnership projects are often not about Resource Mobilization • Is it a priority to develop new approaches that recognize the impact of business advocacy/ partnership work? • If yes, how might this be done? Priorities for building the RBEC C.O. N E T W O R K

More Related