Identification and progress monitoring at tier 3 prevent teach reinforce
1 / 86

Identification and Progress Monitoring at Tier 3: Prevent-Teach-Reinforce - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Identification and Progress Monitoring at Tier 3: Prevent-Teach-Reinforce. Presented at 2008 National Forum for Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavior Supports Rose Iovannone, Ph.D. Kathy Christiansen, MS

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

Identification and Progress Monitoring at Tier 3: Prevent-Teach-Reinforce

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Identification and progress monitoring at tier 3 prevent teach reinforce

Identification and Progress Monitoring at Tier 3: Prevent-Teach-Reinforce

Presented at 2008 National Forum for Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavior Supports

Rose Iovannone, Ph.D.

Kathy Christiansen, MS

University of South Florida



  • Participants will:

    • Describe a model of individualized behavior support

    • Identify factors that may contribute to effectiveness of PTR

The problem evidence based

The Problem—Evidence-Based

  • Tertiary supports (i.e., individualized PBS, Tier 3 behavior supports)

    • Evidence-base exists

    • Research method used primarily single subject

    • Limited rigorous, randomized control trials to evaluate effectiveness

The problem in authentic schools

The Problem - In Authentic Schools

  • Ingredients

    • Child is the problem - “fix him/her”

    • Absence of uniform policies & practices

    • Form-driven versus process-driven

    • “Expert” versus collaborative approach

    • Contextual fit not always considered

    • Limited support/follow-up/training for teacher provided

  • Result

    • Many BIPs do not get implemented

    • Behavior problems persist

Individualized pbs tertiary

For high-risk students:

History of severe problem behaviors

Demonstrated resistance to intervention

An intensive system of support is needed



Individualized PBS (Tertiary)

~ 80% of Students

What is ptr

What is PTR?

  • Research project funded by U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Science (2004-2008)

    • University of South Florida—3 school districts

    • University of Colorado, Denver—2 school districts

  • Purpose: Investigate effectiveness of PTR process vs. “business as usual”

    • Randomized control trial

    • 200 students (100 treatment/100 comparison)

Theoretical framework

Theoretical Framework

  • Principles of applied behavior analysis

    • Operant learning theory

  • Positive Behavior Support—foundation

  • Intervention consists of three core components:

    • Prevent

    • Teach

    • Reinforce

  • Team/teacher driven process



Students in K-8th grade

General or Special Education

All cognitive levels

All disabilities

Behavioral difficulties

Intensity– disruption to the learning environment

Frequency— minimum of 1 time per week

Duration– minimum 6 months

Teachers volunteered & nominated 1-3 students

Top externalizers

Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders (SSBD)



  • Prevent-Teach-Reinforce (PTR)

    • Five steps:

      • Team development—30 minutes if applicable

      • Goal setting—30-45 minutes

      • PTR assessment—30-60 minutes

      • PTR intervention—45-90 minutes

        • Coaching support (up to 12 hours)

      • Evaluation—30-40 minutes

    • Each team assigned PTR consultant (from project)

    • Teams receive manual and assigned activities to be completed in each step.

Preliminary data results

Preliminary Data Results

Student demographics by disability

Student Demographics by Disability

Student description

Student Description

The ptr process

The PTR Process

Step 1 form a team

Step 1: Form a Team

  • Identify members and their roles

    • Teacher, special area teachers

    • Behavior specialist/school psychologist

    • Family members, paraprofessionals,

Step 1 team building ensuring a successful team

Step 1: Team Building—Ensuring a Successful Team

  • Review the status of the team

    • Work styles inventory

    • Teaming survey

  • Use a collaborative process

    • Teacher and facilitator relationship

    • Consensus making method

Case study 1 mike

Case Study 1: Mike

  • 9-year-old male

  • Autism diagnosis

  • Self-contained autism classroom

  • Nonverbal—uses AAT (signs, voice output devices such as Dynamite, and pictures to communicate)

  • 1 teacher, 2 aides, and 6 students

  • Results of teaming information indicate a great team that meets regularly to brainstorm

Case study 2 jeff

Case Study 2: Jeff

  • Male

  • Second grade general ed. student

  • Retained once

  • Premature birth

  • SSBD Scores:

    • Stage 2: 8 Critical Events

    • Adaptive Behavior Score = 33

    • Maladaptive Behavior Score = 32

Teacher classroom


  • Team: Two teachers

    • Current second grade teacher

    • Second grade teacher from previous year

  • Seventeen students

  • Teacher experience—4 years at same school

Teaming results

Teaming Results

  • Team respected each other, worked together

  • Met consistently for planning purposes

  • Strong communicators and problem solvers

  • Sharing of roles and responsibilities

  • Active parental participation encouraged

Step 2 goal setting

Step 2: Goal Setting

  • Identify team consensus on:

    • Academic behavior

    • Social behavior

    • Problem behavior

  • Develop and begin baseline data collection

Setting goals mike pre test

Setting Goals: Mike Pre-Test

Behavior rating scale reliability

Behavior Rating Scale—Reliability

Perceptual rating

Behavior recorded at least once daily

May be specific to a setting, activity, time of day

May be whole day

May be combination of both

Use anchors on a scale of 1-5

Determining the anchors on the brs

Determining the Anchors on the BRS

Behavior can be measured using

Frequency (times per day)

Duration (hours, minutes, seconds)

Intensity (how hard, how loud, bruise, etc.)

Percent of day

Percent of occurrence

Percent of opportunity

Brs preliminary reliability psychometric results

BRS Preliminary Reliability (Psychometric) Results

T = Teacher rating; S = PTR data collector rating; PB = Problem behavior; AB = Appropriate behavior

* P < .01

Brs preliminary reliability results kappa scores

BRS Preliminary Reliability Results—Kappa Scores

Step 3 assessment

Step 3: Assessment

  • Checklist format:

    • Antecedents or Triggers (Prevent)

    • Function(s) of the problem behaviors (Teach)

    • Consequences following the problem behaviors (Reinforce)

  • Assists team to link function of behavior to intervention plan

Case study mike ptr assessment possible hypotheses

Case Study—Mike: PTR Assessment Possible Hypotheses



Jeff case study hypothesis

Jeff Case Study: Hypothesis

Step 4 intervention

Step 4: Intervention

  • Team ranks top three intervention strategies in each of the PTR components

  • Multi-component intervention that teacher states s/he can implement

    • Prevent

    • Teach

    • Reinforce

  • Implementation plan

Case study mike ptr intervention plan

Case Study Mike: PTR Intervention Plan

Jeff intervention checklist results

Jeff: Intervention Checklist Results

Case study jeff ptr intervention plan

Case Study Jeff: PTR Intervention Plan

Jeff intervention plan

Jeff—Intervention Plan

Jeff intervention plan1

Jeff—Intervention Plan

Jeff intervention plan2

Jeff—Intervention Plan

Jeff intervention plan3

Jeff—Intervention Plan

Coaching of interventions

Coaching of Interventions

  • Training of teacher

    • 1 to 2 hours

    • 80% accuracy on all strategies

  • Assistance in classroom

    • Up to 12 hours

  • Fidelity measures recorded

    • 80% implementation terminates assistance in classroom

Case study mike training

Case Study Mike: Training

Case study mike fidelity

Case Study Mike: Fidelity

Mike post test video

Mike Post-test Video

Coaching checklist example jeff

Coaching Checklist Example: Jeff

Example of fidelity jeff

Example of Fidelity—Jeff

Fidelity number of fidelity measures per case

Fidelity: Number of Fidelity Measures per Case

Step 5 evaluation

Step 5: Evaluation

  • Data-based decision-making

    • Identifying what is working; what is not and WHY

  • Expanding into other routines

  • Generalization

  • Continuing team meetings

    • Planning time

    • Cohesiveness

Step 5 evaluation mike

Step 5: Evaluation - Mike

1 is a lot of screaming, 5 is no screaming

Step 5 evaluation mike1

Step 5: Evaluation - Mike

1 is a lot of hitting, 5 is no hitting

Step 5 evaluation mike2

Step 5: Evaluation - Mike

1 is a little appropriate expression, 5 is a lot of appropriate expression

Step 5 evaluation mike3

Step 5: Evaluation - Mike

1 is inappropriate transition, 5 is super appropriate transition

Step 5 evaluation other outcome data

Step 5: Evaluation Other Outcome Data

Jeff data

Jeff Data

Step 5 evaluation other outcome data for jeff

Step 5: Evaluation Other Outcome Data for Jeff

Wrap up what we have learned

Wrap Up:What We Have Learned

  • Teachers like the process

  • Teachers identify coaching/support and collaboration as key features

  • Teachers do not continue the process without support

  • Systemic change may be necessary for tertiary supports to happen

How to make ptr work in your school

How to Make PTR Work in Your School

  • Process is the key

  • Creative resource reallocation may be necessary to find the time

  • Things to consider

    • Tertiary team

    • Identification/Nomination process

    • Data-based decision making

    • Facilitator

    • Set-up of meetings for efficient results

For copies of forms

For copies of Forms

  • or


  • Manual will be published by Brookes—anticipated date—Summer 09

  • Two journal articles in 2009

    • Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions (Jeff will be described)

    • Journal of Emotional Behavioral Disorders

  • Next steps:

    • Training school-based behavior consultants to do process

Http ies ed gov ncee wwc



  • Login