1 / 20

Mobile Equipment Warning Signal Detection in Noise

Mobile Equipment Warning Signal Detection in Noise. Chantal Laroche, Ph.D. A udiology-SLP Program U niversity of Ottaw a. AIHce, June 5 th New Orleans. PROBLEM. Each year, serious accidents occur in noisy workplaces because a warning sound is not heard.

joel-hewitt
Download Presentation

Mobile Equipment Warning Signal Detection in Noise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mobile Equipment Warning Signal Detection in Noise Chantal Laroche, Ph.D. Audiology-SLP Program University of Ottawa AIHce, June 5th New Orleans

  2. PROBLEM • Each year, serious accidents occur in noisy workplaces because a warning sound is not heard. • The bad perception of reverse alarms on mobile vehicles (e.g. dump trucks, forklifts) is one element which can explain some of the accidents. • Potential causes: high levels of ambiant noise, noise-induced hearing loss, lack of attention, placement and acoustic features of alarms, hearing protectors

  3. SOME STATISTICS • Fatal accidents involving workers struck by a machine in motion: - 1980-1992: 667 fatal accidents (USA) (on construction sites; Sweeney et al., 1999) - 1975-2000: > 25 fatal accidents (Quebec) (in reverse mode; Laroche, 2001)

  4. SOME STATISTICS • Serious or fatal accidents involving forklifts: • 1984-1992: 14 deaths (Illinois) • 1991-1992: 24 deaths (OSHA) • 1994-1997: 316 serious accidents (CSST, Quebec) • 1974-1999: 9 deaths (CSST, Quebec)

  5. Employee Type of vehicle Cause of accident Comments flag person (construction site) dump truck reverse alarm not detected alarm: 90dBA; noise from truck: 87dBA quality control attendant (construction site) dump truck reverse alarm not detected alarm in front of the 2 back axles and directed towards the left alarm : 80-85dBA  noise : 105-107dBA worker (road repair) dump truck Absence of reverse alarm? Noise from a mechanical digger Background noise > truck noise Examples of accidents involving mobile vehicles

  6. Examples of accidents involving forklifts

  7. POTENTIAL CAUSES • High level of ambiant noise in the workplace • High prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) • Worker’s attentional demand • Inadequate placement of reverse alarms on vehicles • Deficient acoustic features of existing reverse alarms • Hearing protectors

  8. High levels of ambiant noise • On construction sites: (Suter, 1999) 745 000 (out of 5 million) workers exposed to Lp > 85 dBA Inadequate signalto noise ratio

  9. PREVALENCE OF NIHL • On construction sites: 18 to 33% of workers have hearing thresholds greater than an average of 25 dB at 1, 2, and 3 kHz (Ohlin, 1999)

  10. Worker ’s attention demand and perception • Wilcox (1994) has discussed myths associated with the perception of reverse alarms and the attention demand on forklift trucks: • Pedestrians get used to reverse alarms (habituation phenomenon) • Many forklifts, each equipped with an alarm, would create confusion

  11. Worker’s attention demand and perception • Accidents are caused by a task that demands too much of the victim’s attention • Reverse alarms are annoying

  12. Inadequate placement of reverse alarms • SAE-J994 standard on reverse alarms: « The alarm should be tested in free field, 4 feet above a horizontal reflecting plane, with the microphone 4 feet from the alarm’s horn along its 0 degree axis ». • This standard does not insure that every worker will perceive the alarm at any position behind the vehicle.

  13. Deficient acoustic features • What is found on the market? Reverse alarms with a pure tone (1000-1300 Hz) or modulated tones between two approximate frequencies (e.g. 1272-1310 Hz)

  14. Axis positions behind the heavy vehicles

  15. Positions of the alarm on a grader

  16. Variations in sound pressure levels at the rear of a grader

  17. Sound wave reflections

  18. Hearing protection • Sense of insecurity frequently reported: Difficulty to hear and understand speech communication and warning signals

  19. Recommendations • In order to reduce the number of fatal accidents involving pedestrians at the rear of vehicles: • Modifications in the design and positioning of reverse alarms • Avoid pure tones • Optimize the position • Better ergonomic design of mobile equipment • Addition of pedestrian corridors, when possible

  20. Recommendations (cont’d) • Explore ways to limit the habituation phenomenon • Obstacle detectors • Use of electronic mirrors There is a need for improvement in the reliability of these devices • Noise reduction in the workplace • Would reduce the prevalence of NIHL • Would reduce the masking effect of the background noise

More Related