1 / 26

The Brightness Constraint

=. -. I. I. (. x. ,. y. ). J. (. x. ,. y. ). Where:. t. Insufficient info. The Brightness Constraint. Brightness Constancy Equation:. Linearizing (assuming small (u,v) ):. Each pixel provides 1 equation in 2 unknowns (u,v).

jmcqueen
Download Presentation

The Brightness Constraint

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. = - I I ( x , y ) J ( x , y ) Where: t Insufficient info. The Brightness Constraint Brightness Constancy Equation: Linearizing (assuming small (u,v)): Each pixel provides 1 equation in 2 unknowns (u,v). Another constraint:Global Motion Model Constraint

  2.  Requires prior model selection The 2D/3D Dichotomy 3D Camera motion + 3D Scene structure + Independent motions Camera induced image motion = + Independent motions = Image motion = 2D techniques 3D techniques Do not model“3D scenes” Singularities in “2D scenes”

  3. Global Motion Models * 2D Models are easier to estimate than 3D models (much fewer unknowns  numerically more stable). * 2D models provide dense correspondences.  Relevant for: *Airborne video (distant scene) * Remote Surveillance (distant scene) * Camera on tripod (pure Zoom/Rotation) 2D Models: • Affine • Quadratic • Homography (Planar projective transform) 3D Models: • Rotation, Translation, 1/Depth • Instantaneous camera motion models • Essential/Fundamental Matrix • Plane+Parallax  Relevant when camera is translating, scene is near, with depth variations.

  4. Least Square Minimization (over all pixels): Example: Affine Motion Substituting into the B.C. Equation: Each pixel provides 1 linear constraint in 6 global unknowns (minimum 6 pixels necessary) Every pixel contributes  Confidence-weighted regression

  5. Example: Affine Motion Differentiating w.r.t. a1 , …, a6 and equating to zero  6 linear equations in 6 unknowns: Summation is over all the pixels in the image!

  6. Coarse-to-Fine Estimation Jw refine warp + u=1.25 pixels u=2.5 pixels ==> small u and v ... u=5 pixels u=10 pixels image J image J image I image I Pyramid of image J Pyramid of image I Parameter propagation:

  7. Quadratic– instantaneous approximation to planar motion Other 2D Motion Models Projective – exact planar motion (Homography H)

  8. Generated Mosaic image Panoramic Mosaic Image Original video clip Alignment accuracy (between a pair of frames): error < 0.1 pixel

  9. Video Removal Original Original Outliers Synthesized

  10. Video Enhancement ORIGINAL ENHANCED

  11. Direct Methods: Methods for motion and/or shape estimation, which recover the unknown parameters directly from measurable image quantities at each pixel in the image. Minimization step: Direct methods: Error measure based on dense measurable image quantities(Confidence-weighted regression; Exploits all available information) Feature-based methods: Error measure based on distances of a sparse set of distinct feature matches (SIFT, HOG,...)

  12. Benefits of Direct Methods • High subpixel accuracy. • Simultaneously estimate matches + transformation  Do not need distinct features for image alignment: • Strong locking property.

  13. Limitations • Limited search range (up to ~10% of the image size). • Brightness constancy assumption.

  14. Video Indexing and Editing

  15. Source of dichotomy: Camera-centric models (R,T,Z) Camera motion + Scene structure + Independent motions The 2D/3D Dichotomy Camera induced motion = + Independent motions = Image motion = 2D techniques 3D techniques Do not model “3D scenes” Singularities in “2D scenes”

  16. The residual parallax lies on aradial (epipolar) field: epipole Original Sequence Plane-Stabilized Sequence The Plane+Parallax Decomposition

  17. 1. Reduces the search space: • Eliminates effects of rotation • Eliminates changes in camera calibration parameters / zoom Benefits of the P+P Decomposition • Camera parameters: Need to estimate only the epipole. (i.e., 2 unknowns) • Image displacements: Constrained to lie on radial lines (i.e., reduces to a 1D search problem)  A result of aligning an existing structure in the image.

  18. 2. Scene-Centered Representation: Benefits of the P+P Decomposition Translation or pure rotation ??? Focus on relevant portion of info Remove global component which dilutes information !

  19. 2. Scene-Centered Representation: Shape =Fluctuations relative to a planar surface in the scene Benefits of the P+P Decomposition STAB_RUG SEQ

  20. total distance [97..103] camera center scene global (100) component local [-3..+3] component 2. Scene-Centered Representation: Shape =Fluctuations relative to a planar surface in the scene Benefits of the P+P Decomposition • Height vs. Depth (e.g., obstacle avoidance) • Appropriate units for shape • A compact representation - fewer bits, progressive encoding

  21. 3. Stratified 2D-3D Representation: • Start with 2D estimation (homography). Benefits of the P+P Decomposition • 3D info builds on top of 2D info. Avoids a-priori model selection.

  22. Dense 3D Reconstruction(Plane+Parallax) Original sequence Plane-aligned sequence Recovered shape

  23. Dense 3D Reconstruction(Plane+Parallax) Original sequence Plane-aligned sequence Recovered shape

  24. Dense 3D Reconstruction(Plane+Parallax) Original sequence Plane-aligned sequence Recovered shape

  25. p Epipolar line epipole Brightness Constancy constraint 1. Eliminating Aperture Problem P+P Correspondence Estimation The intersection of the two line constraints uniquely defines the displacement.

  26. other epipolar line p Epipolar line another epipole epipole Brightness Constancy constraint 1. Eliminating Aperture Problem Multi-Frame vs. 2-Frame Estimation The other epipole resolves the ambiguity ! The two line constraints are parallel ==> do NOT intersect

More Related