1 / 22

Developing Professional Practice Week 5 – Professionalism, Quality and Accountability

Developing Professional Practice Week 5 – Professionalism, Quality and Accountability. To do list…. Recap last week, identify key themes and contested ideas. Define “quality systems” and explain elements of an institutional quality cycle that apply to your teaching

jiro
Download Presentation

Developing Professional Practice Week 5 – Professionalism, Quality and Accountability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developing Professional Practice Week 5 – Professionalism, Quality and Accountability

  2. To do list….. • Recap last week, identify key themes and contested ideas. • Define “quality systems” and explain elements of an institutional quality cycle that apply to your teaching • Explain how you (the professional) fit into the quality process • Explain the relationship between quality and accountability • All above in reference to the presentation

  3. Recap: John Giddins UCU In groups of 3…… What where the main “themes” of John “UCU” Giddin’s lecture? • Produce a bullet point list

  4. A Definition Managerialism • organisations have more similarities than differences • performance of all organisations can be optimised by the application of generic management skills and theory. • there is little difference in the skills required to run a college, an estate agency or a factory. • experience and skills pertinent to an organisation's core business are considered secondary.

  5. Times Higher Education Supplement (2001) "New managerialism" usually refers to practices commonplace in the private sector, particularly the imposition of a powerful management body that overrides professional skills and knowledge. It keeps discipline under tight control and is driven by efficiency, external accountability and monitoring, and an emphasis on standards.

  6. FE and the New Managerialism.Randle and Brady 1997

  7. References if needed for Essay Times Higher Education Supplement (2001) Outbreak of 'new managerialism’ infects faculties [Online] Available http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=164003&sectioncode=26 [20 Oct 2009] Randle, K. and Brady, N.(1997)'Further Education and the New Managerialism', Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 21, No.2, p232 The History Boys (2006) Film. Directed Nicholas Hytner. UK: Free Range Films

  8. IfL - Defending Professionalism? Does the ifL support or undermine your professionalism? • registering teachers and trainers in FE and skills • keeping an overview of teachers’ continuing professional development (CPD) • conferring the professional status of Qualified Teacher Learning and Skills (QTLS) and Associate Teacher Learning and Skills (ATLS) through the Professional Formation process

  9. IfL Task - the debate In pairs: Read & highlight article • Agree a summary of main points and a clear statement of the ‘argument’ • You will put forward THAT argument- irrespective of what you really think

  10. Quality Assurance, Quality Improvement, Accountability • Do these phrases leave you cold or do you get hot under the collar? • What do they imply for the professional teacher? • What is your experience of these in your work? • What are your responsibilities?

  11. Initials exercise LLUK, NIACE, LSIS, QAA, DFE, QCA, QCDA, QIP, SAR, OFSTED, ALI, IV, EV, EE……. • These are a list of common acronyms connected to quality procedures or organisations…..do you know what the letters stand for? • Can you add one of your own

  12. Who are the ‘stakeholders’ What does each stakeholder want from the quality system? • You • Your colleagues • Your current learners • Your future learners • Your institution • The funding bodies • The Government • Society and humankind in general State specifically how each of these might benefit from quality systems

  13. Why is all this quality stuff so important? • To assess the effectiveness and relevance of the education you are carrying out. • To give you information to help improve your educational provision. • To give your participants the opportunity to say what they think about the education they have been involved in. • To make the best use of resources • To compare your programmes with how other students and institutions perform (management level)

  14. Your Role • As a teacher, your principle responsibility is to evaluate your courses, teaching, student learning • Standardisation is an example of Quality Assurance (QA) • Action Planning based on end of year reviews is an example of Quality Improvement (QI)

  15. Evaluation is an attempt to judge the value of an activity or event. “Evaluation is the collection of, analysis and interpretation of information about any aspect of a programme of education and training, as part of a recognised process of judging its effectiveness, its efficiency and any other outcomes it might have” (Mary Thorpe Open University 1998, online) All of this evaluation at ‘teacher’ level should inform quality systems at institutional and other levels

  16. Quality info sources • SPOCS • Student questionnaires/ focus groups/ course committees • Self reflection • Statistics- e.g. learner achievement • Standardisation meetings • EV/IV input • Comparison (Benchmarking) • Quality of work • Tutorials

  17. Quality cycle Examine the chart • Sit in pairs- pair up with someone from a similar curriculum area • Interpret the chart between you (you can note ideas separately if you wish) Annotate the quality cycle chart as follows: • Stakeholders (label them) • Quality processes (specify if you can whether QA or QI or both)

  18. The big question • Does all this quality stuff make you more of a professional?

  19. Presentations – Planning In your pair make notes in response to……. • State your topic and very brief outline of your premise. • State why/how it is linked to quality and/or accountability. • Critically examine key issues using examples where possible • Consider alternatives and potential solutions Grading is based on CONTENT not presentation skills. Presentation is only an issue if we can’t understand what you are saying

  20. Next time Ofsted are visiting the most “iconic” quality body in education…… • Do they do QA or QI? • Do you feel they do a good job in making education professionals accountable? Also Presentation workshop………

More Related