1 / 38

Velocity Analysis Using Shaping Regularization

UTAM Sponsor Meeting 2009. Velocity Analysis Using Shaping Regularization. Sergey Fomel. “ If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants. ”. February 5, 1676. Isaac Newton. Robert Hooke. s. e. Linearization. Hooke’s law elastic theory seismic waves

jera
Download Presentation

Velocity Analysis Using Shaping Regularization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UTAM Sponsor Meeting 2009 Velocity Analysis Using Shaping Regularization Sergey Fomel

  2. “If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants.” February 5, 1676 Isaac Newton Robert Hooke

  3. s e Linearization • Hooke’s law • elastic theory • seismic waves • Newton’s method • gradient optimization • seismic tomography

  4. The Marmousi experience (Versteeg, 1994)

  5. Outline • Shaping framework for nonlinear inversion • R-algorithm (Goldin, 1986) • Iterative thresholding (Daubechies et al. , 1994) • Toy problem • 1-D velocity estimation • local slopes • Collaborative research environments

  6. Forward and Backward • m model (what we want to find) • d data (what we measure) • d = F[m] forward operator (accurate) • m0 = B[d] backward operator (affordable) • m = m + B[d] - BF[m] • mk+1 = mk + B[d] - BF[mk] • Landweber iteration (R-algorithm)

  7. Sergey V. Goldin (1936-2007)

  8. Landweber Iteration • mk+1 = mk + B[d] - BF[mk] • converges to the solution of B[d]=BF[m] if spectral radius (I-BF) < 1 • alternatively iteration in the data space dk+1 = dk + d - FB[dk] and mk= B[dk] “adding the noise back” (Osher et al., 2005)

  9. Regularized Iteration • mk+1 = S[mk + B[d] - BF[mk]] • S shaping operator • Example: sparsity-constrained inversion • (Daubecheis et al., 2004) • Thresholding • ║d - F m ║2 + ║m║1 • m = S[m + B[d] - BF[m]] • m = [I + S (BF-I)]-1 SB[d]

  10. Shaping Regularization • m = [I + S (BF-I)]-1 SB[d] • (Fomel, 2007; 2008) Shaping

  11. Shaping versus Tikhonov/Bayes • m = [I + S (BF-I)]-1 SB d • m = M F* [F M F* +N]-1 d • S = [I+ M-1 ]-1 • B = F* N-1

  12. Outline • Shaping framework for nonlinear inversion • R-algorithm (Goldin, 1986) • Iterative thresholding (Daubechies et al. , 1994) • Toy problem • 1-D velocity estimation • local slopes • Collaborative research environments

  13. Toy problem • Model m • Data and forward operator d = F[m] • Backward operator m0 = B[d] • local slopes • Shaping operator S[m] • smooth models • blocky models

  14. Forward Operator (Stoffa et al, 1982) q Dz

  15. Predict each trace from its neighbor • Minimize prediction error (least squares) • Apply shaping regularization

  16. Backward Operator (Fomel, 2007)

  17. Backward Operator • Interval velocity as a data attribute! • T(t,p), v(t,p)

  18. Assumptions 1-D no multiples no AVO Forward operator ray tracing Backward operator local slopes hyperbolic moveout Shaping operator smooth blocky Extensions 3-D waveform modeling stereoslopes anisotropy Toy problem

  19. Outline • Shaping framework for nonlinear inversion • R-algorithm (Goldin, 1986) • Iterative thresholding (Daubechies et al. , 1994) • Toy problem • 1-D velocity estimation • local slopes • Collaborative research environments

  20. http://ahay.org Collaborative Research Environment • “Reproducible research” • Open source • Open community • Open science

  21. The mission of ICES isto provide the infrastructure and intellectual leadership for developing outstanding interdisciplinary programs in research and graduate study in computational sciences and engineering. • multi-billion-dollar endowment • independent Board of Trustees • merit-based and open to men and women from around the world

  22. Conclusions • Shaping regularization is a general framework for linear and nonlinear inverse problems. • Velocity analysis and velocity model building • Local slope estimation • Nonstationary matching filtering • Shared research environments enable world-wide collaboration and computational reproducibility. • “Standing on the shoulders of Giants” http://ahay.org

More Related