1 / 20

Panel: Tech-enabled T&L and the Big-G

Panel: Tech-enabled T&L and the Big-G. Bo Wandschneider , CIO, Queen's Glenn Hollinger, Dir. Client Services, Saskatchewan Mario Lebar , Dir. Enterprise Systems, Manitoba Restiani Andriati , Mgr Digital Media Projects Office , Ryerson

ivie
Download Presentation

Panel: Tech-enabled T&L and the Big-G

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Panel: Tech-enabled T&L and the Big-G Bo Wandschneider, CIO, Queen's Glenn Hollinger, Dir. Client Services, Saskatchewan Mario Lebar, Dir. Enterprise Systems, Manitoba RestianiAndriati, Mgr Digital Media Projects Office, Ryerson Andrea Chappell, Dir. Instructional Tech and Media Services, Waterloo

  2. Abstract • How are universities setting tech-enabled learning directions and making decisions for near, far horizon? • Potential big shifts (even tsunamis) in online learning space. Keeping up difficult, let alone setting course. • MOOCs, badging/credentialing, tablet/BYOD devices, gamification, learning analytics, ubiquitous social media, info consumers becoming providers, publishers’ offerings, open content and courses, scaling innovations, etc. • Our well-understood and participatory governance structures for setting tech-enabled T&L directions are closely aligned with university and IT directions. No?

  3. Queen’s Bo Wandschneider, CIO • Set stage within big picture of IT governance • Queen's recently set up Teaching and Learning Advisory Committee (one of 3 advisory committees that Bo looks to for IT directions)

  4. Saskatchewan Glenn Hollinger, Director of Client Services, ICT • Moving from "organically grown" stewardship for tech-enabled teaching and learning • More deliberate and planned approach • Participants in new model

  5. Current State Organizational Units • Electronic Media Access and Production • ICT • Center for Continuing and Distributed Education • GMTLC and University Learning Center • College Teaching and Learning Centers Committees • Teaching Learning and Academic Resources • Learning Technologies Governance • Distributed Learning Governance • ICT Planning and Priorities • TACOBEL

  6. Information Systems Stewardship

  7. Educational Systems Steering Committee • Vice-Provost, Teaching and Learning • Chief Information Officer and AVP ICT • Two Deans (To be rotated every two years) • Associate Vice-President Student Affairs • Two Faculty members • Student Representative • Dean of Libraries • ICT Director Client Services (Non-voting) • ICT Director Applications(Non-voting) • ICT Project Portfolio Office representative(Non-voting)

  8. Manitoba Mario Lebar, Director of Enterprise Systems in IST • Manitoba re-vitalized their Senate Committee on Academic Computing in April 2013 • Chair is Director of Center for Teaching and Learning • Broad membership includes faculty, administration and students • Forum for addressing enterprise-wide IT issues related to T&L • Recommendations and advice flow to Senate, President’s Advisory Council on IT and Innovation, CIO

  9. Ryerson RestianiAndriati, Manager of Digital Media Projects Office, in CCS • 1.5 years ago Ryerson undertook process to set e-learning strategies • Advisory Committee on Academic Computing (ACAC) works as a consulting body alongside strategy process • Advisory to Provost & Vice Provost, Academic, and Vice President, Admin & Finance • Computing and tech issues, how they affect faculty, and vice versa

  10. ACAC Provost & Vice President, Academic Vice President, Administration & Finance Advisory Committee on Academic Computing

  11. Members

  12. Role and Mandate

  13. Waterloo Andrea Chappell, Director of Instructional Tech & Media Services in IST • No overarching strategic tech-enabled T&L committee • T&L support groups collaborate to plan and evolve • Goals/objectives from 2013 Waterloo strategic plan spurred renewed direction-setting activities • “Going green" – re-using existing committees for input to planned directions (Learning Environment Ops, Undergrad Ops, Grad Ops) • Is this sufficient for governance/stewardship?

  14. Who “owns” Tech-enabled T&L directions? • Pedagogy should drive technology • True, but sometimes technologies arrive and reverse the direction • Main areas of support and evolution: • Pedagogy and instructional design • Course material development • Application support and development • Technical infrastructure

  15. Tech-enabled T&L areas

  16. Tech-enabled T&L areas

  17. Have: Learning Environment Ops Reports significant items to top-level University IT committee (UCIST) • IT (Instructional tech group in IT) • Centre for Extended Learning (fully online courses) • Centre for Teaching Excellence (pedagogy support for campus courses) • Library • (And, connection to bookstore)

  18. Re-using: Undergrad Ops Committee Operational matters (e.g., scheduling, calendar); at times, advisory capacity to Senate Undergrad Council  • Chair: Assoc. VP Academic • 6 Faculties • University Colleges rep • Registrar (4) • Centre for Extended Learning (fully online course) • Student Success • Accessibility • Co-op and Career Ed

  19. IT: University Committee on Information Systems and Technology Top level IT strategy committee. Undergoing a Terms of Reference and membership review • Chair: CIO • 6 Faculty Associate Dean of Computing or other rep • Assoc. Provost, Students • Library • Co-op and Career Ed • AVP Academic • 2 IT reps (Instructional Tech, Client Services) • Special Advisory to Provost

  20. Your questions? • Discussion re: “pedagogy should drive technology” but often IT is lead, where change is happening most quickly. • How to engage students? Student advisory groups, student IT experience groups, where students set agenda for what to work on; also, focus groups. • (Likely more, but no notes!)

More Related