1 / 31

Results

Results. U.S. Army 2005 MWR Leisure Needs Survey. 235 th BSB - Ansbach Germany. BRIEFING OUTLINE. LEISURE NEEDS SURVEY Project Overview Methodology Patron Sample Products SURVEY RESULTS MWR Programs and Facilities Army Community Service Child and Youth Services

Download Presentation

Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Results U.S.Army 2005 MWR Leisure Needs Survey 235th BSB - Ansbach Germany

  2. BRIEFING OUTLINE • LEISURE NEEDS SURVEY • Project Overview • Methodology • Patron Sample • Products • SURVEY RESULTS • MWR Programs and Facilities • Army Community Service • Child and Youth Services • Better Opportunities for Single Soldiers • Leisure Activities • Deployment and MWR • Career Intentions • NEXT STEPS

  3. PROJECT OVERVIEW Analyzing and forecasting the external environment Analyzing programs and markets Developing alternatives Formulating the strategic business plan Formulating operational business plans Monitoring and evaluating plan implementation Mission and vision statements Customer and market analysis Policies, regulations, mission, and laws Composite evaluation Strategic goals and objectives Program business plans Programs and facilities inventory and analysis Installation and community profiles Planning projections and assumptions Monitoring, assessment, and feedback Implementation guidance Functional support plans Competitive analysis Business and industry standards and trends Integrated SWOT analysis Capital Improvements program Program costs and resources analysis Contingency plans MWR STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLANNING MODEL COMPONENTS ELEMENTS

  4. METHODOLOGY • PROJECT SCOPE • 92 sites were surveyed in 2005 - Northeast (21 sites) - Europe (20 sites) - Northwest (10 sites) - Korea (9 sites) - Southeast (13 sites) - Pacific (5 sites) - Southwest (14 sites) • 249,555 surveys were distributed throughout the Army to four patron groups: • Active Duty Soldiers • Spouses of Active Duty Soldiers (CONUS only) • DA Civilians • Retirees (CONUS only) • 1,396 surveys were distributed at 235th BSB - Ansbach • SURVEY ADMINISTRATION • Designed to collect information on installation MWR programs and facilities as well as the leisure activities of your potential market • 65 multiple choice questions; 7 questions were tailored to your specific installation issues

  5. METHODOLOGY • SURVEY ADMINISTRATION (Continued) • Active Duty and DA Civilian surveys distributed by installation POCs • Spouses of Active Duty and Retiree surveys direct mailed to home addresses (CONUS only) • Web survey option offered for the first time to all respondents

  6. METHODOLOGY • SURVEY SAMPLE • Four population segments - Active Duty - Civilian Employees - Spouses of Active Duty (CONUS only) - Retirees (CONUS only) • Response Rates and Confidence Intervals for each patron group and overall sample _____________________________________________________ * Response rate is calculated by dividing the number of surveys returned by the number of surveys distributed. It should be noted that low response rates (i.e., less than 20%) increase the chance that one or more subgroups (e.g., for active duty patron group, E1-E4 is a subgroup) may be over- or under-represented. Any patron groups with fewer than 15 survey respondents do not have their data reported to protect privacy and ensure representativeness. **A confidence interval for a sample mean tells us the range in which we are likely to find the true population mean: Assume 300 surveys were returned for an active duty patron group of 1,350. 52% responded that they used the gym in the last year. The 95% confidence interval for this case would be 5%. Thus there is a 95% chance that the TOTAL number of active duty at this installation who used the gym last year is between 47% and 57%. We can be 95% confident that between 634 and 770 active duty used the gym last year.

  7. PATRON SAMPLE* RESPONDENT POPULATION SEGMENTS ACTIVE DUTY (n = 201) CIVILIANS (n = 36) *The n provided for each patron group is equal to the number of respondents who provided their rank or paygrade.

  8. PRODUCTS • PRODUCTS • Comprehensive installation report of survey data in electronic form • SPSS data file provided to installation representatives for further analyses, if desired • Installation level briefing of findings • IMA and Army level roll-up reports and briefings • PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION • All products provided on CD • CD distribution to installation MWR Directors, IMA Headquarters, and U.S. Army Community and Family Support Center

  9. MWR PROGRAMS & FACILITIES: USAGE AT 235th BSB - ANSBACH MOST FREQUENTLY USED FACILITIES LEAST FREQUENTLY USED FACILITIES Fitness Center/Gymnasium 85% Library 42% Automotive Skills 39% Athletic Fields 32% Outdoor Recreation Center 20% Cabins & Campgrounds 5% Youth Center 8% School Age Services 10% Child Development Center 12% BOSS 13%

  10. MWR PROGRAMS & FACILITIES: SATISFACTION AT 235th BSB - ANSBACH* FACILITIES WITH HIGHEST SATISFACTION RATINGS* FACILITIES WITH LOWEST SATISFACTION RATINGS* Library 4.10 Outdoor Recreation Center 4.10 School Age Services 4.03 Fitness Center/Gymnasium 4.03 BOSS 3.98 Arts & Crafts Center 3.54 Automotive Skills 3.62 Youth Center 3.77 Athletic Fields 3.84 Cabins & Campgrounds 3.84 *Programs and facilities were rated on a 5 point scale: 5 = Very Satisfied and 1 = Very Dissatisfied

  11. MWR PROGRAMS & FACILITIES: QUALITY AT 235th BSB - ANSBACH* FACILITIES WITH HIGHEST QUALITY RATINGS* FACILITIES WITH LOWEST QUALITY RATINGS* Library 3.91 Outdoor Recreation Center 3.91 Cabins & Campgrounds 3.89 School Age Services 3.86 Fitness Center/Gymnasium 3.82 Automotive Skills 3.49 Youth Center 3.51 Arts & Crafts Center 3.57 Post Picnic Area 3.62 BOSS 3.64 • *Programs and facilities were rated on a 5 point scale: 5 = Very Good and 1 = Very Poor. These ratings are an average • of three quality scores: Building/Facility/Space, Equipment/Furnishings, and Personnel.

  12. MWR PROGRAMS & FACILITIES: FOOD AND BEVERAGE SERVICES QUALITY Quality of On-Post Services Quality of Off-Post Services

  13. MWR PROGRAMS & FACILITIES: CATERING SERVICES QUALITY Quality of On-Post Services Quality of Off-Post Services

  14. MWR PROGRAMS & FACILITIES: ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES QUALITY Quality of On-Post Services Quality of Off-Post Services

  15. MWR PROGRAMS & FACILITIES: CLUB PROGRAM ELIMINATION EFFECT ON ARMY QOL

  16. MWR PROGRAMS & FACILITIES: RECREATION PROGRAM ELIMINATION EFFECT ON ARMY QOL

  17. MWR PROGRAMS & SERVICES: MOST AND LEAST IMPORTANT ACTIVITIES/PROGRAMS Respondents were asked to select the 7 most important and 7 least important activities and programs offered on an Army installation. Top 7 Activities/Programs Fitness Center/Gymnasium 84% Automotive Skills 60% Library 56% Army Lodging 54% Bowling Center 47% Child Development Center 47% Athletic Fields 45% RV Park 79% Golf Course Pro Shop 64% Golf Course 53% Marina 53% Bowling Pro Shop 51% Golf Course Food & Beverage 49% Cabins & Campgrounds 48% Bottom 7 Activities/Programs

  18. MWR PROGRAMS & SERVICES: SOURCES OF INFORMATION* *The top 3 sources of MWR information are shaded for each patron group and the total population.

  19. MWR PROGRAMS/SERVICES: GENERATE FEELING THAT THE ARMY CARES ABOUT ITS PEOPLE* * Positive = moderate, great or very great extent

  20. ARMY COMMUNITY SERVICE:AWARENESS AND BENEFIT – ACTIVE DUTY * Percentage of Active Duty users

  21. ARMY COMMUNITY SERVICE: POSITIVE IMPACTS ON ACTIVE DUTY * Positive = moderate, great or very great extent

  22. CHILD AND YOUTH SERVICES: POSITIVE IMPACTS ON ACTIVE DUTY * Positive = moderate, great or very great extent

  23. BETTER OPPORTUNITIES FOR SINGLE SOLDIERS (BOSS): POSITIVE IMPACTS ON ACTIVE DUTY * Positive = moderate, great or very great extent

  24. LEISURE ACTIVITIES: PREFERENCES OVERALL AND BY PATRON GROUP Top 10 Leisure Activities for All Respondents Top 5 for Active Duty Watching TV, videotapes, and DVDs 48% Internet access/applications (home) 47% Entertaining guests at home 41% Going to movie theaters 39% Internet access (library) 38% Watching TV, videotapes, and DVDs 49% Internet access/applications (home) 48% Entertaining guests at home 42% Going to movie theaters 39% Internet access (library) 38% Running/jogging 36% Cardiovascular equipment 35% Night clubs/lounges 35% Weight/strength training 34% Festivals/events 32% Top 5 for Civilians Watching TV, videotapes, and DVDs 82% Entertaining guests at home 54% Internet access/applications (home) 50% Reading 47% Special family events 46%

  25. LEISURE ACTIVITIES: PREFERENCES BY ACTIVITY CATEGORY Team Sports Sports and Fitness Softball 14% Basketball 12% Touch/flag football 11% Volleyball 9% Self-directed sports tournaments 8% Running/jogging 36% Cardiovascular equipment 35% Weight/strength training 34% Bowling 32% Walking 31% Outdoor Recreation Entertainment Bicycle riding/mountain biking 20% Snow skiing/snowboarding 16% Going to beaches/lakes 15% Camping/hiking/backpacking 14% Picnicking 11% Watching TV, videotapes, and DVDs 49% Going to movie theaters 39% Festivals/events 32% Live entertainment 20% Billiards/game rooms/video arcades 17% Social Special Interests Entertaining guests at home 42% Night clubs/lounges 35% Dancing 25% Happy hour/social hour 22% Special family events 20% Internet access/applications (home) 48% Automotive maintenance & repair 32% Automotive detailing/washing 24% Computer games 21% Digital photography 19%

  26. LEISURE ACTIVITIES: MARKET SHARE OF ACTIVITY PREFERENCES ON POST* *Top 7 leisure activity preferences ranked by on-post participation.

  27. LEISURE ACTIVITIES: MARKET SHARE OF SPECIAL INTEREST ACTIVITY PREFERENCES BY LOCATION* *Top 7 special interest activity preferences ranked by overall participation.

  28. DEPLOYMENT AND MWR: IMPORTANCE OF ACCESS TO MWR DURING DEPLOYMENT

  29. DEPLOYMENT AND MWR: USE OF MWR DURING DEPLOYMENT IN THEATER OR AT HOME INSTALLATION

  30. CAREER INTENTIONS: ACTIVE DUTY

  31. NEXT STEPS • INSTALLATION REPORTS • Review information on 91 leisure activities and up to 40 MWR facilities • Share with Commander and program managers • DATA APPLICATIONS • Action planning for program change and enhancement • Strategic business planning • Five year program planning • Priorities for Project Validation Assessments • Follow-up focus groups on items of interest or for clarification of findings • Input into the Installation Status Report (ISR)

More Related