1 / 11

MCC’s use of Governance Indicators

MCC’s use of Governance Indicators. Consumers of 3 rd party indicators Aid allocation for 2 programs Compact Threshold Competition: rule-driven, publicly available data Process: 2 income categories 17 indicators, 3 categories Indicator Ccore > median  pass

hedwig-bryant
Download Presentation

MCC’s use of Governance Indicators

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MCC’s use of Governance Indicators • Consumers of 3rd party indicators • Aid allocation for 2 programs • Compact • Threshold • Competition: rule-driven, publicly available data • Process: • 2 income categories • 17 indicators, 3 categories • Indicator Ccore > median  pass • Pass > ½ indicators in each category + corruption

  2. Indicators: 3 Categories

  3. Scorecard

  4. Indicator Category: Ruling Justly Kenya FY08

  5. Where Does MCC work? • 25 countries eligible for Compacts. 16 Compacts signed; 9 in the pipeline. • About $5.5 billion committed to date for Compacts. • 21 countries eligible for Threshold Program 18 Threshold programs approved to date for roughly $400 million.

  6. MCA Compact Countries Africa BeninMali Burkina Faso Malawi Cape VerdeMorocco Ghana Mozambique LesothoNamibia Madagascar Senegal Tanzania Latin AmericaEurasia Bolivia Armenia El Salvador East Timor HondurasGeorgia Nicaragua Jordan Moldova Mongolia Philippines Ukraine Vanuatu Countries in blue have signed or MCC Board-approved Compacts

  7. Strengths • Transparent system • Distinguish top/bottom performers • Attention to policy performance…Governance matters • Policy dialogue • Incentives

  8. Challenges • Lags • New data sources • Rank change vs. performance change • Fine distinctions

  9. LIC Corruption Rankings

  10. Challenges • Short term tracking • Goal displacement • Credibility

More Related