1 / 12

Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall .

goro
Download Presentation

Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall Allan Stewart, MD., Jonathan A. Yang, MD; Mark J. Russo, MD/MPH; Alexander Iribarne, MD; Brendan F. Scully; Rachel Easterwood; Craig R. Smith, MD; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY

  2. Aortic Insufficiency & Root Aneurysm • Different treatment options exist • Bentall Procedure1 • Several modifications • Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) • Sir MagdiYacoub, Tirone David • We have performed both at our Institution since 2005 1. Bentall H, De Bono A. A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta. Thorax. 23(4):338-9.

  3. Methods • Retrospective study • Peri-Operative and short-term data • VSRR via the re-implantation method described by David, et al1 • Modified Bentall Procedures – novel composite biologic graft 1. David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J ThoracCardiovasc Surg. 1992 April; 103(4):617-21.

  4. Valve-Sparing Root Replacement

  5. BioRoot Edwards Perimount Valve ATS 3f Valve

  6. BioRoot

  7. Results

  8. Pre-Treatment Decisions

  9. “Real-time” Repair Algorithm (AI + Aneurysm) Reimplantation Can valve be Repaired? Should it be Repaired? Repair Yes Yes Remodeling No BioRoot Should it be Replaced? Replace Yes Mechanical Conduit No Ignore

  10. When Should We Repair? • Aortic Leaflet Integrity • Reliable valve-sparing results with: • supple leaflets • normal annular size • Bicuspid and tri-leaflets have good 10-year data • High Failure Rates with: • Severe AI • Multi-leaflet Prolapse • Multiple Fenestrations

  11. When Should We Replace? • Marked leaflet Asymmetry • Multiple leaflet Fenestrations • “Broken leaflets” • Bicuspid Patients • Significant Thickening • Prolapse • Calcification • Multiple Fenestrations • Connective Tissue Patients • Data is unclear • Be cautious in repairing attenuated & severely prolapsed valves

  12. Conclusions • Similar operative times • Low rates of post-op AI, repeat AVR and mortality • Similar short-term outcomes • Reproducible and safe • Need to delineate proper guidelines for indications • Follow-up needed to assess long-term outcomes

More Related