170 likes | 331 Views
Approach similar in different hospitals. Strong multidisciplinary approachInvolving patient / patient education central to processCommitment to quality / competition' between areasDieticians actively changing treatment / holding prescriber statusUse of full range of phosphate bindersUse of ultra low calcium dialysate.
E N D
1. Phosphate Control - secrets of ‘good’ units Hugh Cairns on behalf of Tyrone Hospital, Royal Berkshire Hospital and King’s
4. Approach similar in different hospitals Strong multidisciplinary approach
Involving patient / patient education central to process
Commitment to quality / ‘competition’ between areas
Dieticians actively changing treatment / holding prescriber status
Use of full range of phosphate binders
Use of ultra low calcium dialysate
5. Multidisciplinary approach Dietetic, pharmacist, nurse, doctor input
Monthly reviews look at many factors - difficult for an individual to concentrate on all
Importance of several individuals reviewing results regularly
Education for patient comes from many sources and more frequently
6. Patient Education Phosphate control depends on adherence / compliance
Difficult for patients to understand reasons to control phosphate
Anxiety about bone disease not an incentive for patients
Focus on cardiovascular risk may make easier
Need to educate repeatedly and in different ways
Feedback of patient results - monthly sheet
7. King’s HD Patient Information Sheet
8. Quality control Monthly review of laboratory results
Minimum dialysis nurse and doctor. Usually nurse, pharmacist, dietician and doctor
Highlighting results outside of desired range
Dieticians confirming compliance / adherence with medication / diet
Specific clinic for patients with poor results - Bone Club (Reading)
Patients seen 2 weekly by consultant/nurse/dietician
Dramatically improved PO4 results
9. Quality Control - competition Comparing results between HD areas
Regular audit comparing with RA guidelines and between areas
Regional audits / national audit (Fresenius)
Annual audit - comparison with RR data
10. King’s Monthly HD Audit Summary
11. Dietetic Involvement Dieticians central to process
Diet advice to patients
Oversee choice of phosphate binders - check compliance / timing / palatability
Empowered to change patients’ treatment
Alter doses / change binders / change Vit D
Write letters to GP / patient
12. Ultra low calcium dialysate - Tyrone Hospital Use of 0.75 mmol Ca in selected patients
Enables use of calcium containing phosphate binders
Small number of patients cannot tolerate (paraesthesia, hypotension)
13. Areas of Failure Significant minority of patients with persistently raised phosphate
10 -15% of patients - ethnic minorities, younger
Mechanistic, ‘scientific’ approach to problem - ‘solve by changing phosphate binder’
Clinicians adopt fatalistic view
14. Interventions to change behaviour Health Belief Model
Individual perceptions
Modifying factors
Likelihood of action
Locus of control - external v internal
Beattie’s model of health promotion
15. Beattie’s model of health promotion practice
16. Refocus on patients with poor phosphate control Patient education
Consider other approaches
Counsellor
Explore patients’ understanding
Group patient sessions
Education materials
17. ‘Secrets’ of good phosphate control - Summary Phosphate can be controlled with good patient adherence to diet and binders
Requires patient education from different sources and repeated frequently
Audit and competition drives improvement
Multidisciplinary approach - many minds / pairs of eyes
Still fail in significant minority
18. Steps to good phosphates 1. Recognising patients in whom phosphate raised
Monthly blood tests ? Multi-disciplinary review
2. Patient Education
Different individuals
Information provided in different ways
3. Use range of dietary measures and phosphate binders
4. Feedback results to patients monthly
5. Monthly audit / competition / appraisal
6. Special clinic for persistent raised PO4