1 / 13

Scholarship meeting

Scholarship meeting. Sept 12, 2012. Begin collecting and reviewing literature Keep a file of this literature. Review your findings to your mentor COMPLETE YOUR MENOR UPDATE (website) Timeline. PL-3 CURRENT SCHOLARSHIP TOPICS. PL-2 CURRENT SCHOLARSHIP TOPICS. ABSTRACT SUBMSSIONS.

Download Presentation

Scholarship meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Scholarship meeting Sept 12, 2012

  2. Begin collecting and reviewing literature Keep a file of this literature • Review your findings to your mentor • COMPLETE YOUR MENOR UPDATE (website) • Timeline

  3. PL-3 CURRENT SCHOLARSHIP TOPICS

  4. PL-2 CURRENT SCHOLARSHIP TOPICS

  5. ABSTRACT SUBMSSIONS • 2013 Pediatric Academic Societies, May 4- 7, 2013, • Washington D.C. • Abstract Submission Deadline: November 15, 2012 11:59pm CST www.pas-meeting.org • Southern Regional 2013, February 21-23, 2013, • Abstract Submission Deadline :October 12, 2012http://www.afmr.org/sr.cgi OVER—OVER—OVER OVER—OVER--OVER

  6. CATCH GRANTS • CATCH Resident Grants 2013 • Cycle 2 Community Access to Child Health • Applications for $3,000 CATCH grants for pediatric residents to address child health issues in their community will be available November 1st to January 31st at • Http://www2.aap.org/catch/residentgrants.htm • Awards will be made in June 2013. If you have questions, please contact Kathy Kocvara at kkocvara@aap.org

  7. Announcements • Grand Rounds • 2 ½ days per month on electives • (including Adolescent and Development) • and EM.

  8. ABSTRACT • Title and Author Information • Introduction • Methods • Results • Conclusion

  9. ABSTRACT Title • Summarizes the abstract and • Convinces the reviewers that the topic is important, relevant, and innovative. • To create a winning title: • write out 6 to 10 key words found in the abstract • string them into various sentences. • try to condense the title yet still convey the essential message. Author Information • Names of all authors and their institutional affiliations • first author listed will make the oral or poster presentation • Determine if the first author needs to meet any eligibility requirements • For example, the first author may need to be a member of the professional society sponsoring the research meeting. • This information is always included with the abstract instructions.

  10. ABSTRACT Introduction • Several sentences outlining the question addressed by the research. • Make the first sentence of the introduction as interesting and dramatic as possible. • For example, "100,000 people each year die of…" is more interesting than "An important cause of mortality is…" • Review of what is known about the problem • What is addressed by the research, • What remains unknown • The final sentence of the introduction describes the purpose of the study or the study's a priori hypothesis.

  11. ABSTRACT Methods • most difficult to write. • It must be scaled down • at the same time detailed enough to judge the validity of the work. • Specifically mention: • research design; • research setting; • number of patients enrolled in the study • how they were selected; • a description of the intervention • a listing of the outcome variables and how they were measured. • Statistical methods used to analyze the data are described.

  12. ABSTRACT Results • Begin with included and excluded subjects (and criteria). • List the most important outcome variables. • present comparisons between various subgroups within the study (treated vs. untreated, young vs. old, male vs. female, etc). • this type of data can be efficiently presented in a table, • Numerical results should include standard deviations or 95% confidence limits and the level of statistical significance. • If the results are not statistically significant • present the power of your study (beta-error rate) to detect a difference.

  13. ABSTRACT Conclusion • State what can be concluded and its implications. • Conclusions must be supported by the data presented in the abstract • Never present unsubstantiated personal opinion. • If there is room: • address the generalizability of the results • any weaknesses of the study

More Related