1 / 12

Integrated Corridor Management Overview and Status

Integrated Corridor Management Overview and Status. Mike Freitas ICM Initiative Coordinator U.S. DOT ITS Joint Program Office. Initial Definitions. Corridor

Download Presentation

Integrated Corridor Management Overview and Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Integrated Corridor ManagementOverview and Status Mike Freitas ICM Initiative Coordinator U.S. DOT ITS Joint Program Office

  2. Initial Definitions • Corridor • A corridor is defined as a combination of discrete adjacent surface transportation networks (e.g., freeway, arterial, transit networks) that link the same major origins and destinations. • Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) • Integrated corridor management is the coordination of individual network operations between adjacent facilities that creates an interconnected system capable of cross- network travel management.

  3. Corridors • Currently surface transportation systems are made up of several independent networks • Freeways, including managed lanes • Arterials • Bus Routes • Rail Transit • Efforts to date to “reduce congestion” have focused on optimization of individual networks • These adjacent network links overlay to form transportation corridors • Metropolitan areas contain several major corridors • Corridors offer an opportunity to operate and optimize the entire system as opposed to the individual networks

  4. Integrated Corridor Management

  5. Missing Integration • Institutional Integration • Lack of operational capability and technology that supports cross network distribution of responsibilities and sharing of control • Operational Integration • Lack of integrated cross network operational strategies and analysis capabilities • Technical Integration • Lack of cross network device-to-device data, communication, and procedure integration

  6. Integrated Corridor Management Initiative • Purpose • The initiative will demonstrate that ITS technologies can be used to efficiently and proactively manage the movement of people and goods in major transportation corridors by facilitating integration of the management of all the networks in a corridor. • Goal • The goal of the Integrated Corridor Management Initiative is to provide the institutional guidance, operational capabilities, and ITS technical methods needed for effective Integrated Corridor Management Systems. • Approach • Address Institutional, operational, and technical barriers to successful integrated corridor management • Demonstrate how mobility, safety and productivity can be increased in major corridors by • Efficient, effective, proactive use of ITS technology • Improved use of real-time data sharing • Implementing demand management strategies

  7. FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 Stakeholder Working Group Phase 1 : Foundational Phase 2 : Operations and Systems Development Research y t i l y i t b i i l i s b a i e s F a e t Phase 3 : Work with Candidate n F Model Deployment Sites e t n m e y m o Phase 3 : Model Deployment and l p p Evaluation o e l D e v l e e d D o Phase 4 : Integrated Corridor Phase 4 : Pre - Model M Management Knowledge and Deployment Knowledge and Technology Transfer Technology Transfer Standards Completion , and Deployment September 2007 August 2005 ICM Program Plan

  8. Stakeholder Involvement • Stakeholder Work Group • 20 representatives • Request For Information (RFI) • Gather information on corridor management activities • Study to identify needs • 18 Responses • Stakeholder Workshops • June 22 and 29 (one workshop, two locations) • ITSA • Website http://www.itsa.org/icm.html • Conference • Model Deployment Candidate Sites

  9. Model Deployment Site Selection Approach • Two-phased Approach: • Select candidate sites • Select model deployment site from candidate sites

  10. Phase 1 – Foundational Research • Team: Siemens ITS, TransCore, Dunn, SAIC, University of Virginia, Transystems, Howard / Stein-Hudson • Major Activities • Program management & stakeholder meetings • Definitions, criteria for delineating a corridor, relationship to regional ITS • Generic Concept of Operations for ICMS • ICM system requirements • Document successful local integration efforts • Identify corridor types, operational approaches / strategies, analysis tools • Analyze associated operational, institutional, & technical integration issues • Develop ICM development feasibility report / briefing • Assist with MDI effort

  11. Phase 1 Activities To Date • Definitions • “corridor” • “integrated corridor management” • Concepts for Delineating Corridor Boundaries • Relationship Between Corridor & Regional Management • Outline for Generic Concept of Operations • Stakeholder Meetings • Other Ongoing Activities • Review RFI responses, draft generic Con Ops, corridor types and strategies / operational approaches, simulation modeling

  12. Summary • Integrated Corridor Initiative Well Underway • Stakeholder Input is Critical • Various Venues for Participation • Stakeholder Group • RFI • Workshops • ITSA Website • Model Deployment Partner Solicitation

More Related