Why do a tmdl implementation plan for big otter watershed
Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 48

Why do a TMDL Implementation Plan for Big Otter Watershed? PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Why do a TMDL Implementation Plan for Big Otter Watershed?. What is a TMDL?. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) is a term used to describe the amount of pollution a stream can receive and still meet Water Quality Standards.

Download Presentation

Why do a TMDL Implementation Plan for Big Otter Watershed?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Why do a tmdl implementation plan for big otter watershed

Why do a TMDL Implementation Plan for Big Otter Watershed?

What is a tmdl

What is a TMDL?

  • Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) is a term used to describe the amount of pollution a stream can receive and still meet Water Quality Standards.

    • Identify all sources of pollution contributing to violation of water quality standards.

    • Calculate the amount of pollutants entering the stream from each source.

    • Calculate the reductions in pollutants, by source, needed to attain/maintain water quality standards.

Total maximum daily loads tmdls are mandated by law

Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are Mandated by Law

  • Federal 1972 Clean Water Act requires

    • Water Quality Monitoring

    • Periodic Assessment and Impaired Waters Listing

    • Develop TMDLs for Impaired Waters

  • Virginia’s 1997 Water Quality Monitoring

  • Information and Restoration Act (WQMIRA)

  • requires

    • TMDLs for Impaired Waters

    • An Implementation Plan

  • 1999 Consent Degree with EPA to develop

  • TMDL Reports for all 1998 listed streams by

  • 2010

Tmdl 3 part process

TMDL- 3 Part Process:

  • TMDL development

  • Implementation Plan development

  • Implement the plan

Steps after epa approval

Steps after EPA Approval

  • Develop Implementation Plans

  • Continue targeted Best Management Practices

  • Continue stream monitoring: DEQ, Citizen Monitoring

Steps between epa approval and implementation plan start up

Steps between EPA Approval and Implementation Plan Start-up

  • Interim period between TMDL approval and Implementation Plan development

    • Promote implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs)

    • Initiate educational outreach activities

    • Establish organizational framework for the Implementation Plan development

    • Identify and seek funding opportunities (i.e., grants)

Implementation plan development

Implementation Plan development is required by state legislation (WQMIRA, 1997)

DCR has lead for NPS TMDL implementation plans

DCR, DEQ, and other state, federal and local agencies will support plan development

Implementation Plan Development

Implementation plan development1

Implementation Plan Development

  • Implementation Plan will be done locally

  • Stakeholders will have the opportunity to participate in the plan development

    • Steering Committee, Working Groups

    • Public meetings

  • Guidance Manual for Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plans


Integration with other watershed plans

Integration with other Watershed Plans

  • Multiple water quality programs and activities may be underway in individual watersheds

  • Each plan has specific geographical boundaries and goals

  • TMDL implementation will be coordinated with other water quality plans such as:

    • Watershed / Conservation Roundtables

    • Local Comprehensive Plans

Potential funding ource

Potential Funding $ource$

  • Potential funding sources for best management practices (BMPs) selected during Implementation Plan development:

    • USDA Programs - CREP/EQIP

    • WQIA projects

    • Section 319 Funds

    • State Revolving Loan Funds

    • Cost-Share Program

    • Tax Credits

Tmdl 3 part process1

TMDL- 3 Part Process:

  • TMDL development

  • Implementation Plan development

  • Implement the plan

Status of implementation plan development in virginia

Status of Implementation Plan Development in Virginia

  • 9 IPs are completed, 7 are currently being implemented

  • 8 additional IPs are under development

  • 2 additional IPs are in start-up phase

  • 48 stream segments will be improved with IPs to be completed by early 2006

Status of big otter tmdl

Status of Big Otter TMDL

  • DEQ public meetings were held on:

    • March 16, 2000

    • April 25, 2000

    • May 23, 2000

    • The draft TMDL report was presented to the public on August 2, 2000

  • Approved by EPA February 2, 2001

  • Approved by State Water Control Board (SWCB) June 17, 2004

Status of big otter tmdl implementation plan development

Status of Big Otter TMDL Implementation Plan Development

  • Informational meetings were held on:

    • September 9, 2004 in Bedford County

    • November 1, 2004 in Campbell County

    • Jason Ericson (DCR) met with the Campbell County Board of Supervisors on December 6, 2004

Why do a tmdl implementation plan ip

Why do a TMDL Implementation Plan(IP)?

  • The implementation plan will open the door to funding that can fund technical assistance and the implementation of Agricultural and Urban BMPs through an implementation project once the plan is completed and approved.

  • The ultimate goal of the Implementation plan is improving water quality through a cooperative partnership in the Big Otter Watershed.

Why do a tmdl implementation plan for big otter watershed

TMDL Implementation Plan Development Big Otter Watershed

First Public Meeting

May 19, 2005



  • Description of watershed

  • Overview of bacteria source characterization

  • Overview of TMDL development and Allocation Scenarios

  • Description of TMDL Implementation Plan development process

Tmdl implementation plan

TMDL Implementation Plan

Implementation Guidance Manual

  • Document that details actions or strategies that must be undertaken to achieve load reductions to ensure that water quality standards are met.


Landuse distribution percent of total area

Landuse Distribution(Percent of Total Area)

1998 and 2004 bacterial impairments

1998 and 2004 Bacterial Impairments

*note that the Buffalo Creek impairment is listed as an extension of the Big Otter River

Percent of samples exceeding water quality standard

Percent of Samples Exceeding Water Quality Standard

Why do a tmdl implementation plan for big otter watershed








Humans and Pets

Sources and Distribution of Bacteria

Why do a tmdl implementation plan for big otter watershed





Expert Group










Bacteria Source Characterization

Linking sources to water quality



• Runoff

  • Bacteria load

Linking sources to water quality


  • Soils

  • Weather

  • Land-use

  • Pollutant sources

Models are used to predict how watersheds respond and to evaluate pollutant reduction options

Why do a tmdl implementation plan for big otter watershed

Stream Network and Subwatersheds

Why do a tmdl implementation plan for big otter watershed







Fate and Transport of Bacteria: Livestock




Why do a tmdl implementation plan for big otter watershed

Fate and Transport of Bacteria: Wildlife









Why do a tmdl implementation plan for big otter watershed

Fate and Transport of Bacteria:

Humans and Pets

Failing Septic System


Straight Pipe



Bacteria load allocation

Bacteria Load Allocation

  • Identify reductions from existing sources to meet water quality standards

  • Consider all sources

    • Direct contributions

      • Permitted point sources

      • Animals in the stream

    • Indirect contributions

      • Septic systems

      • Cropland

      • Pasture

      • Residential/Urban

Allocation scenarios

Allocation Scenarios

TMDL Allocation Scenarios

Phase 1 Allocation Scenarios

Components of a tmdl ip

Components of a TMDL IP

  • Corrective Actions

  • Cost/Benefit Analysis

  • Measurable Goals and Milestones

  • Timeline to achieve water quality objectives

  • Public participation

Corrective actions bmps

Corrective Actions – BMPs

  • Assess needs

    • TMDL allocations

    • Identify best management practices (BMPs) both existing/potential

  • Spatial analysis

  • Define resources/constraints

    • financial, time, staff, social…

  • Phased approach (targeting)

    • Spatial analysis/modeling

    • Most bang for the buck

Courtesy VA Department of Conservation and Recreation

Estimating fencing needs

Estimating Fencing Needs

Targeting example

Targeting Example

100 beef livestock

Cost benefit analysis

Cost/Benefit Analysis

  • Assess cost for phased/full implementation

  • Evaluate environmental benefit

  • Identify/evaluate economic benefits of implementation

  • Identify funding sources

Source: VADCR Blackwater River TMDL Implementation Plan

Measurable goals timeline

Measurable Goals/Timeline

  • Implementation milestones – stakeholders

  • Interim water quality goals – modeling

  • 5 – 10 year time frame to meet water quality standard


Public participation

Public Participation

  • Public Meetings

    • Informational

    • Solicit public participation

    • Provide a forum for public comment

  • Steering Committee

    • Direct the overall process

    • Review output from working groups

    • Review future implementation

  • Working groups

    • Address “community” issues/concerns

Public meetings

Public Notice

indicates contamination fro

m fecal matter. As a result o

f this listing and court a

ca Total Maximum Daily Load (TM

completed to d

ater quali in these streams.

The TMDL study indicated that

the reductio

ns needed were:


100% reduction in loads

0-10% reduction in.

Public Meetings

  • Outreach/notification

    • Mailings, newspapers articles, radio, flyers

  • Two Public meetings

    • May, 2005

    • January, 2006

  • Public comment period (30 days)

Stakeholder interaction schematic

Stakeholder Interaction Schematic

Working groups

Working Groups

  • Include:

    • Agriculture

    • Urban/Residential

    • Government

    • Others?

  • Meet

    • 1-2 times each

    • Summer – Early Fall 2005

Agricultural working group

Agricultural Working Group

  • Responsibilities:

    • Identify potential constraints to implementation

    • Identify alternative funding sources/partnerships

    • Review implementation strategies from an agricultural perspective

    • Identify outreach methods for engaging producers

Urban residential working group

Urban/Residential Working Group

  • Responsibilties

    • Identify possible constraints to implementation

    • Identify methods of outreach to homeowners sewage problems

    • Identify alternative funding sources/partnerships

    • Review implementation strategies from a homeowner’s perspective

Government working group

Government Working Group

  • Responsibilities:

    • Identify funding sources

    • Identify available technical resources

    • Identify appropriate “measurable” goals and timelines

    • Identify existing applicable regulatory controls

    • Identify potential parties to be responsible for implementation

Tmdl implementation plan schedule

TMDL Implementation Plan Schedule

  • May 2005: First public meeting

  • June – Sept. 2005:Working Groups/Steering

    Committee meet as needed

  • December 2005: Complete draft Big Otter TMDL IP

  • January 2006: Final public meeting

  • March 2006: Begin implementation

Steering committee

Steering Committee

  • Includes:

    • DCR, DEQ, Working Group Representatives, NRCS, Dept. of Health, local govt., SWCD, Stakeholders

  • Meet: 2-3 meetings during plan development

  • Responsibilities

    • Review technical data

    • Assess input form working groups

    • Address community concerns/suggestions

    • Guide the process

      • Are we getting “representative” inputs?

      • How can the process be improved?

Opportunity to participate

Opportunity to participate

  • The development of the Implementation Plan should be a cooperative endeavor that attains consensus.

  • All stakeholders will have opportunities to participate through “working groups” and/or the steering committee.


Questions or comments

Questions or Comments



Theresa Carter, Department of Conservation and Recreation

voice: 276.676.5527

e-mail: theresa.carter@dcr.virginia.gov

Jason Hill, Department of Environmental Quality

Voice: 540.562.6724

e-mail: jrhill@deq.virginia.gov

Brian Benham, Virginia Tech

voice: 540.231.5705

e-mail: benham@vt.edu

  • Login