1 / 31

State of the Air Quality in South Carolina

State of the Air Quality in South Carolina. Rhonda B. Thompson, P.E. Assistant Bureau Chief Bureau of Air Quality. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Clean Air Act requires EPA to review NAAQS every 5 years Litigation, court-order deadlines, accelerated schedules

etana
Download Presentation

State of the Air Quality in South Carolina

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. State of the Air Quality in South Carolina Rhonda B. Thompson, P.E. Assistant Bureau Chief Bureau of Air Quality

  2. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) • Clean Air Act requires EPA to review NAAQS every 5 years • Litigation, court-order deadlines, accelerated schedules • Six Criteria Pollutants: • Ozone (O3) • Particulate Matter (PM) • Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) • Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) • Lead (Pb) • Carbon Monoxide (CO) • States have primary responsibility for ensuring attainment (compliance) of NAAQS once established by EPA

  3. NAAQS Standards • Primary Standards – protect public health with an ample margin of safety (especially children, the elderly, and persons with respiratory problems) • Secondary Standards – protect public welfare (soil, water, visibility wildlife, crops, vegetation, national monuments, buildings)

  4. NAAQS Designations & Boundaries • Designations • “Attainment”, “Non-attainment”, “Unclassifiable” • Ambient monitoring stations (3-year averages) • Boundaries • partial counties, metropolitan planning organization (MPO) boundaries, entire county, metropolitan statistical areas (MSA), or larger • Can cross state lines (NC, GA)

  5. Designations • “Attainment” • Meeting the standard, in compliance • “Unclassifiable” • Cannot be classified, lack of available data • “Non-attainment” • Not meeting the standard, non-compliance • Classifications: extreme, severe, moderate, marginal

  6. Non-attainment Designation Impacts • Public Health Impacts • Respiratory illnesses, irritations • Sensitive populations most at risk • Air Permitting Impacts • More stringent control devices ($) • Purchase offsets within area • Economic Impact • Vehicle Inspection & Maintenance (I&M) program • Transportation Conformity • Possibly less industry growth

  7. SIP Process • State Implementation Plan (SIP) • Written plan showing how State will get back into attainment, continue to attain standards • Available Tools: • National/federal measures – mobile sources (fuel economy standards, etc) and industry standards • State standards, revisions • Air permit restrictions • Voluntary measures – working with local government, industry, public

  8. Voluntary Measures • Lawn mower exchanges • Gas can exchanges • Car Care events • Anti-open burning campaigns • Anti-idling campaigns • Carpooling/Rideshare programs • School bus retrofits (grant funding, enforcement settlements)

  9. Ozone NAAQS • How formed? VOC and NOx react in the presence of heat and sunlight, also known as “smog” • March 2008: EPA reduced standard from 0.08 ppm to 0.075 ppm • September 2009: New EPA Administration announced it would reconsider 2008 standard • Outside CASAC’s recommended range • January 19, 2010 – new proposed range • Primary: 0.060 – 0.070 ppm • Secondary: 7-15 ppm

  10. Ozone NAAQS • August 31, 2010 – EPA finalizes standards • January 2011 – States must submit recommended non-attainment/ attainment boundaries • April 2011 – EPA will propose boundaries in Federal Register • August 2011 – EPA finalizes boundaries in Federal Register • December 2013 – SIPs due to EPA • 2014 – 2031 – States demonstrate attainment (depending on severity)

  11. Ozone 2010 Summary

  12. PM2.5 NAAQS • Particulate matter with a diameter < 2.5 microns in size (also called “PM fine”) • Not visible to naked eye, penetrate deep in lungs, more harmful than PM10 • Combustion sources (stationary and mobile) • Current Standard • Primary Annual average: 15 ug/m3 • Primary 24-hr average: 35 ug/m3 • Secondary: Same as primary • No South Carolina monitor currently exceeding daily or annual standard (1 “unclassifiable” area)

  13. PM2.5 NAAQS • Next proposed standard 11/2010 • Finalize standard 07/2011 • Suggested Proposed Scenarios • Annual: 12 – 13 µg/m3 (range) • 24-hr: stay at 35 µg/m3; or 30 - 35 µg/m3 (range) OR • Annual: 10 – 11 µg/m3 (range) • 24-hr: 25 - 30 µg/m3 (range)

  14. NO2 NAAQS • Largest contributors: mobile vehicles, power plants, industrial sources burning fuel • New standard finalized January 22, 2010; effective April 12, 2010 • New 1-hr standard (100 ppb); annual standard retained (53 ppb) • South Carolina currently attaining the standard statewide • Additional monitors in largest metropolitan areas ($$) • Possible “near road” monitors near busiest interstates ($$, safety) • Many facilities having difficulty meeting 1-hr modeling requirements for air permits

  15. SO2 NAAQS • December 2009: New SO2 1-hr standard proposed range (50 – 100 ppb) • June 2, 2010: SO2 final rule (75 ppb); effective August 1, 2010 • Irmo monitor reading ~ 80 ppb • New hybrid monitor/modeling approach: states may use refined modeling to demonstrate compliance • Areas deemed “unclassifiable” without adequate monitoring data or modeling • Additional monitors may be needed in Charlotte and Augusta areas

  16. Lead NAAQS • Largest contributors: lead-based fuels (aviation), lead processing industries • November 2008: New lead standard; 10-fold decrease – 150 ng/m3 (new standard) • South Carolina attaining the standard statewide • Additional monitoring at Parklane (Columbia) • Large lead emitters (emissions > 1 ton/year) require site-specific monitor (proposed rule to lower site-specific monitoring threshold to ½ ton/year) • Some new facilities will require site-specific monitors

  17. CO NAAQS • All areas in South Carolina meet current standard • October 29, 2010: New CO standard will be proposed • May 12, 2011: EPA finalizes new CO standard

  18. What you can do now? • Review all proposed standards and submit written comments to the EPA • Push for national multi-pollutant strategies • Participate in local partnerships/stakeholder groups • Participate in upcoming boundary meetings • Take actions to reduce emissions • Voluntary measures • Reduce energy consumption

  19. Questions Rhonda B. Thompson, P.E. Assistant Bureau Chief Bureau of Air Quality – SCDHEC (803)898-4391 thompsrb@dhec.sc.gov

More Related