1 / 16

Overview of Non-Parametric Probability Density Estimation Methods

Overview of Non-Parametric Probability Density Estimation Methods. Sherry Towers State University of New York at Stony Brook. All kernal PDF estimation methods (PDE’s) are developed from a simple idea…

ena
Download Presentation

Overview of Non-Parametric Probability Density Estimation Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview of Non-Parametric Probability Density Estimation Methods Sherry Towers State University of New York at Stony Brook

  2. All kernal PDF estimation methods (PDE’s) are developed from a simple idea… If a data point lies in a region where clustering of signal MC is tight, and bkgnd MC is loose, the point is likely to be signal

  3. To estimate a PDF, PDE’s use the idea that any continuous function can be modelled by sum of some “kernal” function • Gaussian kernals are a good choice for particle physics • So, a PDF can be estimated by sum of multi-dimensional Gaussians centred about MC generated points

  4. Best form of Gaussian kernal is a matter of debate: • Static-kernal PDE method uses a kernal with covariance matrix obtained from entire sample • The Gaussian Expansion Method (GEM), uses an adaptive kernal; the covariance matrix used for the Gaussian at each MC point comes from “local” covariance matrix.

  5. GEM vs Static-Kernal PDE • GEM gives unbiased estimate of PDF, but slower to use because local covariance must be calculated for each MC point • Static-kernal PDE methods have smaller variance, and are faster to use, but yield biased estimates of the PDF

  6. Comparison of GEM and static-kernal PDE:

  7. PDE vs Neural Networks • Both PDE’s and Neural Networks can take into account non-linear correlations in parameter space • Both methods are, in principle, equally powerful • For most part they perform similarly in an “average” analysis

  8. PDE vs Neural Networks • But, PDE’s have far fewer parameters, and algorithm is more intuitive in nature (easier to understand)

  9. Plus, PDE estimate of PDF can be visually examined:

  10. PDE’s vs Neural Nets… • There are some problems that are particularly well suited to PDE’s:

  11. PDE’s vs Neural Nets…

  12. PDE’s vs Neural Nets…

  13. PDE’s vs Neural Nets…

  14. Summary • PDE methods are as powerful as neural networks, and offer an interesting alternative • Very few parameters, easy to use, easy to understand, and yield unbinned estimate of PDF that user can examine in the multidimensional parameter space!

More Related