1 / 65

Including ALL Students & Positive School Culture

Including ALL Students & Positive School Culture. Tim Lewis & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS September 18, 2008 www.pbis.org Lewistj@missouri.edu George.sugai@uconn.edu. www.pbis.org. PURPOSE

ena
Download Presentation

Including ALL Students & Positive School Culture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Including ALL Students & Positive School Culture Tim Lewis & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS September 18, 2008 www.pbis.org Lewistj@missouri.edu George.sugai@uconn.edu

  2. www.pbis.org

  3. PURPOSE Provide brief overview of features, practices & systems of positive school culture for EVERYONE in school

  4. School-wide Positive Behavior Support2 Parts G: Principles & Features T: Practices & Data

  5. “141 Days!” Intermediate/senior high school with 880 students reported over 5,100 office discipline referrals in one academic year. Nearly 2/3 of students have received at least one office discipline referral.

  6. 5,100 referrals = 76,500 min @15 min = 1,275 hrs = 159 days @ 8 hrs

  7. BIG IDEA Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, durable, & scalable (Zins & Ponti, 1990)

  8. Evaluation Criteria

  9. SWPBS is for EVERYONE by….

  10. What is School-wide Positive Behavior Support (PBIS)?

  11. Integrated Elements Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior DATA SYSTEMS PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior

  12. Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT FEW ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% SOME Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ALL ~80% of Students

  13. Response to Intervention RtI

  14. GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS Team Agreements Data-based Action Plan Evaluation Implementation

  15. SWPBS Practices School-wide Classroom • Smallest # • Evidence-based • Biggest, durable effect Family Non-classroom Student

  16. ESTABLISHING A CONTINUUM of SWPBS • TERTIARY PREVENTION • Function-based support • Wraparound • Person-centered planning • TERTIARY PREVENTION ~5% ~15% • SECONDARY PREVENTION • Check in/out • Targeted social skills instruction • Peer-based supports • Social skills club • SECONDARY PREVENTION • PRIMARY PREVENTION • Teach SW expectations • Proactive SW discipline • Positive reinforcement • Effective instruction • Parent engagement • PRIMARY PREVENTION ~80% of Students

  17. Implementation Levels Country State District School Classroom Student

  18. PBS Systems Implementation Logic Visibility PBS Implementation Blueprint www.pbis.org Funding Political Support Leadership Team Active & Integrated Coordination Training Evaluation Coaching Local School Teams/Demonstrations

  19. SUSTAINABLE IMPLEMENTATION & DURABLE RESULTS THROUGH CONTINUOUS REGENERATION Continuous Self-Assessment Relevance Priority Efficacy Fidelity Valued Outcomes Effective Practices Practice Implementation Local Implementation Capacity

  20. Tim: More Data & Examples Tim

  21. Impact of SW-PBS: Implications For Educators Concerned with Children and Youth At-risk and Those with Disabilities Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri

  22. Starting Point • We can’t “make” students learn or behave • We can create environments to increase the likelihood students learn and behave • Environments that increase the likelihood are guided by a core curriculum and implemented with consistency and fidelity

  23. Universal School-Wide Features • Clearly define expected behaviors (Rules) • Procedures for teaching & practicing expected behaviors • Procedures for encouraging expected behaviors • Procedures for discouraging problem behaviors • Procedures for record-keeping and decision making

  24. Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students

  25. Benton

  26. Enrollment 200 50% free and reduced lunch Ages 13 and up Serves 8 component districts Physically Impaired Autism Language Impaired Hearing Impaired Multiple/ Severe Disabilities Emotional/ Behavioral Disorder Self-contained Special Education Building - St. Louis

  27. Self Contained School • Supported by PBS Coach • Prior to implementing school-wide system, Identified 33 students (17%) with chronic behavior teachers felt would require intensive individualized plans

  28. Reported Results • Reduction in inappropriate behavior (verbal aggression, sleeping in class, off task, disruption) • Increased prosocial behaviors and task completion • Post universal systems, only 5 students (2%) required intensive individualized support plans

  29. Prevention & Supports For Identified and At-risk Students Social Behavior

  30. Does Implementation of SW-PBS improve individual interventions? • Illinois “profile” analysis. • Assessment of intervention effectiveness Very Low, Low, Med, High, Very High 0 1 2 3 4 • School-wide • Individual Intervention

  31. t = 11.11 (335) p< .0001 • t = 2.30 (27) p < .03 N=223 N=38 N=17 N=169 Partial N=169 Full N=223 Partial N=17 Full N=38

  32. Mental Health Outcomes • Does School-wide SW-PBS fit within a comprehensive mental health model of prevention and intervention? Minimizing and reducing “risk factors” by building “protective factors”

  33. A&D = Alcohol and Drug; ABS = Anti-social Behavior Scale

  34. Impact on Moving Students to More Restrictive Settings Columbia Public Schools • Elementary Schools who implement SW-PBS referred students to alternative/special school at lower rates compared to schools who were not implementing SW-PBS (r = -0.4306, p < 0.01) • Elementary Schools who implemented SW-PBS have less recidivism to alternative settings once students returned to home-school

  35. Prevention & Supports For Identified and At-risk Students Achievement

  36. Small Group and Individual Interventions Supporting Students At-Risk and those with Disabilities Within Their Home School

  37. Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students

  38. Small Group/Targeted Essential Features • Part of the continuum – must link to school-wide PBS system • Efficient and effective way to identify students • Intervention matched to presenting problem but not highly individualized

  39. Table 1. Pre- and Posttest Scores for Subjects on Dependent Variable (SSRS-T) * Significance at the .05 P Value

  40. Intensive / Individual Essential Features • Linked to school-wide system • When small group not sufficient • When problem intense and chronic • Driven by Functional Behavioral Assessment

  41. Process (FBA to PBS) Conduct functional behavioral assessment Create plan based on functional assessment outcome Develop infra-structure to support behavior change (school environment must change)

  42. Structural Analysis Setting Factors Assessment Tool • Level 1: Classroom Set-up and Structure • Level 2: Context Specific Activities • Level 3: Instructional Delivery and Tasks • Level 4: Student Behavior Stichter, J. P., Lewis, T. J., Johnson, N., & Trussell, R. (2004). Toward a structural assessment: Analyzing the merits of an assessment tool for a student with E/BD. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 25-40.

More Related