1 / 17

AN OVERVIEW OF TANZANIA’s EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING MANAGING FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS (MfDR)

2 nd Annual Meeting of the African Community of Practice (AfCOP) on MfDR held in Port Louis, Mauritius 27 th – 30 th October 2008. AN OVERVIEW OF TANZANIA’s EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING MANAGING FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS (MfDR) Presented By: Mr. Eric Shitindi

Download Presentation

AN OVERVIEW OF TANZANIA’s EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING MANAGING FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS (MfDR)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2nd Annual Meeting of the African Community of Practice (AfCOP) on MfDRheld inPort Louis, Mauritius27th – 30th October 2008 AN OVERVIEW OF TANZANIA’s EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING MANAGING FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS (MfDR) Presented By: Mr. Eric Shitindi President’s Office, Public Service Management

  2. Agenda • Introduction about Tanzania • Background • Introduction of Result Based Management (RBM) to TZ Public Service • Some Implementation challenges • Addressing the challenges • Conclusion

  3. About Tanzania • Located in East Africa • Total Area 943,000 Sq Km • Total population of about 35 million • Neighbours: Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda, Burundi, Congo DRC, Malawi, Zambia, Mozambique and Comoro • The Economy depends on Agriculture, Mining and Tourism.

  4. Tanzania Safaris

  5. Tanzania Land of Kilimanjaro

  6. Background to RBM in Tanzania • Economic difficulties of 1980s • Cost of running the Government became unsustainable • Declining service delivery to the citizens (poor services) and almost collapse of service delivery systems. • Shortage of resources and Budget not linked to resources • Outdated HR policies and Non existence of legal frameworks to enforce HR and performance management • Red tape and corruption in service delivery

  7. Background to RBM in Tanzania • RBM introduced to promote individual and institutional accountability, responsiveness and strategic thinking to service delivery. • Piloting of RBM started in Executive Agencies in 1997 • Introduction of Performance Budgeting in 1999 • Adoption of Public Service Management and Employment Policy (PSMEP) in 1999 promoting RBM and Meritocracy. • Legal framework mandating all Public institutions to implement RBM and meritocracy enacted through Public Service Act No. 8 of 2002.

  8. Introduction of Performance Management Systems (PMS) 2000 - 2007 • Use of PMS as a tool for managing performance and results was introduced in the public service from 2000 using PIM. • Implemented as part of ongoing reforms in the Public Service • The tools aimed at promoting individual and institutional accountability and responsiveness to service delivery. • Aimed at strengthening the linkage between individual objectives and organizational objectives. • PIM Tools included Strategic Planning, Annual Plans, Operational Planning (MTEF), Service Delivery Survey, Self Assessments, Client Service Charters, M&E, and Open Performance Review and Appraisal System (OPRAS).

  9. Individual Performance Agreements (PA’s) & Reviews • All public servants are required to sign performance agreements with their immediate supervisors at the beginning of financial or calendar year. Legal requirement • The PA’s stipulates the agreed objectives and targets to be met by individuals based on organisational annual plan. • Open Performance Review and Appraisal System (OPRAS) replaced the confidential system was introduced in year 2004.

  10. Implementation Challenges and Lessons • Resistance to Change (mind set) • Weak local ownership in Ministries, Departments (commitment at all levels especially Top leadership) • Supply driven vs demand driven helps to strengthen ownership • Over ambitious (too many interventions) • Shortage of skilled staff to undertake reforms • Lack of Clear Guidelines

  11. Implementation Lessons and Challenges • Management of consultants • Inter-ministerial collaborations (Are we talking the same language?) • Resources allocation and coordination problems (agencies having more than one strategic plan) • Sequencing of Interventions is important • Legal frameworks need to be in place • Lack of Incentives and sanctions • Weak Monitoring and Evaluation.

  12. Addressing challenges • National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (MKUKUTA) launched in 2005. Provides an overarching framework for: - Coordinating MDAs - resource allocation, - development management and - fighting poverty

  13. MKUKUTA is based on three clusters: - (i) growth and reduction of income poverty; (ii) improved quality of life and social well-being; and - (iii) good governance and accountability. • MKUKUTA M&E framework

  14. Coordination Framework

  15. Addressing challenges • Inter-ministerial collaborations (joint teams, joint guides) – Finance & planning, POPSM, RALG • Harmonized and simplified Medium Term Planning and budgeting guidelines • Guidelines on Client service charters and Individual Performance agreements • Performance Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting: - Result frameworks; Periodic reporting on progress in reaching targets, improving service delivery, meeting outcome indicators and financial performance (quarterly, half-year, annual and 3year outcome reports)

  16. Addressing challenges • Harmonization and Coordination of Development Partners Organized through JAST (General Budget Support & Basket Funding through SWAPs). • Deepening use of PMS tools and customization • NGOs and DPs key partners in MfDR process (PER mechanisms, independent studies, empowering citizens) • Need to simplify M&E tools is in a process to be a day to day management tool • Incentives and sanctions??? • Capacity building.

  17. THE ENDI thank you for your kind attention!!!

More Related