1 / 35

Applying the Beaver Restoration Assessment Tool in Montana

Applying the Beaver Restoration Assessment Tool in Montana. Claudine Tobalske Spatial Analysis Lab Montana Natural Heritage Program University of Montana. Goals of this presentation. Give a brief introduction of the BRAT model Describe the input datasets used for Montana

dugger
Download Presentation

Applying the Beaver Restoration Assessment Tool in Montana

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Applying theBeaver Restoration Assessment Tool in Montana Claudine Tobalske Spatial Analysis Lab Montana Natural Heritage Program University of Montana

  2. Goals of this presentation Give a brief introduction of the BRAT model Describe the input datasets used for Montana Present known and expected outputs

  3. Why BRAT? • Beavers are “ecosystem engineers”; • Affordable, effective alternative to human-engineered stream restoration projects; • Unrealistic expectations? Conflicts with other activities • HSI models: system specific; use absence as proxy for habitat inappropriateness • BRAT: predicts the capacity of a landscape to support dam building(not habitat suitability or population estimates) • Regional planning tool to develop reasonable expectations of where restoration efforts are most likely to succeed.

  4. BRAT Toolbox

  5. BRAT: data requirements Dam Building Capacity: Conservation Restoration: Stream drainage network Current vegetation Historic vegetation Digital Elevation Model Low flow equation Peak flow equation Road network Railroad network Canals Land use raster Valley bottoms

  6. BRAT: data requirements Dam Building Capacity: Conservation Restoration: Stream drainage network Current vegetation Historic vegetation Digital Elevation Model Low flow equation Peak flow equation Road network Railroad network Canals Land use raster Valley bottoms

  7. Stream drainage network (8-digit HUC) Start with NHDFlowline Select perennial streams Add named streams Data source: National Hydrology Dataset High Resolution

  8. Stream drainage network Stream network split into 300m segments

  9. BRAT: data requirements Dam Building Capacity: Conservation Restoration: Stream drainage network Current vegetation Historic vegetation Digital Elevation Model Low flow equation Peak flow equation Road network Railroad network Canals Land use raster Valley bottoms

  10. Current vegetation Data source: Montana Landcover

  11. Current vegetation: coding

  12. Current vegetation, coded Data source: Montana Landcover

  13. BRAT: data requirements Dam Building Capacity: Conservation Restoration: Stream drainage network Current vegetation Historic vegetation Digital Elevation Model Low flow equation Peak flow equation Road network Railroad network Canals Land use raster Valley bottoms

  14. Historic vegetation Data source: Landfire Biophysical Settings (BPS) as proxy

  15. Historic vegetation, coded Data source: Landfire Biophysical Settings (BPS) as proxy

  16. Current vegetation, coded Data source: Montana Landcover

  17. Current vegetation, coded Data source: Montana Landfire 2012

  18. BRAT: data requirements Dam Building Capacity: Conservation Restoration: Stream drainage network Current vegetation Historic vegetation Digital Elevation Model Low flow equation Peak flow equation Road network Railroad network Canals Land use raster Valley bottoms

  19. Peak flow (2-year flood) equations • A = HUC area (square miles) • P = mean annual precipitation (inches), source: PRISM • ETSPR =mean spring (March-June) evapotranspiration (inches/month), source: Montana Climate Office • F = % HUC that is forest, source: Montana land cover • SLP50 = % HUC withslope > 50%, SLP30 = % HUC with slope > 30%, E5000 = % HUC above 5000’ elevation, and E6000 = % HUC above 6000’ elevation, source: 10 m DEM. Data source: Montana Streamstats Report 2015-5019, Chapter F

  20. Low flow equations • Low flow equations unavailable for 4 • hydrologic regions; • Replace with October discharge values for all gauging stations available within the region; • Average over available years and across the region Data source: Montana Streamstats Report 2015-5019, Chapter G

  21. BRAT: data requirements Dam Building Capacity: Conservation Restoration: Stream drainage network Current vegetation Historic vegetation Digital Elevation Model Low flow equation Peak flow equation Road network Railroad network Canals Land use raster Valley bottoms

  22. Human impacts Data source: Montana MSDI Transportation Dataset (roads/railroads); NHD HighRes (canals)

  23. BRAT: data requirements Dam Building Capacity: Conservation Restoration: Stream drainage network Current vegetation Historic vegetation Digital Elevation Model Low flow equation Peak flow equation Road network Railroad network Canals Land use raster Valley bottoms

  24. Human impacts Data source: Montana landcover

  25. BRAT: data requirements Dam Building Capacity: Conservation Restoration: Stream drainage network Current vegetation Historic vegetation Digital Elevation Model Low flow equation Peak flow equation Road network Railroad network Canals Land use raster Valley bottoms

  26. Human impacts constrained to valley bottoms Data source: 10m DEM, Valley Bottom Mapping Tool (RSAC)

  27. BRAT outputs Dam Building Capacity: Conservation Restoration: Baseflowstreampower/ High flow streampower • Existing dam building • capacity Existing complex size capacity Historic dam building capacity • Historic complex size • capacity Conflict potential Beaver management zones Beaver management zones V2 beta

  28. BRAT outputs

  29. BRAT outputs

  30. BRAT: expected outputs (based on layer files)

  31. BRAT: expected outputs (based on website)

  32. BRAT: limitations/issues Work in progress; stable release at unknown date Outputs only as good as inputs: landcover, NHD inaccuracy/errors; missing low flow equations Model developed for Utah; extrapolation to Montana?

  33. BRAT: what’s next? • An WebGIS application that would allow users to: • Explore and visualize BRAT runs for the Western US in a Google Maps interface • Run and produce simple BRAT scenarios • Export BRAT outputs as KML or shapefiles • An ArcGIS AddIn with Project Explorer to make it easier to run BRAT; • A stand-alone GUI application (without mapping functionality).

  34. BRAT: what’s next? • Complement BRAT with R-CAT (Riparian Condition Assessment Toolbox) to plan and prioritize projects, help researchers and managers assess riparian condition and recovery potential over large regions and watersheds: • V-BET: Valley Bottom Extraction Tool; • RVD: Riparian Vegetation Departure tool; • RCA: Riparian Condition Assessment tool; • RRP: Riparian Recovery Potential tool.

  35. Questions? For more information: Claudine Tobalske Claudine.tobalske@umontana.edu 406-243-5196 http://brat.riverscapes.xyz/ http://rcat.riverscapes.xyz/

More Related