1 / 52

The fall of Classical Physics

The fall of Classical Physics. Classical physics: Fundamental Models. Particle Model (particles, bodies) Motion in 3 dimension; for each time t, position and speed are known (they are well-defined numbers, regardless we know them). Mass is known. Systems and rigid objects

donoma
Download Presentation

The fall of Classical Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The fall of Classical Physics

  2. Classical physics: Fundamental Models • Particle Model (particles, bodies) • Motion in 3 dimension; for each time t, position and speed are known (they are well-defined numbers, regardless we know them). Mass is known. • Systems and rigid objects • Extension of particle model • Wave Model (light, sound, …) • Generalization of the particle model: energy is transported, which can be spread (de-localized) • Interference

  3. Classical physics at the end of XIX Century • Scientists are convinced that the particle and wave model can describe the evolution of the Universe, when folded with • Newton’s laws (dynamics) • Description of forces • Maxwell’s equations • Law of gravity. • … • We live in a 3-d world, and motion happens in an absolute time. Time and space (distances) intervals are absolute. • The Universe is homogeneous and isotropical; time is homogeneous. • Relativity • The physics entities can be described either in the particle or in the wave model. • Natura non facit saltus (the variables involved in the description are continuous).

  4. Something is wrongRelativity, continuity, wave/particle (I) • Maxwell equations are not relativistically covariant! • Moreover, a series of experiments seems to indicate that the speed of light is constant (Michelson-Morley, …) A speed!

  5. Something is wrong Relativity, continuity, wave/particle (IIa) • In the beginning of the XX century, it was known that atoms were made of a heavy nucleus, with positive charge, and by light negative electrons • Electrostatics like gravity: planetary model • All orbits allowed • But: electrons, being accelerated, should radiate and eventually fall into the nucleus

  6. Something is wrong Relativity, continuity, wave/particle (IIb) • If atoms emit energy in the form of photons due to level transitions, and if color is a measure of energy, they should emit at all wavelengths – but they don’t

  7. Something is wrong Relativity, continuity, wave/particle (III) • Radiation has a particle-like behaviour, sometimes • Particles display a wave-like behaviour, sometimes • => In summary, something wrong involving the foundations: • Relativity • Continuity • Wave/Particle duality

  8. Need for a new physics • A reformulation of physics was needed • This is fascinating!!! Involved philosophy, logics, contacts with civilizations far away from us… • A charming story in the evolution of mankind • But… just a moment… I leaved up to now with classical physics, and nothing bad happened to me! • Because classical physics fails at very small scales, comparable with the atom’s dimensions, 10-10 m, or at speeds comparable with the speed of light, c ~ 3 108 m/s Under usual conditions, classical physics makes a good job. • Warning: What follows is logically correct, although sometimes historically inappropriate.

  9. ILight behaves like a particle, sometimes

  10. 1) Photoelectric Effect • The photoelectric effect occurs when light incident on certain metallic surfaces causes electrons to be emitted from those surfaces • The emitted electrons are called photoelectrons • When the system is kept in the dark, the ammeter reads zero • When plate E is illuminated, a current is detected by the ammeter • The current arises from photoelectrons emitted from the negative plate (E) and collected at the positive plate (C)

  11. Photoelectric Effect, Interpretation • Electrons are trapped in the metal, by a potential V > Ve • Light might give to the electrons enough energy Eg to escape • Electrons ejected possess a kinetic energy K = Eg - eV • Kmax = Eg – f • f = eVe is called the work function • The work function represents the minimum energy with which an electron is bound in the metal • Typically, f ~ 4 eV

  12. At large values of DV, the current reaches a maximum value • All the electrons emitted at E are collected at C • The maximum current increases as the intensity of the incident light increases • When DV is negative, the current drops • When DV is equal to or more negative than DVs, the current is zero

  13. Photoelectric Effect Feature 1 • Dependence of photoelectron kinetic energy on light intensity • Classical Prediction • Electrons should absorb energy continually from the electromagnetic waves • As the light intensity incident on the metal is increased, the electrons should be ejected with more kinetic energy • Experimental Result • The maximum kinetic energy is independent of light intensity • The current goes to zero at the same negative voltage for all intensity curves

  14. Photoelectric Effect Feature 2 • Time interval between incidence of light and ejection of photoelectrons • Classical Prediction • For very weak light, a measurable time interval should pass between the instant the light is turned on and the time an electron is ejected from the metal • This time interval is required for the electron to absorb the incident radiation before it acquires enough energy to escape from the metal • Experimental Result • Electrons are emitted almost instantaneously, even at very low light intensities • Less than 10-9 s

  15. Photoelectric Effect Feature 3 • Dependence of ejection of electrons on light frequency • Classical Prediction • Electrons should be ejected at any frequency as long as the light intensity is high enough • Experimental Result • No electrons are emitted if the incident light falls below some cutoff frequency, ƒc • The cutoff frequency is characteristic of the material being illuminated • No electrons are ejected below the cutoff frequency regardless of intensity

  16. Photoelectric Effect Feature 4 • Dependence of photoelectron kinetic energy on light frequency • Classical Prediction • There should be no relationship between the frequency of the light and the electron maximum kinetic energy • The kinetic energy should be related to the intensity of the light • Experimental Result • The maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons increases with increasing light frequency

  17. Cutoff Frequency • The lines show the linear relationship between K and ƒ • The slope of each line is independent of the metal h ~ 6.6 10-34 Js • The absolute value of the y-intercept is the work function • The x-intercept is the cutoff frequency • This is the frequency below which no photoelectrons are emitted Kmax = hƒ – f

  18. Photoelectric Effect Featuresand Photon Model explanation • The experimental results contradict all four classical predictions • Einstein interpretation: All electromagnetic radiation can be considered a stream of quanta, called photons • A photon of incident light gives all its energy hƒ to a single electron in the metal • h is called the Planck constant, and plays a fundamental role in Quantum Physics

  19. Photon Model Explanation • Dependence of photoelectron kinetic energy on light intensity • Kmax is independent of light intensity • K depends on the light frequency and the work function • The intensity will change the number of photoelectrons being emitted, but not the energy of an individual electron • Time interval between incidence of light and ejection of the photoelectron • Each photon can have enough energy to eject an electron immediately • Dependence of ejection of electrons on light frequency • There is a failure to observe photoelectric effect below a certain cutoff frequency, which indicates the photon must have more energy than the work function in order to eject an electron • Without enough energy, an electron cannot be ejected, regardless of the light intensity

  20. Photon Model Explanation of the Photoelectric Effect, final • Dependence of photoelectron kinetic energy on light frequency • Since Kmax = hƒ – f, as the frequency increases, the maximum kinetic energy will increase • Once the energy of the work function is exceeded • There is a linear relationship between the kinetic energy and the frequency

  21. Cutoff Frequency and Wavelength • The cutoff frequency is related to the work function through ƒc = f / h • The cutoff frequency corresponds to a cutoff wavelength • Wavelengths greater than lc incident on a material having a work function f do not result in the emission of photoelectrons

  22. 2) The Compton Effect • Compton dealt with Einstein’s idea of photon momentum • Einstein: a photon with energy E carries a momentum of E/c = hƒ / c • According to the classical theory, electromagnetic waves of frequency ƒo incident on electrons should scatter, keeping the same frequency – they scatter the electron as well…

  23. Compton’s experiment showed that, at any given angle, only one frequency of radiation is observed • The graphs show the scattered x-ray for various angles • Again, treating the photon as a particle of energy hf explains the phenomenon. The shifted peak, l‘> l0, is caused by the scattering of free electrons • This is called the Compton shift equation (wait the relativity week…)

  24. Compton Effect, Explanation • The results could be explained, again, by treating the photons as point-like particles having • energy hƒ • momentum hƒ / c • Assume the energy and momentum of the isolated system of the colliding photon-electron are conserved • Adopted a particle model for a well-known wave • The unshifted wavelength, lo, is caused by x-rays scattered from the electrons that are tightly bound to the target atoms • The shifted peak, l', is caused by x-rays scattered from free electrons in the target

  25. 3) Blackbody radiation • Every object at T > 0 radiates electromagnetically, and absorbes radiation as well Stefan-Boltzmann law: • Blackbody: the perfect absorber/emitter “Black” body • Classical interpretation: atoms in the object vibrate; since <E> ~ kT, the hotter the object, the more energetic the vibration, the higher the frequency • The nature of the radiation leaving the cavity through the hole depends only on the temperature of the cavity walls

  26. Experimental findings & classical calculation • Wien’s law: the emission peaks at Example: for Sun T ~ 6000K • But the classical calculation (Rayleigh-Jeans) gives a completely different result… • Ultraviolet catastrophe

  27. Experimental findings & classical calculation • Classical calculation (Raileigh-Jeans): the blackbody is a set of oscillators which can absorb any frequency, and in level transition emit/absorb quanta of energy: No maximum; a ultraviolet catastrophe should absorb all energy Experiment

  28. Planck’s hypothesis • Only the oscillation modes for which E = hf are allowed…

  29. Interpretation n E 4 4hf 3 3hf 2 2hf 1 hf • Elementary oscillators can have only quantized energies, which satisfy E=nhf (h is an universal constant, n is an integer –quantum- number) • Transitions are accompanied by the emission of quanta of energy (photons) • The classical calculation is accurate for large wavelengths, and is the limit for h -> 0

  30. Which lamp emits e.m. radiation ? 1) A 2) B 3) A & B 4) None

  31. 4) Particle-like behavior of light:now smoking guns… • The reaction has been recorded millions of times…

  32. Bremsstrahlung • "Bremsstrahlung" means in German "braking radiation“; it is the radiation emitted when electrons are decelerated or "braked" when they are fired at a metal target. Accelerated charges give off electromagnetic radiation, and when the energy of the bombarding electrons is high enough, that radiation is in the x-ray region of the electromagnetic spectrum. It is characterized by a continuous distribution of radiation which becomes more intense and shifts toward higher frequencies when the energy of the bombarding electrons is increased.

  33. Summary • The wave model cannot explain the behavior of light in certain conditions • Photoelectric effect • Compton effect • Blackbody radiation • Gamma conversion/Bremsstrahlung • Light behaves like a particle, and has to be considered in some conditions as made by single particles (photons) each with energy h ~ 6.6 10-34 Js is called the Planck’s constant

  34. IIParticles behave like waves, sometimes

  35. Summary of last lecture • The wave model cannot explain the behavior of light in certain conditions • Photoelectric effect • Compton effect • Blackbody radiation • Gamma conversion • Light behaves like a particle, and has to be considered in some conditions as made by single particles (photons) each with energy h ~ 6.6 10-34 Js is called the Planck’s constant

  36. Should, symmetrically, particles display radiation-like properties? • The key is a diffraction experiment: do particles show interference? • A small cloud of Ne atoms was cooled down to T~0. It was then released and fell with zero initial velocity onto a plate pierced with two parallel slits of width 2 mm, separated by a distance of d=6 mm. The plate was located H=3.5 cm below the center of the laser trap. The atoms were detected when they reached a screen located D=85 cm below the plane of the two slits. This screen registered the impacts of the atoms: each dot represents a single impact. The distance between two maxima, y, is 1mm. • The diffraction pattern is consistent with the diffraction of waves with

  37. Diffraction of electrons • Davisson & Germer 1925: Electrons display diffraction patterns !!!

  38. de Broglie’s wavelength • What is the wavelength associated to a particle? de Broglie’s wavelength: • Explains quantitatively the diffraction by Davisson and Germer…… Note the symmetry What is the wavelength of an electron moving at 107 m/s ? (smaller than an atomic length; note the dependence on m)

  39. Atomic spectra • Why atoms emit according to a discrete energy spectrum? Balmer • Something must be there...

  40. Electrons in atoms: a semiclassical model • Similar to waves on a cord, let’s imagine that the only possible stable waves are stationary… 2 r = n  n=1,2,3,… => Angular momentum is quantized (Bohr postulated it…)

  41. Hydrogen (Z=1) v m r F • NB: • In SI, ke = (1/4pe0) ~ 9 x 109 SI units • Total energy < 0 (bound state) • <Ek> = -<Ep/2> (true in general for bound states, virial theorem) Only special values are possible for the radius !

  42. Energy levels • The radius can only assume values • The smallest radius (Bohr’s radius) is • Radius and energy are related: • And thus energy is quantized:

  43. Transitions • An electron, passing from an orbit of energy Ei to an orbit with Ef < Ei, emits energy [a photon such that f = (Ei-Ef)/h]

  44. Level transitions and energy quanta • We obtain Balmer’s relation!

  45. Limitations • Semiclassical models wave-particle duality can explain phenomena, but the thing is still insatisfactory, • When do particles behave as particles, when do they behave as waves? • Why is the atom stable, contrary to Maxwell’s equations? • We need to rewrite the fundamental models, rebuilding the foundations of physics…

  46. Wavefunction • Change the basic model! • We can describe the position of a particle through a wavefunction y(r,t). This can account for the concepts of wave and particle (extension and simplification). • Can we simply use the D’Alembert waves, real waves? No…

  47. Wavefunction - II • We want a new kind of “waves” which can account for particles, old waves, and obey to F=ma. • And they should reproduce the characteristics of “real” particles: a particle can display interference corresponding to a size of 10-7 m, but have a radius smaller than 10-10 m • Waves of what, then? No more of energy, but of probability • The square of the wavefunction is the intensity, and it gives the probability to find the particle in a given time in a given place. • Waves such that F=ma? We’ll see that they cannot be a function in R, but that C is the minimum space needed for the model.

  48. SUMMARY • Close to the beginning of the XX century, people thought that physics was understood. Two models (waves, particles). But: • Quantization at atomic level became experimentally evident • Particle-like behavior of radiation: radiation can be considered in some conditions as a set of particles (photons) each with energy • Wave-like property of particles: particles behave in certain condistions as waves with wavenumber • Role of Planck’s constant, h ~ 6.6 10-34 Js • Concepts of wave and particle need to be unified: wavefunction y (r,t).

  49. L’equazione di Schroedinger

  50. Proprieta’ della funzione d’onda

More Related