1 / 17

Social Psychology & The Law

Social Psychology & The Law. Eyewitness Testimony. Often viewed by attorneys and juries as the “nail in the coffin” on a case and, as such, is weighed very heavily….but should it be? Jurors tend to overestimate the accuracy of eyewitnesses

dinah
Download Presentation

Social Psychology & The Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Social Psychology & The Law

  2. Eyewitness Testimony • Often viewed by attorneys and juries as the “nail in the coffin” on a case and, as such, is weighed very heavily….but should it be? • Jurors tend to overestimate the accuracy of eyewitnesses • The most common cause of an innocent defendant being convicted is an erroneous eyewitness • But how accurate are eyewitnesses? • What helps to improve their accuracy?

  3. Lindsay, Wells & Rumpel (1981) • Staged a theft in front of a group of students then asked them to pick the suspect out of a photo array • Varied how long the suspect was in the room and how easy he was to identify (hat, no hat, etc.) • Jurors overestimated accuracy of witness, especially in “poor” viewing conditions

  4. So we get it wrong…but why? • Acquisition: process by which people notice and attend to environmental stimuli: because we cannot perceive everything that is happening around us, we only acquire a subset of the available information • If we don’t take it all in, it’s not there for recall • Storage: process by which we store information in memory that we acquired • If we store the wrong information, we’re in trouble • Retrieval: process by which people recall information stored in memory • Can make retrieval errors, misremembering details or events

  5. Acquisition Errors • Poor viewing conditions • Suspect has disguised their appearance • Suspect is only in view for a very brief time or from a poor angle (e.g. running away) • Suspect is obscured/partially obscured by objects, other people, distorting windows, poor lighting, etc. • Focus on weapons • Victims tend to fixate on the gun, knife, etc. instead of the face of the suspect • Effects of expectations • Schemas return • Alan (social psychologist!) story • Own-race bias: we are better at recognizing faces of our own race than faces of other races

  6. Storage Errors • Reconstructive Memory: memories for an event become distorted by information encountered after the event has occurred • Misleading Questions • From investigators, friends, family, lawyers, therapists, etc. • Remember the Loftus et al. studies on eyewitness testimony?? • Source Monitoring Errors • Process whereby people try to identify the source of their memories • Is what I remember real or what someone said to me? • Remember my push-bumpers incident • “John Doe #2”

  7. Retrieval Errors • Lineups and Photo Arrays • The “Best-guest” problem • So what can we do to improve accuracy? • All possible choices resemble witness’s description • Tell witness the culprit may or may not be there • Don’t always include suspect in initial lineup • Blind the officer running the lineup to the suspect’s identity • Ask for witness confidence judgments before offering performance evaluations • Present pictures sequentially, not simultaneously • Present witnesses with pictures AND voice samples

  8. Repressed vs. Recovered vs. False Memories • Repressed Memories: events stored in memory that a person cannot/does not access • Recovered Memories: recollections of a past event (e.g. renewed retrieval) that had been forgotten or repressed • False Memory Syndrome: recalling a past traumatic event that is objectively false but accepted by the individual as true • Perhaps not productive to debate whether recovered childhood memories are true or false: there are some of each • Most fruitful to examine the conditions under which events are suppressed and under which events are truthfully recalled or planted • Goodman, Quas, Batterman-Faunce, Riddlesberger, & Kuhn (1994) • Stein (1996)

  9. But how can we tell? Did they really see what they said they saw? • Per the Supreme Court, confidence in an eye witness is an indicator of accuracy • But research has shown a modest (at best) correlation between confidence and accuracy • Accurate witnesses will generally tell you they don’t know how they picked the suspect but that they just “popped out” • Conversely, inaccurate witnesses will use a process of elimination to compare one face to another • Taking more time associated with more errors • Verbalization confounds • But can that be eliminated in present-day law enforcement?

  10. What if they’re not wrong, but lying? • Very difficult to detect liars, especially good ones • Ekman, O’Sullivan, & Frank (1999) • More experience = better detection • But beware, even the best detectors missed the lie 27% of the time

  11. Can technology do better? • Polygraph: machine that measures physiological responses (like heart rate) which theoretically betray untruthful responses to specific questions • Control Question Test vs. Guilty Knowledge Test • Yes/no questions vs. Multiple Choice questions • Only as good as the operator • Computerized Voice Stress Analysis (CVSA) • Human voice emits both AM and FM frequencies under equal amounts when not under stress • Under stress, FM diminishes changing the spectrograph image from a “triangle” to a “square” type distribution • Nearly limitless applications • Less equipment intensive than polygraph • Again, only as good as the operator

  12. Criminal Profiling: Smoke & Mirrors or Scientific Crime Fighting? • “Profilers” employed by large law enforcement agencies including federal (FBI), state (FDLE) and city (NYPD) • Usually called in when all other leads are exhausted and the crime is serial in nature • Try to provide a psychological & behavioral profile of the killer for use in capturing them, predicting their next move, or preventing further kills • Specialize in victimology (profiling the victims) too • Many elements (e.g. “homicidal triad”, racial match with victims, sexual components, etc) • Modus operandi vs. signature • But is it specific enough to be of help to cops???

  13. Juries: Just another “group?” • Usually 12 of the defendant’s “peers” who hear all testimony, see all admitted evidence, then deliberate to reach a unanimous verdict (guilty or innocent in criminal trials) or reach an impasse (“hung” jury) • Kalven & Zeisel (1966): Judges disagree with jury verdicts 25% of the time • Issues with their composition • Who is generally selected for jury duty? • Is it really a jury of the defendant’s peers? • Effects of pre-trial publicity • Voir Dire • Wegner, Wenzlaff, Kerker, & Beattie (1981)

  14. During the trial… • Lawyers present their case in 1 of 2 ways: • Story Order: present evidence according to the order in which the crime occurred • Witness Order: present witnesses in the order of most impact even if it does not follow crime sequence • Empirical support for story order

  15. Deliberations • If you have never seen the black and white version of “Twelve Angry Men”, see it • Can one lone hold-out change the minds of the other 11? Not likely. • In 97% of reviewed trials, the final decision was the same as the one favored by the majority on the initial vote • Conformity comes back into play! • Even if a minority cannot change the verdict often, they may change the severity of the verdict (juries can often consider lesser charges) • Is 6 better than (or as good as )12?

  16. Obedience to Authority…why? • Statistics show decreases in the rates of violent crimes nationwide…but why? • Deterrence Theory: hypothesis that the threat of legal punishment causes people to refrain from illegal activity as long as they perceive that punishment to be swift, certain, and severe • Correct in some cases, not in others • Punishment is particularly ineffective in animals • Many people are ignorant of the specific penalties for specific crimes…how then can they be deterred? • What about impulsive crimes? • DUI: punishment not correlated with compliance but certainty of being caught is • Moral values: right vs. wrong, just vs. unjust

  17. Dead Man Walking • Is the death penalty the ultimate deterrent? • Recall, to serve as a deterrent, punishment must be swift, certain, and severe…the death penalty is generally far from swift and usually uncertain • Does method play into deterrence? • What about crimes of passion? • What about costs of housing a killer for the rest of their lives as compared to execution? • Eye for an eye or cruel & unusual? • Are their racial implications? • Ramifications for others: Family of condemned and victims, law enforcement officials, society…

More Related