Dublin august 20 12
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 28

The 2011 Pobal HP Deprivation Index for Small Areas (SA) Conceptual Underpinnings PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 59 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Dublin, August 20 12. The 2011 Pobal HP Deprivation Index for Small Areas (SA) Conceptual Underpinnings. The Purpose of Composite Deprivation Indices. It is difficult to simultaneously comprehend the spatial distribution of multiple indicators at multiple points in time

Download Presentation

The 2011 Pobal HP Deprivation Index for Small Areas (SA) Conceptual Underpinnings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Dublin august 20 12

Dublin, August 2012

The 2011 Pobal HP Deprivation Index for Small Areas (SA)Conceptual Underpinnings


The purpose of composite deprivation indices

The Purpose of Composite Deprivation Indices

It is difficult to simultaneously comprehend the spatial distribution of multiple indicators at multiple points in time

For practical purposes, there is a need for a single indicator which draws a variety of observations together

Such indices can provide the basis for the effective targeting of the most disadvantaged areas

Such indices can provide a means by which to assess changes over time, and facilitate monitoring and evaluation

However, it is important that such indices enjoy broad support amongst all key stakeholders, including government departments, state agencies, community representatives and the broader public


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

The Purpose of Deprivation Indices


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

Requirements


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

Measurement Considerations


A comprehensive definition of poverty

A Comprehensive Definition of Poverty

  • Relative Poverty

    “People are living in poverty if their income and resources (material, cultural and social) are so inadequate as to preclude them from having a standard of living which is regarded as acceptable by Irish society generally.”

    (Government of Ireland, NAPS, 1997)

  • Relative Deprivation

    “The fundamental implication of the term deprivation is of an absence – of essential or desirable attributes, possessions and opportunities which are considered no more than the minimum by that society.”

    (Coombes et al., DoE – UK, 1995)


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

Traditional Approach: Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)

  • Ordinary Factor Analysis (EFA) reduces variables to a smaller number of underlying Dimensions or Factors

V1

F1

V2

V3

V4

V5

F2

V6

  • EFA is essentially an exploratory technique; .i.e. data-driven

  • all variables load on all factors

  • the structure matrix is the (accidental) outcome of the variables available

  • EFA cannot be used to compare outcomes over time


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

New Approach: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)

  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis also reduces observations to the underlying Factors, however

d

V1

1

L1

d

V2

2

d

V3

3

d

V4

4

d

V5

L2

5

d

V6

6

  • CFA requires a strong theoretical justification before the model is specified

  • the researcher decides which of the observed variables are to be associated with which of the latent constructs

  • variables are conceptualised as the imperfect manifestations of the latent concepts

  • CFA model allows the comparison of outcomes over time

  • CFA facilitates the objective evaluation of the quality of the model through fit statistics


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

Strengths of CFA-based Deprivation Indices

  • true multidimensionality, based on theoretical considerations

  • provides for an appropriate treatment of both urban and rural deprivation

  • no double-counting

  • rational approach to indicator selection

  • uses variety of alternative fit indices to test model adequacy

  • identical structure matrix across multiple waves

  • identical measurement scale across multiple waves

  • true distances to means are maintained (i.e. measurement, not ranking)

  • distinguishes between measurement of absolute and relative deprivation

  • allows for true inter-temporal comparisons


Overview of successive deprivation indices haase pratschke 1996 2012

Overview of Successive Deprivation Indices, Haase & Pratschke 1996 - 2012

Haase et al., 1996

Haase, 1999

Pratschke & Haase, 2001

Pratschke & Haase, 2004

Haase & Pratschke, 2005

Haase & Pratschke, 2008

Haase & Pratschke, 2010

Haase & Pratschke, 2012

Haase & Pratschke, 2011


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

The Underlying Dimensions of Social Disadvantage

  • Demographic Decline(predominantly rural)

    • population loss and the social and demographic effects of emigration (age dependency, low education of adult population)

  • Social Class Deprivation(applying in rural and urban areas)

    • social class composition, education, housing quality

  • Labour Market Deprivation(predominantly urban)

    • unemployment, lone parents, low skills base


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

The Basic Model of the

Pobal HP Deprivation Index

d

Age Dependency Rate

1

Demographic

d

Population Change

Growth

2

d

Primary Education only

3

d

Third Level Education

4

d

Persons per Room

Social Class

5

Composition

d

Professional Classes

6

d

Semi- and Unskilled Classes

7

d

Lone Parents

8

Labour Market

d

Male Unemployment Rate

Situation

9

d

Female Unemployment Rate

10


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

Solution 2:

A Longitudinal SEM Model

2006

2011


Comparison of models

Comparison of Models

Both the means model and the longitudinal model rely on the same factor model

Using the means model, it is possible to measure the change that occurred in the mean of the latent variables between 2006 and 2011

Both the means model and the longitudinal model impose equality constraints on all factor loadings

The Pobal HP Deprivation Index is estimated using a multiple group means and covariance structure model


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

Distribution of HP Index Scores, 2006 and 2011

most disadvantaged

most affluent

The Figure shows the distribution of the 2006 and 2011 Absolute HP Index Scores in 5-point ranges (one half of a standard deviation)


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

Smoothed Distribution of AbsoluteHP Index Scores, 2006 and 2011

most disadvantaged

most affluent

The Figure shows the decline by 7.0 points in the mean of the Absolute HP Index Scores between 2006 and 2011 (or 0.7 of a standard deviation)


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

Smoothed Distribution of relative HP Index Scores, 2006 and 2011

most disadvantaged

most affluent

The Figure shows the distribution of the 2006 and 2011 Relative HP Index Scores, after de-trending the absolute scores by the difference in means


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

Mapping Deprivation

most disadvantaged

most affluent


Comparison of 2006 and 2011 absolute index scores

Comparison of 2006 and 2011 Absolute Index Scores


Comparison of 2006 and 2011 relative index scores

Comparison of 2006 and 2011 relative Index Scores


Absolute index scores 2006

Absolute Index Scores2006


Absolute index scores 2011

Absolute Index Scores2011


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

Comparison of Absolute Deprivation Scores, 1991 and 2006

  • Shows the massive increase in disadvantage in wake of the recession after the 2006 Census, affecting literally every part of the country.


Relative index scores 2006

Relative Index Scores2006


Relative index scores 2011

Relative Index Scores2011


The 2011 pobal hp deprivation index for small areas sa conceptual underpinnings

Comparison of Relative Deprivation Scores, 1991 and 2006

  • The pattern between affluence and disadvantage, whereby affluence is greatest in the urban peripheries and gradually declining towards more rural locations, remains broadly intact.

  • There is some indication that the reach of the affluent commuter belts has somewhat diminished.

  • Within the Greater Dublin Area, there is a marked shift in the location of the most affluent areas. Whereas in 2006 the Western part of the Region scored high in affluence, in 2011 this is again primarily concentrated in Dun Laoghaire / Rathdown.


Change in relative index scores 2006 2011

Change in Relative Index Scores2006-2011


  • Login