1 / 31

Accountability for Student Learning

Accountability for Student Learning. ACS Overview South Asheboro MS : Tuesday, May 12, 2009 North Asheboro MS: Thursday, May 14, 2009 Jennifer C. Smith Director of Instructional Improvement. History/Background. September 2006 http://www.ncpublicschools.org/organization/mission /

Download Presentation

Accountability for Student Learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Accountability for Student Learning ACS Overview South Asheboro MS : Tuesday, May 12, 2009 North Asheboro MS: Thursday, May 14, 2009 Jennifer C. Smith Director of Instructional Improvement

  2. History/Background • September 2006 • http://www.ncpublicschools.org/organization/mission/ • State BOE adopted a mission “that every public school student will graduate from high school, globally competitive for work and postsecondary education, and prepared for life in the 21st century.” • May 2007 - January 2008 • http://www.ncpublicschools.org/acre/basis/ • Blue Ribbon Commission on Testing and Accountability presented to the SBOE recommended improvements in the current system of testing and accountability and steps toward a next generation of standards, assessments, and accountability for NC public schools. • June 5, 2008 • http://www.ncpublicschools.org/acre/basis/ • Framework for Change: The Next Generation of Assessments and Accountability October 2008 • October 2008 • http://www.ncpublicschools.org/acre/basis/ • DPI’s Response to the Framework for Change: The Next Generation of Assessments and Accountability

  3. LT 1 Built on Essential Standards LT 5 Essential Standards DRIVE DRIVE Assessments Accountability 2

  4. Essential Standards The Essential Standards are the foundation. AFramework For Change 3

  5. Essential Standards LT 1 LT 5 • Essential Standards Development will be a Strategic Process that • Is Aligned to… • National and International Standards • The Graduation Project • 21st century skills • Requires Training • Uses Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy • Involves Stakeholders 4

  6. Essential Standards LT 1 LT 5 Prioritized and Focused Six Qualities Aligned to 21st Century Skills Measurable and Concise Essential Standards Integrated with Other Content Areas Driven by Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Chosen for Endurance, Readiness and Leverage 5

  7. Assessment LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 5 A Comprehensive Balanced Assessment System 6

  8. Assessment Proposed System LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 5 • To Evaluate Knowledge… • Transparent • Appropriately Used Summative (Statewide) Benchmark (Classroom, School, District) • To Inform Instruction… • Centralized Benchmarking Tool • Systematic Formative Assessment PD Modules Formative Assessment (Classroom) Essential Standards Built on what is most important for students to learn in the 21st century 7

  9. Assessment LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 5 Formative Assessment A research-based, classroom assessment method shown to improve student achievement. Directly connected to quality instruction 8

  10. Assessment LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 5 Summative (Statewide) Benchmark (Classroom, School, District) Formative Assessment (Classroom) Essential Standards Summative Assessment Measures of achievement to provide evidence of student competence or program effectiveness. 11

  11. Assessment LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 5 Summative (Statewide) North Carolina will develop a comprehensive system in which every category of assessment is necessary and… Benchmark (Classroom, School, District) Formative Assessment (Classroom) Essential Standards Essential Standards Is in exact alignment withthe Essential Standards 13

  12. Accountability + + + Future-Ready Core + + Readiness + Graduation Rate LT 6 LT 7 Achievement (EOCs and EOGs) Growth K-12 Summative 9-12 only Benchmark Formative andBenchmarkto inform instruction Formative Essential Standards Essential Standardsto define what students must know, understand and be able to do to compete in the 21st century 15

  13. Accountability + + + Future-Ready Core + + Readiness + Graduation Rate LT 6 LT 7 Challenging and Attainable Achievement and Growth Standards Growth and Student Achievement (EOGs and EOCs) Balanced The Accountability model must ensure a balanced approach that accounts for combined measures but remains grounded in student achievement and growth. 16

  14. Timeline 2008 - 2009 2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2012 - 2013 2011 - 2012 July July July July July Math, Science, Eng 10, Comp Essential Stds. Math, Sci, Eng 10, Comp Skills Item Tryout Math, Sci, Eng 10 Comp, Skills Field Test Math, Sci, Eng 10 Comp, Skills Operational ELA and Social Studies Operational ELA, Social Studies, Others Essential Stds. ELA and Social Studies Item Tryout ELA and Social Studies Field Test Innovative Assessment Team (July 09) Benchmarking Tool Operational for Math, Science and Eng 10 (July 2011) Benchmarking Tool Operational for ELA, Social Studies and Other Subjects (July 2012) Criteria for choosing CR/PT (Aug 09) Formative PD Modules 1-5 (Aug 09) Modules 6-13(Jun 2010) Online PD Community (June 2010) Case Studies on Administering 21st Century, Computer-Based Assessments(Jan 2011) TAC on Accountability Reports (Sept 09) 20

  15. ACS VisionACS Goal/Product • Why? • ACS is committed is committed to student learning. The work we do in the area of curriculum, instruction, and assessment is ongoing and based on our constant pursuit of 4 guiding questions: • What do we want students to know, understand, and be able to do? • How will we deliver high quality instruction to help students learn what we want them to know, understand, and be able to do? • How will we assess to determine if students have learned what we want them to know, understand, and be able to do? • What will we do if students have not learned what we want them to know, understand, and be able to do? • What? • ACS is committed to the development of curriculum guides that will be used for planning instruction and assessments that result in student mastery of essential standards and objectives of the NCSCOS and are reflective of the 21st century skills students need to be future-ready graduates.

  16. ACS Curriculum GuidesSummer 2009Timeline • Who? • Core Curriculum Teams : Math, Science , Language Arts, Social Studies • When? Where? • Middle Grades June 15-18 • High School July 27-August 7 • Middle Grades/HS Vertical Meeting August 6

  17. Teachers and Administrators:Your role in this work! • Explore and discuss all resources related to the ACRE project and ACS Curriculum Guide development work. • To be completed during grade level and vertical conversations: • http://www.acsacre.wikispaces.com (More information to come!)

More Related