1 / 6

Value for Money

Value for Money. Measurement is often focused here. Resources / Investment. Service & Wider Outcomes. Money. Economic. QUALITY. Outputs. People. Inputs. Social. Environment. Environmental. Determining social value requires evidence of this relationship.

Download Presentation

Value for Money

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Value for Money Measurement is often focused here Resources / Investment Service & Wider Outcomes Money Economic QUALITY Outputs People Inputs Social Environment Environmental Determining social value requires evidence of this relationship

  2. Definition: at a very basic level, additionality is about measuring net, rather than gross, impacts. In other terms: • This can also entail capturing so-called “positive knock-on outcomes and impacts”. • It’s challenging e.g. capturing “additionality” Counter-factual Outcome Impact Contribution Displacement

  3. Impetus for the work • Internal Management/ Governance bodies • Operations: interest in economy and efficiency • Programmes: recognition of the complexity • DFID PPA • Pressure on use of public funds • Economy, and Effectiveness ‘measures’ “If you don’t define value, someone else will do it for you.”

  4. Approach - framings for Value for Money What is your organisational position on VfM? It’s about what is right for you and your organisation to make good decisions. 1) Organisational economy and efficiency • Overall quality management system • Procurement process • Overhead costs • etc. 2) Individual programmes (programme cycle) • Managing through the cycle with VfM in mind • Sometimes deeper evaluative techniques (cost effectiveness, SROI) 3) Programme portfolio management • Supporting decision-making

  5. Effectiveness in the programme cycle

  6. DFID feedback on WWF reporting ...a very good understanding of VfM …a commitment to the VfM agenda.  …the cost category/ cost driver section is strong …economy: demonstrates good practice and specific savings. …VfM ‘measures’ too vague. Did not provide ‘specific metrics’ …evidence on effectiveness is good, indicating WWF is committed to results and maximising your impact.  With the exception of the VfM measures which could be improved, we would like to congratulate WWF for your strong VfM reporting.

More Related