1 / 39

Mission Command ‘Match of the Day’

Mission Command ‘Match of the Day’. Sqn Ldr Rhys Cowsill. SCOPE. Origins. Use and Development: 1806 to Cold War. Introduction to British Military Doctrine. ‘Mechanics.’ Culture. Threats and Opportunities. MATCH OF THE DAY 14 th October 1806. PRUSSIA (Professionals and hot favourites)

cicero
Download Presentation

Mission Command ‘Match of the Day’

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mission Command‘Match of the Day’ Sqn Ldr Rhys Cowsill

  2. SCOPE • Origins. • Use and Development: 1806 to Cold War. • Introduction to British Military Doctrine. • ‘Mechanics.’ • Culture. • Threats and Opportunities.

  3. MATCH OF THE DAY14th October 1806 PRUSSIA (Professionals and hot favourites) vs FRANCE (Upstart peasants – New Manager) At Jena and Auerstadt Kick-off 3.00pm

  4. NAPOLEON

  5. SCHARNHORST

  6. SCHARNHORST ‘We fought bravely enough, but not cleverly enough.’

  7. CARL von CLAUSEWITZ ‘On War’(published posthumously 1832)

  8. CLAUSEWITZ’ LEGACY • The Fog of War. • The Friction of War. • The importance of speed of decision making.

  9. Findings of Scharnhorst’s ‘Board of Inquiry’ • The Prussian Army was run as a machine, with iron discipline, because the morale of the troops was low. • Officers tried to counter chaos of battle by using mathematical principles. • Nobody took action without orders. • Highly centralised and process-dominated. • It used ‘Befehltaktik’ – i.e. based on Orders.

  10. Findings of Scharnhorst’s ‘Board of Inquiry’ • Napoleon was able to communicate very rapidly with his Marshals. • He explained his intentions, as well as what he wanted them to do. • He expected them to use their initiative. • They did! • The result was a very high tempo – a very fast ‘OODA loop.’

  11. The OODA Loop Observation Orientation Action Decision

  12. Reforms to the Prussian Army • The need for speed of decision making was recognised. • Officers were trained and authorised to make real-time decisions at low level. • Philosophy that it was better to act now with good intentions than to wait for the ‘right’ order. • Doing nothing was a greater sin than making the wrong decision. • Orders from above could not possibly give the officer on the ground all the guidance he would need.

  13. Field Marshal Von Moltke

  14. Field Marshal Von Moltke • Father of ‘Auftragstaktik.’ • “Obedience is a principle, but the man stands above the principle.”

  15. Auftragstaktik • Senior commanders should not order more than was absolutely necessary but should ensure the goal was clear. • In case of doubt, subordinate commanders should seize the initiative.

  16. MATCH OF THE DAY 2 Franco Prussian War 1870 Return (grudge) Match FRANCE vs PRUSSIA Kick-off 3.00pm

  17. MATCH OF THE DAY 3 The Great War 1914 GERMANY (ex Prussia) vs COMBINED SERVICES (France/BEF)

  18. Match Report • Owing to muddy conditions and outstanding new goalkeeping device (machine guns), match stagnates and goes into extra time. • OODA Loop goes from ‘observation’ to ‘action’ and back again.

  19. The OODA Loop Observation Orientation Action Decision

  20. Match Report • Owing to muddy conditions and outstanding new goalkeeping device (machine guns), match stagnates and goes into extra time. • OODA Loop goes from ‘observation’ to ‘action’ and back again. • Auftragstaktik comes on as late substitute and almost wins the game.

  21. Between the Wars • Germany develops ‘an Army of 100,000 officers.’ • Training centred on ‘thinking obedience.’ • Trust becomes central to military doctrine. • Everyone expected to learn, and be able to do, the job 2 levels up. • Proves very effective in coping with and using the chaos of the battlefield.

  22. British Army (the Victors!) • Reverts to ‘huntin’ shootin’ an’ fishin.’ • Prefers to try to control the chaos of the battlefield. • Designs a ‘Master plan.’ • Master plan specifies in great detail precisely what everyone has to do. • Yet, orders are not considered absolute. • Result is a lot of debating and delay – very slow OODA Loop.

  23. The OODA Loop Observation Orientation Action Decision

  24. Royal Air Force

  25. Royal Air Force

  26. Royal Air Force • Unusually, prepares to fight the NEXT war. • Dowding designs ‘integrated defence system’ for Battle of Britain (NEC?). • Delegates responsibility for the fighting to Group Commanders. • Allows for a very fast OODA Loop.

  27. The OODA Loop Observation Orientation Action Decision

  28. Royal Air Force • Unusually, prepares to fight the NEXT war. • Dowding designs ‘integrated defence system’ for Battle of Britain (NEC?). • Delegates responsibility for the fighting to Group Commanders. • Allows for a very fast OODA Loop. • This is the main reason for the defeat of the Luftwaffe.

  29. MATCH OF THE DAY 4 Second World War 1939 ‘OLD FIRM’ GAME Venue – Various Kick-off 3.00pm

  30. Match Report • Germany has outstanding first half using Auftragstaktik from the ‘off.’ • Big wins away in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Holland, Belgium France etc. etc. • Manager substitutes Befehltaktik for Auftragstaktik just after half time. • Germany loses away in Russia (Stalingrad City). • Loses to new Combined Services (US/UK). • Loses at home trying to play 2 games at once.

  31. Cold War • Static posturing. • Everyone told what they had to do (Befehltaktik?). • Not ‘manoeuvre warfare.’ • Little need for Auftragstaktik. • But!! BAOR is seriously out-numbered and so…

  32. Field Marshal Bagnall KCB GCB CVO MC* • 1986 – Introduces principles of Auftragstaktik to UK Military doctrine and influences NATO doctrine. • Doctrine becomes known as ‘Mission Command.’ • Great idea! • ……but nobody knows about it.

  33. Mission Command • Is designed to facilitate effective action under chaotic and confusing conditions. • Is based on trust. • Is intended to unify autonomy and alignment. • The ‘mechanics’ are as follows:

  34. Mission Command • The Commander: • Briefs his intent to 2 levels down. • Explains the limitations, e.g. time, boundaries, must do, mustn’t do. • Allocates resources. • States WHAT is to be achieved, not HOW it is to be achieved. • Gives decision-making criteria.

  35. Mission Command • The Subordinate Commander: • Understands ‘my role in his plan’ 2 levels up. • Devises his own plan to play his part in achieving the commander’s intent. • Asks for more resources if needed, but offers back resources not needed. • Briefs his subordinates 2 levels down. and so forth…

  36. The Culture Required for Effective Mission Command • The Commander retains ultimate responsibility for decisions but: • He must genuinely empower his people. • He must trust his subordinates. • Everyone must act as a leader. • A decision to act now in accordance with commander’s intent, rather than to wait for orders, is imperative.

  37. Threats and Opportunities • The greatest threat to the successful implementation of Mission Command is a belief that technology will allow command to be supplanted by control. • The greatest challenge is to use Mission Command, not just in war, but in every-day episodes of leadership at all levels and to become proficient in its use.

More Related