Jameson Miller
1 / 21

Interactive Visualization of Intercluster Galaxy Structures in the Horologium-Reticulum Supercluster - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Jameson Miller UNC Chapel Hill. Cory W. Quammen UNC Chapel Hill. Interactive Visualization of Intercluster Galaxy Structures in the Horologium-Reticulum Supercluster. Matthew C. Fleenor Roanoke College. Data description. Galaxy positions in RA-DEC-cz coordinate system

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentationdownload

Interactive Visualization of Intercluster Galaxy Structures in the Horologium-Reticulum Supercluster

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Slide1 l.jpg

Jameson Miller

UNC Chapel Hill

Cory W. QuammenUNC Chapel Hill

Interactive Visualization of Intercluster Galaxy Structures in the Horologium-Reticulum Supercluster

Matthew C. FleenorRoanoke College

Data description l.jpg

Data description

  • Galaxy positions in RA-DEC-cz coordinate system

    • Right-ascension (RA) ~ longitude

    • Declination (DEC) ~ latitude

    • cz – radial dimension (recessional velocity)

  • ~2500 galaxy locations

  • ~30 clusters

Domain questions l.jpg

Domain questions

  • What is the distribution of intercluster galaxies?

  • Are there large void regions? How many?

  • Does the supercluster have filaments?

  • How do clusters fit into the structure defined by intercluster galaxies?

Standard 2d plots l.jpg

Standard 2D plots

Overvieew l.jpg


Prior 3d experience l.jpg

Prior 3D experience

  • Collaborators viewed data in immersive environment

  • Got lost – no context

Previous interactive tools l.jpg

Previous interactive tools

  • Cosmic Explorer [Song1993]

  • SGI Explorer [Christensen1995]

  • PartiView [Levy2001]

  • AstroMD [Gheller2002]

What s missing l.jpg

What’s missing

  • Ability to group galaxies into structures they define

    • Voids

    • Filaments

  • Reference axes in all three RA-DEC-cz dimensions

Data types l.jpg

Data types

  • Sparse 3D position data

  • Nominal (categorical) data

    • Intercluster galaxies vs. clusters

    • User-defined groups indicating structure (filament, void boundary)

Group 1

Group 2



Nominal encoding l.jpg

Nominal encoding

  • 3D glyphs

    • Enough screen real estate

    • Distinct shapes encode object type

    • Depth queues from perspective and occlusion

  • Nominal color encoding

    • Group membership

    • Encoded by 10 of 12 colors recommended by Ware2004

Ra dec cz reference axes l.jpg

RA-DEC-cz reference axes

  • Orientation to dataset

  • Colored with just-noticeably-different color than background

  • Can turn sides, top, and bottom on or off

Curved drop lines l.jpg

Curved drop lines

  • Explicit connection between galaxies and reference axes

  • Curved to fit RA-DEC-cz coordinate system

  • Allows comparison to standard plots

Structure perception l.jpg

Structure perception

  • Structure-from-motion

    • Strongest shape cue

  • Torsional rocking

    • Structure-from-motion without interaction

  • Stereo

    • Complements other techniques

    • User can control eye-separation parameter

Confirmation of analysis l.jpg

Confirmation of analysis

  • Quantitative analysis shows two separate overdensities

  • Overdensities pop out in visualization

  • ~95% correspondence between grouping by hand and quantitative grouping

Positive result l.jpg

Positive result

  • Quick identification of void regions

  • Selection of galaxies along rim defines bounds of void

  • Offline sphere-fitting refines estimation

  • Six voids identified

  • Known clusters reside around voids

Negative result l.jpg

Negative result

  • Previous 2D plots identified potential filament structure

  • When rotated in 3D, filament is shown to be two separate structures

Computation vs visualization l.jpg

Computation vs. visualization

  • Voids – could compute

  • Filaments – maybe could compute

  • Visualization helps astronomers know where to focus quantitative analysis

Effective techniques l.jpg

Effective techniques

  • User-controlled interaction

    • Critical for maintaining viewer orientation

    • Interactive scaling allows snapping between overview of data and local features, giving context when zooming in

    • Home key moves back to a familiar orientation

  • Torsional rocking

    • Rocking aids void definition when far galaxies peek out from closer galaxy

    • View angle optimization

  • Stereo

    • Stereo is helpful for finding galaxies bordering voids

    • Picking with mouse was hampered by stereo

    • Collaborators came across campus to use it!

Software l.jpg


  • Called GyVe (GalaxyViewer)

  • Built on VTK, Python, and Tkinter

  • Available at http://gyve.sourceforge.net/

  • Runs on Windows and Linux

Future work l.jpg

Future work

  • Isosurfaces – initial attempt unused

  • Image processing for identifying voids from density projections

  • Add interactive statistical tools

  • Haptic probes to feel around for structures

Acknowledgements l.jpg


  • NSF Grant AST 04-06443 (Fleenor)

  • James A. Rose

  • Russell M. Taylor II

  • Login