1 / 11

Performance Characteristics Of Low Volatility Vs. High Volatility ZDDP;

Performance Characteristics Of Low Volatility Vs. High Volatility ZDDP; An Alternative Argument for the Addition of a Phosphorous Volatility Test to GF-5. Dennis W. Florkowski Chris Engel. Low Volatility ZDDP.

bucknerm
Download Presentation

Performance Characteristics Of Low Volatility Vs. High Volatility ZDDP;

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Performance Characteristics Of Low Volatility Vs. High Volatility ZDDP; An Alternative Argument for the Addition of a Phosphorous Volatility Test to GF-5 Dennis W. Florkowski Chris Engel

  2. Low Volatility ZDDP • Phosphorous from engine oil reaches the exhaust system via leakage, oil consumption and volatility. • Lubricant development efforts are of particular importance in reducing phosphorous poisoning via the volatility pathway. • Specifically as ZDDP decomposes in an engine some volatile phosphorus species are known to exit the engine via the PCV system and eventually poison the exhaust catalyst. • Low Volatility ZDDP is formulated in such a way that the amount of volatile phosphorus species are significantly reduced. • OEM’s and their suppliers are interested in low volatility ZDDP’s to protect increasingly sophisticated exhaust systems. • Equally as significant, the use of low volatility ZDDP is expected to not only protect emission systems, but also to maintain excellent antiwear and antioxidant performance and provide a measurable increase in engine oil life.

  3. Vegas Field Trial (5W-30) Three Oils Were Tested: • Baseline with 0.1% Phos • Prototype 0.075% Phos Conventional ZDDP • Prototype 0.075% Phos Low Volatility ZDDP

  4. 2.7L Field Trial Drain Data Low Impact ZDP ∆ Low Volatility ZDP Fe Conventional ZDP * Conventional ZDP Fe

  5. 2.7L Field Trial Drain Data 2.7L Field Trial Data ∆ Low Volatility ZDP Fe * Conventional ZDP Fe Conventional ZDP

  6. 2.7L Field Trial Data

  7. 2.7L Field Trial Data

  8. 2.7L Field Trial Drain Data

  9. 2.7L Field Trial Drain Data

  10. Vegas Field Trial (5W-30)Drain Analysis @60,000miles Baseline Conventional Low Volatility In many catagories, the Low Volatility Phos material even outperforms the baseline oil (0.100 phos).

  11. Conclusions • Based on 60,000 miles of drain oil analysis, four cars on each formulation, Low Volatility ZDDP out performs Conventional ZDDP in all categories measured. • Based on lubricant performance alone, a reduction in phosphorous volatility will significantly improve engine oil quality for GF-5. Can we develop a test to measure phosphorous volatility in an engine?

More Related