1 / 14

Group 2 Members : Alicia Ng Yit Hui KA10177 Chan Kar Min KA10068 Elfira Binti Anuar KA10079

UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG UHL 2332 ACADEMIC REPORT WRITING SOCIAL NETWORK SITE. Group 2 Members : Alicia Ng Yit Hui KA10177 Chan Kar Min KA10068 Elfira Binti Anuar KA10079. Dr. Nik Aloesnita Nik Mohd Alwi. BACKGROUND OF STUDY. Definition. Functions. General Conception.

borka
Download Presentation

Group 2 Members : Alicia Ng Yit Hui KA10177 Chan Kar Min KA10068 Elfira Binti Anuar KA10079

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG UHL 2332 ACADEMIC REPORT WRITING SOCIAL NETWORK SITE Group 2 Members: Alicia Ng YitHuiKA10177 Chan Kar Min KA10068 ElfiraBintiAnuarKA10079 Dr. NikAloesnitaNikMohdAlwi

  2. BACKGROUND OF STUDY • Definition • Functions • General Conception

  3. Problem Statement • Misconception

  4. OBJECTIVES OF STUDY • To investigate how frequent do students access to social network site. • To examine the functions of social network site. • To investigate the use of social network site as a • medium of interaction.

  5. RESEARCH QUESTIONS • How frequent do students accesssocialnetwork site? • What are the functions of social networksite? • How do students use socialnetworksite as a medium of interaction?

  6. SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY • Frequent usage of social network site among students. • Inform the functions of social network site. • Change the misconception.

  7. SCOPE OF STUDY • Location • Number of Participants • Instrument

  8. DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS • Social network site • Interaction

  9. Literature Review • Article 1 • Title: Age differences in online social • networking – A study of user profiles • and the social capital divide among • teenagers and older users in • MySpace. • Objective: To investigate age differences and • similarities in the use of the social • network site, MySpace. • Finding: Teenagers make more use of different • media compared to older MySpace users.

  10. Article 2 • Title:Old Communication, New Literacies: Social Network Sites as Social Learning Resources • Objective: To examine the role of a social network site in the lives of high school teenagers • Findings: Myspace served as a space for emotional support, self presentation, appreciation of creative work and school-task related support

  11. Article 3 • Title: Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self expression. • Objectives: • 1) To explores teenagers’ practices of social networking in order to uncover the subtle connections between online opportunity and risk. • 2) To contrasts teenagers’ graded conception of ‘friends’ with the binary classification of social networking sites • Findings • Selves are constituted through interaction with others and, for today’s teenagers, selfactualization increasingly includes a careful negotiation between the opportunities and risks afforded by internet-mediated communication.

  12. METHODOLOGY • Participants Students both male and female aged 18-25 years old • Instrument Questionnaire • Data Collection Method • Distribute questionnaires at targeted places

  13. WORK SCHEDULE

  14. THANK YOU

More Related