Soil geochemical survey of florida
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 32

Soil Geochemical Survey of Florida PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 107 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Soil Geochemical Survey of Florida. Ming Chen, PhD. Quality Assurance Officer University of Florida, IFAS Belle Glade, FL 33430. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. Univ. Florida - Soil & Water Dept. Lena Q. Ma Willie G. Harris Tait Chirenje Florida Cooperative Soil Survey

Download Presentation

Soil Geochemical Survey of Florida

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Soil geochemical survey of florida

Soil Geochemical Survey of Florida

Ming Chen, PhD

Quality Assurance Officer

University of Florida, IFAS

Belle Glade, FL 33430


Soil geochemical survey of florida

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

  • Univ. Florida - Soil & Water Dept.

    • Lena Q. Ma

    • Willie G. Harris

    • Tait Chirenje

  • Florida Cooperative Soil Survey

  • Florida Center for Solid & Hazardous Waste Management

  • Florida Power and Light

  • Florida DEP


Soil geochemical survey of florida

What We Did in Florida?

  • Background of 21 Elements in Soils.

    • Determination (total vs. total-recoverable)

    • Interpretation (baseline vs. taxonomy)

  • Geochemical Survey of As in Urban Soils

    • Sampling protocol

    • Golf course study

  • Soil Digestion - Method Development

    • USEPA vs. Europe

    • Hotplate vs. Microwave


Soil geochemical survey of florida

SOIL BACKGROUND

STUDY


Soil geochemical survey of florida

Pristine

Agricultural

Urban

What is Background ?

  • Natural Background (NB)

    • Concentrations of chemicals in soils without human influence(USEPA, 1995)

  • AnthropogenicBackground (AB)

    • AB= NB + Anthropogenic input from non-point sources


Soil geochemical survey of florida

Sample Size Consideration

  • NB-variability & soil taxonomy:

    N = [(S x t0.05)/R]2

  • AB - sample distribution & land use:

    To obtain 95th quantile at =0.05


Soil geochemical survey of florida

Ways to Interpret

  • Geometric Mean vs. Arithmetic Mean

    • Pattern of Distribution

  • Upper Percentile Level (UPL)

    • UBL-97.5% Upper Percentile of data (USGS, 1993)

    • UBL = GM  GSD2

    • Large database

  • Upper Confidence Level of Mean(UCL)

    • Site specific cases

    • Small database


Soil geochemical survey of florida

No. of Occurrences

Upper confidence limit (UCL)

When sample size is big enough, …

Upper baseline limit (UBL)

AM

GM / GSD2

GM X GSD2

Baseline (95%)

UCL vs. UBL

GM


Sample selection

Sample Selection

  • Near Pristine Soils - N = 448 out of 7000 Soil Survey Archives

    • Undisturbed Soil (n =266) - with native vegetation

    • Disturbed Soil (n=182) - by plowing or clearing

  • Representative of Samples

    • 7 orders - 19 suborders - 33 Great Groups

    • 51 counties - 80% acreage

  • Verification Samples


Geographical vs taxonomic

Geographical vs. Taxonomic


Quality assurance system

Quality Assurance System

  • QA Plan: Florida DEP approval

    • NELAP Certification

  • Digestion Method:

    • EPA 3051a – HNO3/HCl

    • EPA 3052 – HNO3/HCl/HF

  • QA/QC sample: every 20 samples

    • regent blank ------- MDLs

    • certified standard soil --- method validation

    • spiked soil ---- precision

    • duplicate soil ----- accuracy


Statistical consideration

Statistical Consideration

  • Test Sample Distribution for Normality:

    • Normally distributed datasets: t- UCL

    • Log-normally distributed datasets: H - UCL

    • Neither normally nor log-normally distributed datasets: Non-parametric tests (Pro- UCL)

  • Reduce Number of Non-detects

    • Updated procedure or instrument to low MDL.

    • Use 0.5 MDL for non-detects (< 20 %)

  • Outliers: Q-Q Plot


Soil geochemical survey of florida

As Distribution Pattern


Soil geochemical survey of florida

Is It a Real Soil Background- Q/Q Plot ?

Undisturbed Soils (n=266)

Disturbed Soils (n=182)

Urban Soils (n=197)


As values in florida world soils

As Values in Florida & World Soils


Soil geochemical survey of florida

Wet soils (73)

GM=1.28

Upland soils (293)

GM=0.18

Borderline(82)

GM=0.29

As vs. Soil Suborders


Factors contribute to as

Total Fe & Al

PCA : explained 29% of variation (Chen et al., 1999)

Partial regression <0.05 (Chen et al., 2002)

Phosphate Deposit

Total P: partial regression <0.05 (Chen et al., 2002)

Distribution paralleled

P rock: 7-121 vs. non- P rock: 2- 6.6 mg As /kg

Wetland/vegetation – no direct evidence

Factors Contribute to As


Factors contribute to as1

Limestone

3-13 mg/kg: Everglades (Chen et al., 2000)

40 mg/kg: Avon Park limestone (Levy County)

Sea snail and other marine animals

Database: 61.2- snail, 38.1-mollusk shells.

144-484 mg/kg – marine snail shells (vs. 0.2 for land snail)

3.6-63 mg/kg - meat, wet weight

Factors Contribute to As


Soil geochemical survey of florida

GEOCHEMICAL

SURVEY OF

AS IN URBAN SOIL


Soil geochemical survey of florida

Why Arsenic?

  • Toxicity

    • No. 1 priority hazardous substance (275) (ATSDR, 1999)

    • Class A human carcinogen (USEPA, 1998)

      • Taiwan

      • Bangladesh

      • Florida

  • Drinking Water Standard

    • USEPA 10 ppb (2006)


Soil geochemical survey of florida

Survey: As - Herbicide Usage on Golf Courses - (Chen & Ma, 2000)


Soil geochemical survey of florida

Lysimeter Study: As Held by Surface Soil (Chen & Snyder, 2002)


Soil geochemical survey of florida

Daytona Beach/ Volusia

Gainesville/Alachua

Ft.Lauderdale/ Broward

Miami/Dade

As in Urban Soils


Soil geochemical survey of florida

Sample Selection


Soil geochemical survey of florida

As in Urban Soils with Different Land Uses

Gainesville, FL (N=201)


Soil geochemical survey of florida

METHOD DEVELOPMENT

Soil Digestion Procedures


Why methods development

Why Methods Development ?

  • Worldwide Geo-chemical Survey needs Unified Methodology and Standards

    • Standard Operation Procedure (SOPs): data comparison

    • Certified Reference Materials (SRM): Data validation.

  • Digestion Methods are lab-dependent

    • Europe: Aqua regia (HNO3/HCl =1:3) + HF

    • USEPA Methods (3050, 3051, 3051a and 3052) (HNO3/HCl =3:1)

  • Microwave vs. Hotplate


Usepa digestion procedures

USEPA Digestion Procedures

  • EPA 3051a is an overall better procedure in replacing the regulatory method 3050.

  • 3051a and 3050 only get partial recoveries for Ba, Cr, Mo, Ni, K, and Al in NIST SRMs.


Soil geochemical survey of florida

USEPA vs. Aqua Regia Methods

  • Aqua regia procedures are more aggressive than the relevant EPA procedures.


Soil geochemical survey of florida

CONCLUSION

  • Florida soils generally have low elemental backgrounds, which are based on:

    • soil type

    • soil property

    • land uses

  • Certain soil has naturally high As background:

    • marl soil (wet)

    • muck soil (wet)

    • P deposit soil

    • Fe coated soil

    • marine shelly soil

    • contaminated soils


Soil geochemical survey of florida

CONCLUSION

  • UBL value of soil Suborder is a better approach for soil As screening in a state level. However,

    • there is not a single magic number for regulatory uses.

  • Pilot study and method development can address issues like:

    • soil sampling protocol

    • soil digestion procedure

    • certified standard soils


Soil geochemical survey of florida

MING CHEN

561-993-1527 [email protected]

THANK YOU


  • Login