1 / 34

Emil Voiculescu Technical University of Cluj, RO

Improving the beam quality by concurrently modifying the index and the doping profile in LMA fibers. Emil Voiculescu Technical University of Cluj, RO. Introduction.

bert-harris
Download Presentation

Emil Voiculescu Technical University of Cluj, RO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Improving the beam quality by concurrently modifying the index and the doping profile in LMA fibers Emil Voiculescu Technical University of Cluj, RO

  2. Introduction • We carried out a comprehensive study on the influence of the index profile over the distribution of the optical power among various modes.A systematical approach consisted in exploring most of the possible graded-index profiles, to facilitate the fundamental mode by concurrently rejecting the higher modes, to generate a so-called ‘quality beam’. • Most common doping profiles have been considered first, then various other kind of doping have been tested, in order to optimize the beam shape, i.e. to increasing the higher-order mode attenuation. • The LAD 3.2 has been used, and we are grateful to our colleague Dr Mircea Hotoleanu, principal writer of the software, and Mr Ettiene Friedrich for having helped in getting promptly the license from Liekki.

  3. n – the refractive index Δ = NA2/2n12 n2= nSiO2 = 1.4573 – index of pure silica n1 = √NA2+n22= 1.45898 n1 – n2− profile height Δ = ( n1 – n2 ) / n1 ≤ 1 % NA = √n12 – n22 Graded index profile: standard notation of principal quantities

  4. Large core fiber (40 μm diameter) Example of index profile for single mode operation To reject higher-order modes one needs a depression in the index characteristic around 9μm of radius and below one third of the index height n1 – n2.

  5. To reach maximum level, 6.5m of length will do Output optical power as a function of the fiber length Second mode M2 drastically attenuated by the depressed index profile used

  6. Doping profile used with the previous simulation : parabolic, most common Doping characteristic as given by the fiber manufacturer (implicitly set by the simulator)

  7. Large core (40 μm diameter) ytterbium-doped fiber Larger gain, tentatively modified doping profile to assist in higher-order modes rejection

  8. Doping profiles used

  9. Doping profiles used To obtain almost total suppression of higher-order modes as in the power plot,we still need to maintain the depression in the index profile

  10. Another common doping profile : linear (triangular), same 40 μm core diameter

  11. Gain characteristic slightly lower, single mode operation maintained

  12. Facts • as narrowing the core diameter is out of question (which, however, is the only way to go from multimode to the single mode operation with lower power), then • a pseudo-, or virtual-narrowing is necessary. This consists in creating a depression in the index profile around the middle of the core-radius, i.e. narrowing the high-index region as much as the single-mode operation requires.

  13. Is that so? Yes, it is. If we indulge in placing the index depression point farther from the fiber axis, or/and the index depression is less deeper, several higher-order modes might appear. Assume a step in the core-index profile, with a corner at 9 μm and a variation of 10-3 of the index :

  14. This time a parabolic doping profile – the one set by the manufacturer has been used. A step in the core-index profile, with a corner at 9 μm and a variation of 10-3 of the index Second and third mode are more powerful than the fundamental mode, which is unacceptable

  15. Improving the behavior However, one might improve that behavior by changing the doping profile as in the following diagram : As the index step is 9 μm far from the fiber axis, the step in the doping profile has been intentionally set closer to the axis : 5 μm. This counts as a thinner-core fiber.

  16. Simulation results All modes attenuated beginning with 6.7 dB for M2. Obviously, optimization required.

  17. Dopant concentration Facts • If virtual thinner-core fibers are to be emulated, then the worst-case happens for the thickest core : 40 μm for Liekki LMA fibers; • If one try to bypass the step in the doping profile, or to push it farther from the fiber axis, or to move outside the steps in both characte-ristics – index and dopant profiles, then the limits are clear. The following example is explicit. First Let’s take a graded doping profile, a linear one :

  18. Refraction index Facts Then, a step depression in the core-index at the usual 9 μm distance from the axis...

  19. What happens? Modes M3 and M2 are comparable with the useful M1 mode.

  20. Conclusion • One has to make a trade-off among both profile distortions; technological constraints apply. • It seems that the depression in the index profile has to be in all circumstances close to a / 2, a being the core radius. • The doping profile has to be modulated mostly the same way, however it is less effective in distributing the power among modes, it rather influences the total amount of generated power.

  21. Is this behavior the same in thinner-core fibers ? Yes, it is. Let’s take the following example : a 30 μm-thick core Ytterbium-doped fiber provided with a linear graded index (depression point at 9 μm from the axis, easier to be bypassed ).

  22. Is this behavior the same in thinner-core fibers ? We want to attenuate higher-order modes, so we deliberately introduce a step depression in the doping profile :

  23. Simulation results An attenuation of 8.5 dB of mode M2 follows, which might be further improved.

  24. Simulation results It is even better for 20 μm core fibers. Take this graded-index fiber :

  25. Simulation results And let us use the implicit parabolic doping :

  26. Simulation results This pure single-mode operation results:

  27. Simulation results If we try to ignore the depression point in the index profile, for instance by choosing a parabolic graded index in the core (very common) :

  28. Simulation results Then, even if we modify the doping profile to assist with higher order modes rejection / attenuation :

  29. Simulation results We might get issues !

  30. Conclusions Anyway, 1. Mode M2 is over 6 time attenuated, and it could be attenuated more severely if the refraction index profile would be made up to fulfill the beam-aspect requirement. 2. It is a lot more easier to solve the single mode operation for the thinner-core fiber ( YDF DC 20 /400) than for the 30μm-core fiber and 40 μm-core fiber.

  31. Conclusions Allowed area to place the index characteristic in (the gray region) for single-mode operation - applies for 20μm-thick core LMA fibers. Point D defines by its coordinates [r,n] the necessary depression in the index profile : D [ 5μm; 1,4582]

  32. Conclusions Depression point position obtained for the 30μm-thick core LMA fibers to get sufficient attenuation of the higher order modes The index profile has to fit in the shaded area

  33. Conclusions Allowed area to place the index characteristic in (the gray region) for single-mode operation - applies for 40μm-thick core LMA fibers. The index profile has to fit in the shaded area

  34. Final thoughts and perspective work • Main concern: as operation is forcibly moved to the single-mode, the virtual narrowing of the physical core raises the problem of the energy distribution in the core, i.e. the energy density. This has to be studied next.• Another obvious perspective will consist in verifying the assertions made in this paper by practical experimenting. One has to find to what extent the results we got can be implemented in the manufacturing process. And what would be the actual outcome.

More Related