1 / 16

Atam Rao SH-NPTDS and INPRO Technical Coordinator

Clarification discussion on topics and guidelines for the implementation of collaborative projects in INPRO Phase 2: general rule to built CPP consensus, expected outcome of this meeting and criteria to recommend CPPs to SCM. Atam Rao SH-NPTDS and INPRO Technical Coordinator.

barid
Download Presentation

Atam Rao SH-NPTDS and INPRO Technical Coordinator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Clarification discussion on topics and guidelines for the implementation of collaborative projects in INPRO Phase 2:general rule to built CPP consensus, expected outcome of this meeting and criteria to recommend CPPs to SCM Atam Rao SH-NPTDS and INPRO Technical Coordinator CONSULTANCY MEETING ”TO REVIEW THE COLLABORATIVE PROJECT PROPOSALS (CPPs) FOR INPRO PHASE 2” 21-25 May, 2007 IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria

  2. Received CPPs (1) ARM1: Investigation of method for treatment of spent nuclear fuel and radwaste in a country with small territory ARM2: Safety operation of nuclear unit(s) to comply with different regimes of the small power grid CAN1: Development of scenarios for actinide burning thermal reactors as part of a sustainable nuclear fuel cycle CZE1: Meeting of energy needs in the period of raw materials insufficiency during the 21st century FRA1: Reliability Assessment of Passive Gaseous Provisions (RGAP) 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  3. Received CPPs (2) FRA2: Environmental impact benchmarking relative to an INS FRA3: Proliferation Resistance analysis and methodology improvements for multinational INSs IND1: Investigation of safety issues for advanced high temperature reactors and their combined operation with hydrogen producing plants IND2: Investigation of technological challenges related to advanced high temperature reactors IND3: Collaborative research related to advanced water cooled reactors 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  4. Received CPPs (3) IND4: Study on probable development of nuclear energy systems in different regions and time frames and for different application areas including non-electric applications IND5: Integrated approach for the design of safety grade decay heat removal system for Liquid Metal Reactor (LMR) ROK1: Acquisition/diversion pathway analysis for the assessment of proliferation resistance including misuse and possible concealment strategies 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  5. Received CPPs (4) • RUS1: Development of a Global Architecture for Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems with thermal and fast reactors based on closed fuel cycle (GAINS) • RUS4:Floating NPPs with SMRs for various applications in developing countries 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  6. Nature of CPPs 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  7. Administrative Guidelines for Implementation of Collaborative Projects at Phase 2 INPRO. 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  8. CPPs Grouping By Technical Areas 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  9. Proposed options of implementation in CPPs 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  10. Recommended discussion flow INPRO reports summary of initial consideration on compliance with Framework document and characteristics of implementation options (TCP,CRP, JI) A presentation to explain (a) proposal(s) by a proponent + clarification questions A presentation to explain (a) proposal(s) by a proponent + clarification questions A presentation to explain (a) proposal(s) by a proponent + clarification questions A presentation to explain (a) proposal(s) by a proponent + clarification questions A presentation to explain (a) proposal(s) by a proponent + clarification questions A presentation to explain (a) proposal(s) by a proponent + clarification questions A presentation to explain (a) proposal(s) by a proponent + clarification questions • For each proposal, SC will • indicate interested partners • endorse the proposal • identify implementation option (CRP, TCP, JI) and resource commitment Set next action (e.g. technical meetings to discuss further detail) 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  11. Summary of initial consideration on compliance with Framework document *: one GIF member identifies its concern 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  12. Summary of implementation options 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  13. Proposed format for discussion **NS: not specified *Endorsement to go next step 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  14. 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  15. Clarification: Implementation options • Technical cooperation (TCP) • New projects start in 2009 • Some limited possibility of inter-regional option earlier • Coordinated Research Project (CRP) • Using existing mechanisms of IAEA, best for long term proposals – beyond 2009 • Some limited items can be included in 2008/09 plans • Joint Initiative (JI) • More flexible but requires new procedures e.g. the response to the 50th General Conference resolutions • Additional resources needed for coordination when large number of projects are started 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

  16. Summary • Promising options for future collaborative projects have been identified • Addressing member needs more directly • Addressing specific tasks allows more flexibility for participation in extra budgetary programs • Members encouraged to consider active participation • Need to agree to specific future actions/dates • Probably incorporate follow up actions from joint study on “fast reactors and closed fuel cycle” 10th SC, 7-8 December 2006

More Related