Why does succession take so long
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 48

Why does succession take so long? PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 122 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Why does succession take so long?. Different plant species have different ecological requirements. A beech or live-oak needs shade as a seedling. They also need soil moisture which means the soil must have a high organic content.

Download Presentation

Why does succession take so long?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Why does succession take so long

Why does succession take so long?

  • Different plant species have different ecological requirements. A beech or live-oak needs shade as a seedling.

  • They also need soil moisture which means the soil must have a high organic content.

  • So succession is also the development of soil and colonization by soil organisms.


3 models of succession connell and slatyer 1979

3 models of successionConnell and Slatyer (1979)


Facilitation

Facilitation

  • Initially thought that all succession was due to facilitation.

    Example of facilitation: shade provided by pines allows seedlings of broad-leaved trees to survive.

    Or

    Growth of a nitrogen-fixing plant on sandy (nutrient poor) soils such as alder enriches the soil sufficiently for other species to colonize.


Tolerance

Tolerance

  • All species could live at all stages of the succession, but differing dispersal abilities/adaptations ensures earliest stages occupied by pioneer-type species.

  • As succession proceeds fewer and fewer of the early successional species can tolerate the new conditions and so the system matures toward D.

  • Dispersal distance is therefore also a big factor to be considered.


Inhibition

Inhibition

  • Species mutually inhibit one another through competition. System can only change when an individual dies an is replaced.

  • What will influence that replacement?


Soil maturity and succession

Soil maturity and succession

  • Soil accumulates organic matter as succession proceeds.

  • Increased ability to hold moisture.

  • Pioneer species are shaded out.


The balance

The balance

  • Now understood that facilitation, tolerance, and inhibition all combine to produce succession.


Clements vs gleason

Clements vs Gleason

  • We now know that species respond individualistically to change.

  • Communities are not superorganisms and will not always return to a predictable equilibrium.


Colonization of new areas

Primary Succession: Colonization of new areas

Colonization of new areas


Colonization of a new area

Colonization of a new area

  • Follows succession from pioneers to competitors…..but all have to disperse there.

  • Distance from source is important…can larvae survive long enough to be transported there? Can seeds be blown there? Can mammals swim there? Can birds fly there?


Two ways to study succession

Two ways to study succession

  • Follow one location from disturbance to maturity, ex. Krakatau, Mt St Helens.

  • Select similar habitats at different times since similar disturbance, ex. Glacier Bay, building riverbank


Intertidal succession

Intertidal succession

  • Macroalgal succession over 30 months on experimental concrete blocks.

Ulva

Sea lettuce


Primary succession in glacier bay alaska

Primary succession in Glacier Bay, Alaska

  • Steadily retreating glacier since 1850s.

  • New land surface revealed…primary succession.

  • Oldest succession where ice first retreated.

1912

1850


Glacier bay succession

Glacier Bay Succession

  • Retreating glaciers expose new land surface of till.

  • Rate of retreat ca. 65 km in 200 years

  • Succession follows broadly predictable path


Nutrient changes at glacier bay

Nutrient changes at Glacier Bay

  • The initial soil is nutrient poor.

  • Alder is an N-fixer, spruce and hemlock are not.

  • “forest floor” reflects N in leaf and wood litter.

  • Why is there a peak in forest floor N at the transition to spruce-hemlock.

  • Why does soil N decline in the spruce-hemlock zone?


At least that has been the accepted story but

AT least that has been the accepted story..BUT!

  • Fastie (1995, Ecology) shows that alder may actually slow the succession through competition.

  • The succession to Sitka Spruce was much faster in the sites deglaciated in the 1780s-1840s than the later sites.

  • And hemlock has not begun to grow at any site that initiated after 1840.


Simulation showing nitrogen inputs during 2ndry succession

Simulation showing nitrogen inputs during 2ndry succession

Importance of alder (ALRU) as a nitrogen fixer and Ceanothus (CEVE), early in succession.


Nitrogen sources

Nitrogen sources


Why does succession take so long

Rotmoos Glacier, Italian alps 1895


Why does succession take so long

Rotmoos Glacier, Italian alps 1999


Rotmoos glacier italian alps

Rotmoos Glacier, Italian alps

  • 1895 glacial tongue evident in valley

  • 1999 2km of retreat evident

  • Following is work by Kauffman, Ecology (2001)


First 50 yrs

5 yrs: Harvestman-

a glacial specialist

Predator.

10 yrs: 4 spp. Of ground beetle, occupying separate niches.

20 yrs: assorted spiders

Abundant.

30 yr Centipedes, under rocks

50 yrs: herbivorous beetles as vegetation density increases.

First 50 yrs

  • Sparse vegetation means little local productivity.

  • Surprisingly, insects are primarily predators relying on allochthonous (derived from elsewhere) sources of prey


50 150 yrs first appearances

50-150 yrs first appearances

70 yr: millipedes

are important

decomposers.

100 yrs: 1 sp.

Of ant occupies

sunniest locations

140 yrs: Densest

Vegetation

supports

grasshoppers

  • As vegetation increases in density a more normal insect spectrum is represented with food chains supported by herbivores. Detrital cycle also evident. System now autochthonous (productivity is local).


Effect of succession on adjacent waters

Effect of succession on adjacent waters

  • Shading of margins

  • As succession increases soil organic content will also increase dissolved organic carbon (DOC), e.g. humic acids and tannins.

  • Leaching into waterways these chemicals color the water and reduce transparency.


Dissolved organic carbon e g humic acids influences aquatic foodchains

Dissolved Organic Carbon, e.g humic acids influences aquatic foodchains

Macro

Zooplankton

Spp.#

2

3-4

5

DOC

Low

Moderate

High


Mt st helens example of interference

Mt St. Helens example of interference

  • Lupins are N fixers and were colonists after the Mt St. Helens eruption.

  • Lupin expansion rapid at first but slowed after a few years.

Fagan & Bishop

(American Naturalist 2000)


Interactive effects of herbivory and predation

Interactive effects of herbivory and predation

  • At expansion edge Lupin expansion limited by herbivory.

  • In center of lupin range herbivory limited by predation.


This river is building a spit

This river is building a spit

  • As the spit grows the youngest vegetation will be on the tip.

  • Often a clear succession, both in terms of age and species composition, is evident.


Succession in streams rivers

Succession in streams &rivers

  • Note the change in size and species composition beside the channel


Can we make predictions about the colonization process

Can we make predictions about the colonization process?

  • Here is an island.

  • Most plants are going to arrive either by wind, sea, or bird/bat.


Krakatau case study

Krakatau case study

  • Krakatau is an island group in Indonesia.

  • A volcanic eruption sterilized the islands in 1883.


Krakatau the best example of primary succession

Krakatau: The best example of primary succession

  • Aug 27th 1883 Volcanic explosion sterilized islands

  • 2000 times the power of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

  • Generated tsunami that killed 36,000 people

  • 100 m thickness of new ash coated the islands…new land surface. A natural laboratory.

  • Colonization of plants and animals documented since 1884.

Krakatau is west

of Java


Immediately after the eruption

Immediately after the eruption

  • 1884: no plant life found, some blue-green algae growing on ash.

  • 1896: there were some coastal shrubs, scattered grasses and shrubs in the interior.

  • 1908: Interior a “parkland” of grasses and clumps of trees.


The succession continues

The succession continues

  • 1928-1932: forests close over the grassland.

  • 1979-1992: forests changing in species composition. Earliest trees now 60-80 years old.


Increase in species diversity

Increase in species diversity

  • Plant species continue to colonize the islands.

  • New plants provide new opportunities for animals.

  • Animals cannot colonize until foodplant is present.


Pattern evident in dispersal mechanism of arrivals

Pattern evident in dispersal mechanism of arrivals

  • At first wind and sea dispersed species.

  • Later trees dominated by bird and bat dispersed species.

  • Wind dispersal still brings orchids and ferns.


Large pigeons and bats regularly move between islands and mainland

Large pigeons and bats regularly move between islands and mainland


Development of structure

Development of structure

  • As succession proceeds the physical structure of the vegetation becomes more complex, offering more niches. Trunk-cavities, vines, larger limbs.

  • How would this affect recruitment?


Why structure matters

Why structure matters

  • The more layers in the canopy the higher the animal diversity.Offer different feeding opportunities.

  • Trunk-cavities provide nest sites for birds and insects.

  • Vines provide food, cover and nest sites.

  • Dead wood for decomposers

  • Larger limbs better attachment sites for epiphytes.


Biotic and abiotic influences

Biotic and abiotic influences

  • Nitrogen likely to be limiting nutrient early in succession….why?


Source of recovery will be different in primary and secondary succession

Source of recovery will be different in primary and secondary succession


How habitat quality influences succession

How habitat quality influences succession

  • Walker and Chapin’s model considers the importance of major ecological factors in succession in terms of severe and favorable landscapes.


Walker and chapin cont

Walker and Chapin Cont.

  • Note how differently facilitation and competition influence succession.


  • Login