1 / 9

Paper 1: SBQ

Paper 1: SBQ. Structure. 1 hour 3-4 sources Sources may be of different types (written, visual, etc.) Max of 600 words (or equivalent) Part A = compare and contrast two sources regarding their attitude towards a particular issue

Download Presentation

Paper 1: SBQ

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Paper 1: SBQ

  2. Structure • 1 hour • 3-4 sources • Sources may be of different types (written, visual, etc.) • Max of 600 words (or equivalent) • Part A = compare and contrast two sources regarding their attitude towards a particular issue • Part B = using the sources + contextual knowledge to develop a reasoned, balanced and explicit argument

  3. Part A • Identify compare/contrast elements in your first paragraph • Go beyond ‘face value’ in your second paragraph: - Using contextual knowledge - Motives behind the speech, correspondence, visual, etc. - Use of emotive language

  4. Part B • Skills required: • Contextual knowledge • Comprehension of source content • Cross-referencing • Understanding of provenance • Weighing evidence • Reaching a reasoned judgment • Developing a focused and balanced argument

  5. What Examiners Are Looking For • Refer to Generic Mark Schemes • Part A (15 points): • 3 = contextual knowledge/awareness • 4 = source evaluation • 8 = develop comparison/grasp of sources • Part B (25 points): • 8 = analysis – quality of answer • 6 = grasp of sources (grouping) – use of sources • 6 = source evaluation • 5 = contextual knowledge

  6. Key Features of a Good Response • Focus - stay focused on the question throughout your response • Balance – shows understanding of both sides • Explicit – the argument is clear • Supported – the argument is supported by accurate and appropriate factual evidence • Consistency – the argument is consistent throughout • Style – the argument is easy to follow • Analysis – must explain the connection between the evidence presented and the question

  7. Extras • No five-paragraph essay – get to the point right away! • Work on pacing – 5-7 minutes to go through all the sources • Use all sources to construct your answer to Part B – make your judgment clear • Look for potential bias when evaluating sources • Paraphrase your sources • Don’t forget to attribute your sources – i.e., “As stated in Source A…, (Source B)…”

  8. Common Weaknesses • Over-reliance on basic comprehension of source contents • Face-value interpretation only (believing every word) • Absence of contextual knowledge • Lack of effective cross-referencing between sources • Assumptions about bias • Unsupported assertions • Lack of focus on the specific question, lack of balance or disjointed • Narrative approach • Dealing with both sides without reaching a conclusion

  9. Paragraph Structure • First paragraph (opening) - define key term(s) in question - identify choice of argument or answer - balance is evident - give a few reasons for your answer (road map) • Paragraph 2 - develop the case and bring in supportive details • Paragraph 3 - the counterargument - conclusion

More Related