1 / 21

Surface Roughness Impedance in the LCLS Undulator Beam Pipe Gennady Stupakov, SLAC April 24, 2002

Surface Roughness Impedance in the LCLS Undulator Beam Pipe Gennady Stupakov, SLAC April 24, 2002. Introduction Small-angle approximation Surface roughness measurements and estimate of the impedance Case σ z > bump size Synchronous mode in a pipe with rough surfaces Conclusions.

Download Presentation

Surface Roughness Impedance in the LCLS Undulator Beam Pipe Gennady Stupakov, SLAC April 24, 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Surface Roughness Impedance inthe LCLS Undulator Beam PipeGennady Stupakov, SLACApril 24, 2002 • Introduction • Small-angle approximation • Surface roughness measurements and estimate of the impedance • Case σz>bump size • Synchronous mode in a pipe with rough surfaces • Conclusions G. Stupakov, SLAC

  2. Introduction • Design of the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) requires short bunches (rms length 25-30 μm) and small energy spread in the beam (<0.1%). • It was initially estimated that the longitudinal impedance due to wall roughness in the undulator may be the dominant source of impedance in the LCLS. A small bunch length and close proximity of the wall in the undulator increase the effect of roughness impedance which is usually negligible in accelerators. • During last 5 years several theories of the roughness impedance have been developed which treat different aspects of the beam – rough-wall interaction. The theories are often complicated and sometimes seemingly contradict to each other. However, in my opinion, they are mostly consistent, but may differ in assumptions of roughness properties. G. Stupakov, SLAC

  3. Resistive wall wakefields, for a Gaussian axial distribution. Given are the average energy loss,<d>, the rms energy spread, sd, and the relative correlated emittance growth, De /e0, of a 100 μm betatron oscillation (from LCLS Design Study Report) G. Stupakov, SLAC

  4. G. Stupakov, SLAC

  5. G. Stupakov, SLAC

  6. Small-Angle Approximation,szBump Size In this limit the impedance is inductive. Inductance per unit length of the pipe G. Stupakov, SLAC

  7. Undulator Pipe Surface Roughness Measurements Surface profile was measured for an undulator pipe using Atomic Force Microscope at NIST, Boulder, Colorado (Stupakov, Thomson, Carr & Walz, 1999) A high quality Type 316-L stainless steel tubing from the VALEX Corporation with an outer diameter of 6.35 mm and a wall thickness of 0.89 mm was used. The pipe had the best commercial finish corresponding to Ra= 125 nm. G. Stupakov, SLAC

  8. G. Stupakov, SLAC

  9. G. Stupakov, SLAC

  10. G. Stupakov, SLAC

  11. Product Lb for Large Samples. G. Stupakov, SLAC

  12. Case sz < g The theory has been developed only for a wall with a sinusoidal corrugation There are synchronous modes in a corrugated waveguide with the wavelength λ > 2/κ. Excitation of those modes results in a resistive part of the impedance. The wake where G. Stupakov, SLAC

  13. Gaussian bunch with RMS length σz Roughness wake for a Gaussian bunch G. Stupakov, SLAC

  14. Gaussian bunch with RMS length σz G. Stupakov, SLAC

  15. Rectangular Bunch Profile A rectangular axial profile gives a better approximation for the LCLS bunch. LCLS nominal parameters: N = 6 ·109, h = 0.28 μm (corresponding to the RMS roughness of 0.2 μm), g = 2π/κ = 100 μm, L = 100 m, E = 15 GeV, b = 2.5 mm. The averages energy loss is 2 · 10-3%. The RMS energy spread is 10-4%. G. Stupakov, SLAC

  16. Synchronous Mode A low-frequency synchronous mode, λ >> g, with vph = c can propagate in a pipe with rough surfaces, (A. Novokhatski & A. Mosnier, 1997). This theory cannot be derived in the perturbation approach. Interacting with the beam, this mode produces an impedance that is not purely inductive any more. Novokhatsky et al., 1998 G. Stupakov, SLAC

  17. Theory of Synchronous Mode K. Bane & A. Novokhatski (1999) modeled roughness as axisymmetric steps on the surface, assuming that d, g, p << b The mode wavelength is hence ω0∼ 1/√δ. Wakefunction and the loss factor K (per unit length) Surprisingly, K does not depend on the roughness properties. G. Stupakov, SLAC

  18. Theory of Synchronous Mode Effect of 50 nm roughness (from SLAC-AP-117) BN estimate the tolerance δ < 10 –20 nm. This model does not take into account the large “aspect ratio” of roughness. Experimental observation of synchronous mode wake.elds: M. Huning et al., PRL, 88, 074802 (2002); also at BNL. G. Stupakov, SLAC

  19. Synchronous Mode in a Pipe with Corrugated Walls The mode frequency ω0 depends on κ and h. Longitudinal wake (Stupakov, 1999) G. Stupakov, SLAC

  20. Synchronous Mode in a Pipe with Corrugated Walls Typical parameters for roughness: h = 0.5 μm, b = 2 mm, κ = 2π / 50 μm-1. Corresponding loss-factor parameter f 2·10-3 G. Stupakov, SLAC

  21. Conclusions • After more than 5 years of theoretical research, we have a good understanding and a theoretical picture of the wake generated by a rough surface in the undulator. • Theoretical predictions strongly depend on the ”aspect ratio” g/h of roughness. Typically this is a large number. Measured by AFM for a SS pipe with a best finish g/h ∼ 102– 103. • The predictions for the current design of the LCLS undulator based on the measured roughness profile (RMS height h∼ 100 nm, g∼ 20 – 100 μm) show that the roughness impedance is smaller than the resistive impedance of the copper wall. Further surface measurements and/or wakefield experiments are desirable to validate this conclusion. G. Stupakov, SLAC

More Related