1 / 6

The Quality of Environmental Impact Statements of Waste Incineration Projects in Finland

The Quality of Environmental Impact Statements of Waste Incineration Projects in Finland. IAIA’07 Seoul, Korea, 5th June 2007 Kimmo Jalava Environmental Science University of Jyväskylä. Background of the study. Multidisciplinary research project: Effectiveness of EIA

anjolie-black
Download Presentation

The Quality of Environmental Impact Statements of Waste Incineration Projects in Finland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Quality of Environmental Impact Statements of Waste Incineration Projects in Finland IAIA’07 Seoul, Korea, 5th June 2007 Kimmo Jalava Environmental Science University of Jyväskylä

  2. Background of the study • Multidisciplinary research project: Effectiveness of EIA • Law, politics and environment • Funded by Academy of Finland • Quality as a part of efectiveness • European Commission’s Guidance on EIA: EIS review europa.eu.int/comm/environment/pubs/home.htm

  3. Method • EC’s EIS review: general instructions + 143 questions • 15 environmental impact statements of waste incineration projects • 2 reviewers • Two-step review: first independently then combined

  4. Results • Generally the EISs were satisfactory or good • The review areas by the result from the best to the worst: • Description of the environment • Presentational issues • Description of the environmental impacts • Description of the project • Mitigation measures and follow up • Non-technical summary

  5. Experiences from the study • EC’s review questions brought systemacy to the review and the reviewers gained seemingly similar review results • The need for technical expertise cannot be overlooked • The importance of presentational issues cannot be overrated

  6. Thank you!

More Related