1 / 17

Electromagnetic waves: Interference

Electromagnetic waves: Interference. Wednesday November 6, 2002. Haidinger’s Bands: Fringes of equal inclination. d. n 1. n 2. Beam splitter. P.  1. x. .  1. f. Extended source. Focal plane. Dielectric slab. P I. P 2. Fizeau Fringes: fringes of equal thickness.

anila
Download Presentation

Electromagnetic waves: Interference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electromagnetic waves: Interference Wednesday November 6, 2002

  2. Haidinger’s Bands: Fringes of equal inclination d n1 n2 Beam splitter P 1 x  1 f Extended source Focal plane Dielectric slab PI P2

  3. Fizeau Fringes: fringes of equal thickness • Now imagine we arrange to keep cos ’ constant • We can do this if we keep ’ small • That is, view near normal incidence • Focus eye near plane of film • Fringes are localized near film since rays diverge from this region • Now this is still two beam interference, but whether we have a maximum or minimum will depend on the value of t

  4. Fizeau Fringes: fringes of equal thickness where, Then if film varies in thickness we will see fringes as we move our eye. These are termed Fizeau fringes.

  5. Fizeau Fringes Beam splitter n Extended source n2 n x

  6. Wedge between two plates 1 2 glass D y glass air L Path difference = 2y Phase difference  = 2ky -  (phase change for 2, but not for 1) Maxima 2y = (m + ½) o/n Minima 2y = mo/n

  7. Wedge between two plates Maxima 2y = (m + ½) o/n Minima 2y = mo/n D y air Look at p and p + 1 maxima yp+1 – yp = o/2n  Δx where Δx = distance between adjacent maxima Now if diameter of object = D Then L = D And (D/L) Δx= o/2n or D = oL/2n Δx L

  8. Wedge between two plates Can be used to test the quality of surfaces Fringes follow contour of constant y Thus a flat bottom plate will give straight fringes, otherwise ripples in the fringes will be seen.

  9. Newton’s rings Used to test spherical surfaces Beam splitter

  10. Newton’s rings Maxima when, y = (m+1/2) o/2n Gives rings, Rm2=(m+1/2)oR/n R- Rcos = y or, R2=(R-y)2+r2  R2(1-2y/R) + r2  i.e. r2 = 2yR R R y r

  11. Reflection from dielectric layer: Antireflection coatings • Important in instruments such as cameras where reflections can give rise to spurious images • Usually designed for particular wavelength in this region – i.e. where film or eye are most sensitive

  12. Anti-Reflection coatings 2 1 A. Determine thickness of film air n1 n2 film n1 < n2 < n3 n3 glass Thus both rays (1 and 2) are shifted in phase by  on reflection. For destructive interference (near normal incidence) 2n2t=(m+1/2) Determines the thickness of the film (usually use m=0 for minimum t)

  13. Anti-Reflection coatings 2 1 air B. Determine refractive index of film n1 A’ A Near normal incidence Amplitude at A n2 film n3 glass Since  ’ ~ 1

  14. Anti-reflection coating B. Determine refractive index of film Amplitude at A’ To get perfect cancellation, we would like EA = E A’ should be index of AR film

  15. Multiple Beam interference • Thus far in looking at reflectivity from a dielectric layer we have assumed that the reflectivity is small • The problem then reduces to two beam interference • Now consider a dielectric layer of uniform thickness d and assume that the reflectivity is large e.g. || > 0.8 • This is usually obtained by coating the surface of the layer with a thin metallic coating – or several dielectric coatings to give high reflectivity • Or, one can put coatings on glass plates , then consider space between plates

  16. Multiple beam interference Let 12 =  21= ’ 12=  21= ’ ’’ Eo (’)5’Eo Eo (’)3’Eo (’)7’Eo  n1 n2 ’ A B C D n1  (’)2’Eo (’)6’Eo ’ Eo (’)4’Eo

  17. Multiple Beam Interference • Assume a (for the time being) a monochromatic source • , ’ small ( < 30o) usually • Now || = |’| >> , ’ • Thus reflected beams decrease rapidly in amplitude (from first to second) • But amplitude of adjacent transmitted beam is about the same amplitude • Amplitude of successfully reflected beams decreases slowly (from the second) • Thus treat in transmission where contrast should be somewhat higher • The latter is the configuration of most applications

More Related