1 / 48

An Improved Liar Game Strategy From a Deterministic Random Walk Robert Ellis February 22 nd , 2010

An Improved Liar Game Strategy From a Deterministic Random Walk Robert Ellis February 22 nd , 2010 Peled Workshop, UIC Joint work with Joshua Cooper, University of South Carolina. 2. Outline. Diffusion processes on Z Simple random walk (linear machine) Liar machine

amma
Download Presentation

An Improved Liar Game Strategy From a Deterministic Random Walk Robert Ellis February 22 nd , 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Improved Liar Game Strategy From a Deterministic Random Walk Robert Ellis February 22nd, 2010 Peled Workshop, UIC Joint work with Joshua Cooper, University of South Carolina

  2. 2 Outline • Diffusion processes on Z • Simple random walk (linear machine) • Liar machine • Pathological liar game, alternating question strategy • Improved pathological liar game bound • Reduction to liar machine • Discrepancy analysis of liar machine versus linear machine • Concluding remarks

  3. -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 Linear Machine on Z 11

  4. -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Linear Machine on Z 5.5 5.5

  5. -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Linear Machine on Z 2.75 5.5 2.75 Time-evolution: 11 £ binomial distribution of {-1,+1} coin flips

  6. -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Liar Machine on Z Liar machine time-step Number chips left-to-right 1,2,3,… Move odd chips right, even chips left (Reassign numbers every time-step) t=0 11 chips • Approximates linear machine • Preserves indivisibility of chips

  7. -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Liar Machine on Z Liar machine time-step Number chips left-to-right 1,2,3,… Move odd chips right, even chips left (Reassign numbers every time-step) t=1

  8. -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Liar Machine on Z Liar machine time-step Number chips left-to-right 1,2,3,… Move odd chips right, even chips left (Reassign numbers every time-step) t=2

  9. -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Liar Machine on Z Liar machine time-step Number chips left-to-right 1,2,3,… Move odd chips right, even chips left (Reassign numbers every time-step) t=3

  10. -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Liar Machine on Z Liar machine time-step Number chips left-to-right 1,2,3,… Move odd chips right, even chips left (Reassign numbers every time-step) t=4

  11. -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Liar Machine on Z Liar machine time-step Number chips left-to-right 1,2,3,… Move odd chips right, even chips left (Reassign numbers every time-step) t=5

  12. -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Liar Machine on Z Liar machine time-step Number chips left-to-right 1,2,3,… Move odd chips right, even chips left (Reassign numbers every time-step) t=6

  13. -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Liar Machine on Z Liar machine time-step Number chips left-to-right 1,2,3,… Move odd chips right, even chips left (Reassign numbers every time-step) t=7 Height of linear machine at t=7 l1-distance: 5.80 l∞-distance: 0.98

  14. Discrepancy for Two Discretizations Liar machine: round-offs spatially balanced Rotor-router model/Propp machine: round-offs temporally balanced The liar machine has poorer discrepancy… but provides bounds to a certain liar game.

  15. Proof of Liar Machine Pointwise Discrepancy

  16. (6,1)-Liar Game Liar game time step Paul bipartitions chips: green, purple Carole moves one color to right Paul’s goal: disqualify all but ≤1 chip after t=6 time steps t=0 Carole moves purple Paul bipartitions 9 chips 0 1 2 disqualified

  17. (6,1)-Liar Game Liar game time step Paul bipartitions chips: green, purple Carole moves one color to right Paul’s goal: disqualify all but ≤1 chip after t=6 time steps t=1 Carole moves green 0 1 2 disqualified Paul bipartitions

  18. (6,1)-Liar Game Liar game time step Paul bipartitions chips: green, purple Carole moves one color to right Paul’s goal: disqualify all but ≤1 chip after t=6 time steps t=2 Paul bipartitions Carole moves green 0 1 2 disqualified

  19. (6,1)-Liar Game Liar game time step Paul bipartitions chips: green, purple Carole moves one color to right Paul’s goal: disqualify all but ≤1 chip after t=6 time steps t=3 Paul bipartitions Carole moves purple 0 1 2 disqualified

  20. (6,1)-Liar Game Liar game time step Paul bipartitions chips: green, purple Carole moves one color to right Paul’s goal: disqualify all but ≤1 chip after t=6 time steps t=4 Paul bipartitions Carole moves purple 0 1 2 disqualified

  21. (6,1)-Liar Game Liar game time step Paul bipartitions chips: green, purple Carole moves one color to right Paul’s goal: disqualify all but ≤1 chip after t=6 time steps t=5 Paul bipartitions Carole moves green 0 1 2 disqualified

  22. (6,1)-Liar Game Liar game time step Paul bipartitions chips: green, purple Carole moves one color to right Paul’s goal: disqualify all but ≤1 chip after t=6 time steps t=6 0 1 2 disqualified Two chips survive: Paul loses

  23. 23 A Liar Game Strategy for Carole • Weight function for n rounds left; xi = #chips with i lies: • Lemma (Berlekamp) • Refined sphere boundLiar game. Carole keeps half of weight every step.Initial weight > 2n) Final weight >1 ) Carole wins.Pathological variant. Carole reduces half of weight every step.Initial weight < 2n) Final weight <1 ) Carole wins.

  24. (6,1)-Pathological Liar Game Paul’s goal: preserve¸ 1 chip after t=6 time steps wt6-t(x)=wt6(x)=26-1 t=0 Carole moves green Paul bipartitions 9 chips 0 1 2 disqualified

  25. (6,1)-Pathological Liar Game Paul’s goal: preserve¸ 1 chip after t=6 time steps wt5(x)=25-3 t=1 Paul bipartitions Carole moves green 0 1 2 disqualified

  26. (6,1)-Pathological Liar Game Paul’s goal: preserve¸ 1 chip after t=6 time steps wt4(x)=24-2 t=2 Paul bipartitions Carole moves green 0 1 2 disqualified

  27. (6,1)-Pathological Liar Game Paul’s goal: preserve¸ 1 chip after t=6 time steps wt3(x)=23-1 t=3 Paul bipartitions Carole moves purple 0 1 2 disqualified

  28. (6,1)-Pathological Liar Game Paul’s goal: preserve¸ 1 chip after t=6 time steps wt2(x)=22-1 t=4 Paul bipartitions Carole moves purple 0 1 2 disqualified

  29. (6,1)-Pathological Liar Game Paul’s goal: preserve¸ 1 chip after t=6 time steps wt1(x)=21-1 t=5 Carole moves green Paul bipartitions 0 1 2 disqualified

  30. (6,1)-Pathological Liar Game Paul’s goal: preserve¸ 1 chip after t=6 time steps wt0(x)=20-1<1 t=6 0 1 2 disqualified No chips survive: Paul loses

  31. 31 Optimal (6,1)-Codes

  32. 32 New Approach to the Pathological Liar Game Spencer and Winkler (`92) reduced the liar game to the liar machine, a discrete diffusion process on the integer line. Ellis and Yan (`04) introduced the pathological liar game. Cooper and Spencer (`06) use discrepancy analysis to compare the Propp-machine to simple random walk on Zd. Here: (1) We reduce the pathological liar game to the liar machine, (2) Use discrepancy analysis to compare the liar machine to simple random walk on Z, and thereby (3) Improve the best known pathological liar game strategy when the number of lies is a constant fraction of the number of rounds.

  33. 33 Liar Machine vs. Pathological Liar Game 9 chips -9 -9 -8 -8 -7 -7 -6 -6 -5 -5 -4 -4 -3 -3 -2 -2 -1 -1 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 t=0 9 chips disqualified

  34. 34 Liar Machine vs. Pathological Liar Game -9 -9 -8 -8 -7 -7 -6 -6 -5 -5 -4 -4 -3 -3 -2 -2 -1 -1 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 t=1 disqualified

  35. 35 Liar Machine vs. Pathological Liar Game -9 -9 -8 -8 -7 -7 -6 -6 -5 -5 -4 -4 -3 -3 -2 -2 -1 -1 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 t=2 disqualified

  36. 36 Liar Machine vs. Pathological Liar Game -9 -9 -8 -8 -7 -7 -6 -6 -5 -5 -4 -4 -3 -3 -2 -2 -1 -1 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 t=3 disqualified

  37. 37 Liar Machine vs. Pathological Liar Game -9 -9 -8 -8 -7 -7 -6 -6 -5 -5 -4 -4 -3 -3 -2 -2 -1 -1 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 t=4 disqualified

  38. 38 Liar Machine vs. Pathological Liar Game -9 -9 -8 -8 -7 -7 -6 -6 -5 -5 -4 -4 -3 -3 -2 -2 -1 -1 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 t=5 disqualified

  39. 39 Liar Machine vs. Pathological Liar Game -9 -9 -8 -8 -7 -7 -6 -6 -5 -5 -4 -4 -3 -3 -2 -2 -1 -1 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 t=6 No chips survive: Paul loses disqualified

  40. 40 (6,1)-Pathological Liar Game, Liar Machine -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 disqualified (6,1)-liar machine optimum: Minimum number of initial chips for ¸ 1 chip to be at position · -4 when t=6 (6,1)-Liar machine started with 12 chips after 6 rounds

  41. Reduction: Pathological Liar Game ! Liar Machine

  42. Reduction to Liar Machine

  43. Example position vector u=(0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,1) 0 1 2 disqualified

  44. Liar Machine Versus Linear Machine

  45. 45 Saving One Chip in the Liar Machine

  46. Pathological Liar Game Theorem

  47. 47 Further Exploration • Tighten the discrepancy analysis for the special case of initial chip configuration f0(z)=M 0(z). • Generalize from binary questions to q-ary questions, q¸ 2. • Improve analysis of the original liar game from Spencer and Winkler `92. • Prove general pointwise and interval discrepancy theorems for various discretizations of random walks.

  48. 48 Reading List • This paper: Linearly bounded liars, adaptive covering codes, and deterministic random walks, preprint (see homepage). • The liar machine • Joel Spencer and Peter Winkler. Three thresholds for a liar. Combin. Probab. Comput.,1(1):81-93, 1992. • The pathological liar game • Robert Ellis, Vadim Ponomarenko, and Catherine Yan. The Renyi-Ulam pathological liar game with a fixed number of lies. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 112(2):328-336, 2005. • Discrepancy of deterministic random walks • Joshua Cooper and Joel Spencer, Simulating a Random Walk with Constant Error, Combinatorics, Probability, and Computing, 15 (2006), no. 06, 815-822. • Joshua Cooper, Benjamin Doerr, Joel Spencer, and Gabor Tardos. Deterministic random walks on the integers. European J. Combin., 28(8):2072-2090, 2007.

More Related