1 / 38

— presented by — Chris Korb, MM, MT-BC Maya Story, MA, MT-BC and Soul Song Project Team

— presented by — Chris Korb, MM, MT-BC Maya Story, MA, MT-BC and Soul Song Project Team Western Region AMTA April 1, 2011. — presented by — Chris Korb, MM, MT-BC Director of Music Therapy Marylhurst University Oregon, USA and Soul Song Project Team World Congress XII of Music Therapy

ailani
Download Presentation

— presented by — Chris Korb, MM, MT-BC Maya Story, MA, MT-BC and Soul Song Project Team

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. — presented by — Chris Korb, MM, MT-BCMaya Story, MA, MT-BC and Soul Song Project Team Western Region AMTA April 1, 2011

  2. — presented by — Chris Korb, MM, MT-BCDirector of Music TherapyMarylhurst UniversityOregon, USA and Soul Song Project Team World Congress XII of Music Therapy B. A. Argentina

  3. Why?

  4. History of Project — Year One • Review of Literature – Choral Literature – Music & Healing – Music Education – Music Therapy in the USA, around the globe… • Seek Grant Funding • Consultants for SSP

  5. Review of Literature — Physiological Research • Respiratory • Energy Levels • Stress

  6. Review of Literature — Emotional Research • Affect • Quality of Life • Mood

  7. Singing in a choir significantly improves participants’ energy, stress, and mood and leads to an overall increase in quality of life. An Hypothesis Emerges —

  8. History of Project — Year Two Pilot Studies Begin Portland, Oregon —Collegiate choir Waverly Iowa —Collegiate choir

  9. History of Project : Year Two Pilot Study 1 • Marylhurst UniversityConcert Chorale(Portland, Oregon • Start date: Winter, 2007 • Research collateral • Conductor • Research team member assigned

  10. History of Project : Year Two Pilot Study 2 • Wartburg College Castle Singers(Waverly, Iowa) • Start date: Spring, 2007 • Conductor • Research team member assigned

  11. Research Methodology

  12. Participants Survey & Consent Form Research Methodology —

  13. Research Methodology : Surveys • Personal & demographic information — • Social • Spiritual • Musical • Physical • Emotional • Mental

  14. Research Methodology : Surveys

  15. Participants Self-EvaluationForm Research Methodology —

  16. Research Methodology : Self-Evaluation

  17. Preliminary Observations & Results

  18. Preliminary Observations & Results — Data Collection Two methods

  19. Preliminary Observations & Results — All participants, — all rehearsalsStandard Deviations:

  20. Energy-Stress-Mood Marylhurst Choir(n=8) (near beginning of term) Stress: pre = 4.9 post= 3.1 (t = 2.98, P=.01) Preliminary Observations & Results — Examples from specific rehearsals:

  21. Preliminary Observations & Results — Wartburg Choir(n=16)(near end of term)Energy:pre = 5.5(t = 2.32, P=.02) post = 6.4Stress:pre= 7.6(3.36, P=.01) post= 6.2

  22. Preliminary Observations & Results — Wartburg choir(n=14)(near end of term)Energy:pre = 6.0(t=3.77, P=.01) post = 7.1Stress:pre= 7.2(t=1.99, P=.02) post= 6.2Mood:pre=6.3(t=2.24, P=.02) post=7.1

  23. Preliminary Observations & Results — Correlations observed to date Within the survey & demographic data: • Mental & emotional • Mental & social • Spiritual & emotional

  24. Preliminary Observations & Results — Correlations observed to date(Continued) Within the sessions, pre-post for Stress, Energy, and Mood: • Mood difference &Energy difference • Stress difference & Emotional Benefit

  25. History of Project — Refinement of the process Year Three • Choir Coordinator’sChecklist • POMS tool • Additional choirs‘on board’ Grant writing . . .

  26. History of Project — Year Three Choirs ‘on board’ for 2008 • North County ChorusPaso Robles, California • Kardon ChoralePhiladelphia, Pennsylvania • SUNY Albany Community ChoirAlbany, New York • Wartburg College Castle SingersWaverly, Iowa • Marylhurst University Community ChoralePortland, Oregon =FALL’2008

  27. History of Project — Year Three Kardon Chorale

  28. Modified Pre-Post Graphics for Kardon Chorale

  29. Modified Pre-Post Graphics for Kardon Chorale Energy Stress Mood

  30. Data analysis in process History of Project — Year Three

  31. Looking Ahead —What’sPossible . . .

  32. Looking Ahead — What’s Possible . . . Tasks to be continued: • Choirs &coordinators • Control groups • Grant writers FUNDING, FUNDING!!

  33. Looking Ahead — What’s Possible . . . • Short term studies with select choirs and/or • Longitudinal aspect: specific participants

  34. Looking Ahead — What’s Possible . . . Dual-Phase Recruitment • Participating choirs • Individuals within the choirs

  35. We invite you to join us and participate!

  36. Research Team Members: Liska McNally, MT-BCPortland, ORAdministrative Choir Coordinator Ted Owen, MT-BCPortland, ORMarketing Communications Director RebbeccaVickerman, MT-BCPortland, ORSSP Choir Liaison Scott Copeland, MSPortland, OR Data Analyst Angie Kopshy, Student MTPortland, ORSSP Choir Liaison Jodi Winnwalker, LSW,MT-BC Portland, ORSpecial Projects Mgr.

  37. Research Team Members(cont.): Maria Olaya, PhD Translator Cheryl Dileo, PhD Research consultant Becky Engen, PhD Research consultant Tony Wigram, PhD Research consultant

  38. CIAO!

More Related