1 / 15

2) Super Continent cyclisity (?) and Wilson cycle tectonics

2) Super Continent cyclisity (?) and Wilson cycle tectonics . Does the earth’s continental lithosphere go thorough stages of assembly and disintegration to produce periods when most continents are united into one, a Supercontinent?.

aerona
Download Presentation

2) Super Continent cyclisity (?) and Wilson cycle tectonics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2) Super Continent cyclisity (?) and Wilson cycle tectonics Does the earth’s continental lithosphere go thorough stages of assembly and disintegration to produce periods when most continents are united into one, aSupercontinent?. The Wilson Cycle:named after J. Tuzo Wilson, one of the founding fathers of plate-tectonics and discoverer of transform faults. Wilson used his reference background, in the North Atlantic realm and the Appalachian - Caledonian orogenic belts on both sides of the Atlantic ocean to formulate a hypothesis saying that the building of mountain belts have a close relationship to the opening and closure of oceans with oceanic lithosphere. Hence he introduced the term ”the Proto-Atlantic” as a name for the postulated ocean that according to the model once opened and closed to produce the Appalachians and the Caledonides Traditional Wilson cycle model: Orthogonal opening and closure like on the previous slide, two-dimensional models. Modified Wilson cycle model: Wilson-cycle type tectonics with a modern approach;---one ocean opening--- another closing, cf. The Caledonian Wilson cycle or the Indian ocean opening -- eastern Tethyan closing.

  2. Supercontinent cyclisity? From Rodinia to Pangea and a future supercontinent?? Does the earth´s continental lithospheric plates assemble and rift apart in longer term cycles?

  3. 460 Ma 460 Ma 440 Ma 440 Ma 400 Ma 420 Ma 500 Ma Caledonian orogenic cycle in brief BALTICA a separate continent ≈ 550-425Ma Notice that traditional Wilson-cycle tectonics does not work to explain formation of the Caledonides http://www.geodynamics.no/platemotions/500-400/

  4. A Wilson cycle produces geo-tectonic rock units characteristic of the various stages of the cycle. Continental rift (rift sediments and magmatic products) 2) Volcanic or non-volcanic passive margins (rift margin with thinned continental crust and associated sedimentary and volcanic products 3) Ocean continent transitional crust (highly stretched crust and dyke intruded crust) 4) Oceanic crust w/exotic elements (continental crust fragments, ocean islands hot-spots, transform complexes etc.) Intra-oceanic convergent margins (subduction complexes, island-arcs and back-arc complexes etc) 6) Ophiolite/island arc obduction 7) Andean margins (composite batholiths) Continent - continent collision Some important geotectonic rock units cannot be directly related to stages in Wilson cycles. Most prominent are the Large Igneous Provinces (LIPS). Also other features f.example Impact structures

  5. Large-scale tectonic rift types: Atlantic-type rifts Back-arc rifts Syn-orogenic rifting and wrenching Post-orogenic extension Mantle plumes and hot spots Other large-scale classification: Active rifts ( ≈ 1; 2; 5 above) Passive rifts ( ≈ 3 & 4 above) (key ref: Ziegler and Cloething 2003)

  6. MODELS ARGUING CONTINUOUS VS. DISCONTINUOUS STRETCHING OF CRUST AND MANTLE LITHOSPHERE

  7. MODELS ARGUING SYMMETRICAL VS. ASYMMETRICAL STRETCHING OF CRUST AND MANTLE LITHOSPHERE What are the implications for: Localization of magmatism Areas of subsidence vs. uplift

  8. Doming by asthenosphere upwelling/thermal erosion of lithosphere Doming by ponding of melts near the crust-mantle boundary

  9. Mathematically calculated passive margin formation with continental breakup. The crust was broken when it was thinner than a critical thickness (here 5 km) and oceanic crust was created applying a spreading velocity of 0.1 cm/year. The mathematical model is based on kinematic thinning including processes such as temperature advection and diffusion, lithospheric flexure and sediment compaction. A) Mathematically calculated temperature field for a sedimentary basin formed by extension. B) Plot of temperature versus depth. C) The corresponding crustal section providing the thickness of the upper and lower crust. From Schmalholtz et al, PGP

  10. Duration of rifting in failed rifts

  11. Duration of rifting in successful rifts that went on to produce oceanic lithsphere.

  12. Problems with the Crust-mantle boundary: P-wave velocity (Vp) from V-7.8 to 8.0–8.2 km/s, (crustal granulites and the olivine-dominated mantle–lithosphere). The continental Moho is not always a sharp discontinuity, but often a complex and variable transition zone that generally ranges in thickness between < 1 and 5 km, but can expand to 10 km.

  13. The commonly observed mismatch between measured extension from fault-heave and from the crustal configuration

  14. Ocean continent transitional crust on the Norwegian Sea Atlantic margin (highly stretched and dyke and sill intruded crust) Notice the crustal extension/subsidence vs. lack of faults to accommodate the extension. We can study transitional crust with abundant sheeted dykes within the Seve Nappe Complex in the Scandinavian Caledonides

  15. Transitional crust from the distal Caledonian margin of Baltica is preserved (obducted) within the Seve Nappe Complex in Scandinavia

More Related