1 / 36

Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B)

Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B). Surveillance and Broadcast Services Office ATO-E. Who We Are. The ADS-B program is represented by the Surveillance and Broadcast Services Office, established by the Joint Resource Council September 9, 2005.

Sophia
Download Presentation

Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) Surveillance and Broadcast Services Office ATO-E

  2. Who We Are The ADS-B program is represented by the Surveillance and Broadcast Services Office, established by the Joint Resource Council September 9, 2005. Program Manager- Vincent Capezzuto Vincent.Capezzuto@faa.gov

  3. Office of the Administrator- Marion Blakey Who We Are Chief Operating Officer- Russ Chew Vice President Of En Route and Oceanic Services-Rick Day En Route Surveillance and Broadcast Services Office- Vincent Capezzuto

  4. Automatic Dependant Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) Description • Automatic • Periodically transmits information with no pilot or operator input required • Dependent • Position and velocity vector are derived from the Global Positioning System (GPS) or a Flight Management System (FMS) • Surveillance • A method of determining position of aircraft, vehicles, or other assets • Broadcast • Transmitted information available to anyone with the appropriate receiving equipment GPS Based ADS-B

  5. ADS-B Description • Full implementation of ADS-B capabilities requires • Aircraft avionics equipage (datalink radio and/or display capability) • Ground stations supporting datalink to aircraft • Integration into existing Air Traffic Control (ATC) automation systems (Micro EARTS, Common ARTS, STARS, ASDE-X, ERAM)

  6. ADS-B Data-link • Two ADS-B “links” or frequencies are approved by the FAA • Mode S “extended squitter” (1090 MHz) • Used for most commercial aircraft • Universal Access Transceiver (UAT) (978 MHz) • Typically used for other aircraft and vehicles • Dual links may require a multilink or ADS- Rebroadcast (ADS-R) function to ensure 1090 and UAT users see each other UAT 1090 UAT 1090

  7. ADS-B message includes: Heading Altitude Call sign Speed Distance Aircraft category Aircraft CDTI Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) • Aircraft / vehicle “broadcasts” known GPS position and additional data • Radar like display for ADS-B traffic in aircraft cockpit or vehicle • Other capabilities include broadcast traffic information, terrain, and weather (via FIS-B and TIS-B services) Notional implementation of display

  8. Radar Weather Aeronautical Information Control Facility ADS-B BroadcastServices Traffic Information Service – Broadcast (TIS-B) • TIS-B broadcasts surveillance data Flight Information Service – Broadcast (FIS-B) • Graphical NEXRAD Weather, meteorological observations, and Terminal Area Forecasts (TAFs) broadcast from ground stations • Early planned enhancements include graphical Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) and additional graphical weather products * These services are advisory *Notional physical architecture

  9. Why deploy an ADS-B system? • An ADS-B system provides the air/ground infrastructure upon which applications can be deployed when available to obtain additional benefits • Air-to-air applications • Other information services • Surveillance Information

  10. Approach: Initial ADS-B Applications Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Requirements Definition – Segment 1, 2 & 3

  11. Proposed Capabilities Air-to-Air • Improved Separation Standards • Improved Low-Visibility Approaches • Enhanced See and Avoid • Enhanced Operations for En Route Air-to-Air Air-to-Ground • Surveillance Coverage in Radar / Non-Radar Airspace Ground-to-Ground • Improved Navigation on Taxiways • Enhanced Controller Management of Surface Traffic Ground-to-Air & Self-Contained • Weather and SSR Traffic to the Cockpit • Affordable Reduction of Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT)

  12. General Rulemaking Process RPR Process* NPRM Process* Final Rule Process** OPR identifies need for rulemaking Rulemaking team drafts NPRM Comment period closes Final team concurrence 40 Days 2 Weeks OPR prepares Phase I RPR 8-12 Months Rulemaking team disposes of comments Economist draft economic evaluation Internal FAA coordination 45 Days 90 Day Comment Period Council approves Phase I RPR Meets every 6 weeks Rulemaking team prepares Phase III RPR Final team concurrence Significant? OST Review and OMB Review Yes 120 Days 120 Days No RPR team prepares Phase II RPR Council approves Phase III RPR Internal FAA coordination 1-3 Months Federal Register publishes final rule 15 Days 2 - 4 Weeks Council approves Phase II RPR Subtotal = 16 Months Rulemaking team drafts final rule Significant? OST Review and OMB Review 6 Months Yes Expedited Approach No Economist prepares Regulatory Evaluation End Federal Register publishes NPRM Subtotal = 18 – 24.5 Months Total = 34 Months – 40.5 Months 45 Days 2 Weeks **Source: FAA Office of Rulemaking Quality Management System Rulemaking Manual; Average timeframes provided, actual timeframes depend on size and complexity of project *Estimated durations and diagram provided by AVS/Mitre

  13. Approach: ADS-B Program Segments

  14. Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B)Stakeholders Meeting

  15. Agenda • Program Status • Objective • Approach • Products • Schedule • Summary • Issues • Discussion Points • Action Items

  16. Program Status • Office of the Administrator (AOA) / Office of the Deputy Administrator (ADA) • February 1, 2006 • February 6, 2006 • February 21, 2006 • JRC on February 10, 2006 • Executive Council • December 20, 2005 • January 18, 2006 (post OPS Daily Brief) • January 31, 2006 • Aviation Safety (AVS) Strategy Meeting • January 6, 2006 • January 18, 2006 • ATO-S • Independent Operational Test & Evaluation Office (IOT&E) on January 27, 2006 • Safety Management on February 16, 2006 • Office of Airports (ARP) Strategy Meeting on January 17, 2006 • ATO-P Transition Discussion on January 20, 2006 • Capstone-Juneau Discussions • January 19, 2006 • February 10, 2006 • February 17, 2006

  17. Program Status (Continued) • Office of Chief Counsel - Acquisition & Hearing Branch (AGC-500) on January 18, 2006 • Office of Public Affairs on January 19, 2006 • Mitre Corporation Center for Advanced Aviation System Development (CAASD) • January 12, 2006 • February 3, 2006 • Air Traffic Management (ATM) Steering Group on January 20, 2006 • RTCA Government / Industry Initial ADS-B Implementation Strategy Group • January 31, 2006 • February 6, 2006 • February 8, 2006 • February 17, 2006 • Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO) • January 26, 2006 • February 3, 2006 • February 13, 2006 • Department of Defense (DoD) on February 15, 2006 • Government Accountability Office (GAO) on January 23, 2006 • Air Transport Association (ATA) on January 18, 2006 • Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) on January 19, 2006 • Helicopter Association International (HAI) on February 10, 2006

  18. Program Status (Continued) • Industry Meetings • ITT Industries on February 15, 2006 • Northrop Grumman on February 14, 2006 • Sensis on February 9, 2006 • Rannoch on February 7, 2006 • Aviation Communication & Surveillance Systems (ACSS) on February 22, 2006 • Established Recurring Meetings • Risk Board • Benefits • Investment Analysis • Schedule Review • JPDO Roadmap

  19. Objective • Develop a multi-segment, life cycle managed, performance based ADS-B strategy that aligns with the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NGATS) vision and generates value for the National Airspace System (NAS) • Integrate Concept of Operations for Portfolio of ADS-B Applications • Develop Application Life Cycle Management Approach • Portfolio Management for Applications • Requirements Management Across the Applications • Performance Criteria Management • Establish Infrastructure • Continuously Monitor Value and Adjust Investments

  20. Approach: Initial ADS-B Applications Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Requirements Definition – Segment 1, 2 & 3

  21. Approach: ADS-B Program Segments

  22. Products: Segment 1 • Program Charter • Program Management Plan (PMP) • Integrated Concept of Operations (CONOPS) • Requirements Mapped to Applications • Safety Assessment Consistent with Safety Management System (SMS) • Business Case for Limited Surveillance and Traffic / Flight Information Broadcast Services Deployment (June 2006) • OMB Exhibit-300 (Includes Attachments 1 and 2: Business Case Analysis Report and Program Requirements) • Benefits Model • Cost Model • Economic Analysis • Business Case for Segment 2 (February 2007) • Deploy and Certify Equipment to Support Service Delivery in Selected Locations • Certification of ADS-B Based Separation Standards for 3 and 5 Miles • ADS-B “Out” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

  23. JRC-2B Schedule: Investment Analysis

  24. Proposed Schedule: Segments 1, 2, 3, 4 • Segment 1 (2007 – 2010): • Begin Avionics Equipage: FY 2007 • Expand TIS-B / FIS-B Infrastructure: FY 2007 – FY 2010 • Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Requirements Definition: FY 2007 – FY 2010 • ADS-B “Out” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) Issued: FY 2008 • Begin Initial Aircraft to Aircraft Application Deployment: FY 2008 • Targeted ADS-B Infrastructure Deployment: FY 2010 • Segment 2 (2010 – 2014): • ADS-B “Out” Final Rule Published: FY 2010 • Continue Initial Aircraft to Aircraft Application Deployment: FY 2010 – FY 2014 • Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Application Deployment: FY 2010 – FY 2014 • Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Requirements Definition: FY 2010 – FY 2014 • Complete TIS-B / FIS-B Deployment: FY 2012 • Complete ADS-B NAS Wide Infrastructure Deployment: FY 2013 • Complete 40% Avionics: FY 2014 • Segment 3 (2015 – 2020): • Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Requirements Definition: FY 2015 – FY 2020 • Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Application Deployment: FY 2015 – FY 2020 • Targeted Removal of Legacy Surveillance: FY 2018 – FY 2020 • Complete 100% Avionics: FY 2020 • Complete Initial Aircraft to Aircraft Application Deployment: FY 2020 • Segment 4 (2021 – 2025): • Complete Removal of Targeted Legacy Surveillance: FY 2023 • TIS-B Removal: FY 2025 • Complete Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Application Deployment: FY 2025

  25. Summary: Segment 1 • Integrate Concept of Operations and Requirements for ADS-B • Establish Cost, Schedule and Technical Performance Segment 1 Baseline • Deploy / Upgrade systems at targeted locations • Provide operational NAS-wide Air Traffic Control (ATC) services • Confirm minimum avionics performance to ensure future utility • Prepare documentation to support ADS-B “Out” rulemaking notice (NPRM) • Finalize architecture for ADS-B including backup strategy • Additional aircraft to aircraft requirements definition

  26. Summary (Continued) • Combines risk mitigation activities with opportunity to achieve near-term benefits • Establishes high priority rulemaking team • Represents collaborative FAA / industry effort • Achieves balanced customer – owner – employee approach

  27. Program Issues • ADS-B “Out” Mandate Strategy • User acceptance critical to success • ADS-B Back-up Strategy Requires Refinement • GPS availability interdependencies affects airborne navigation and surveillance • Existing primary and / or secondary surveillance • Operational Air Traffic • Separation Standards • ATC Display • Ability of Users to Remove Selected Legacy Avionics with Full ADS-B Implementation • Effects of 1090 Mhz Uplink Saturation in High Density Airspace

  28. Discussion Points • Research & Development (R&D) Transition Criteria To Service Units • Capstone Program Seeking In-Service Decision (ISD) • System-Wide Information Management (SWIM) scheduled for JRC • Communications • Coordinated FAA Program Office • International • CONUS / Alaska / Hawaii • Department of Defense (DoD) • Personnel Acquisition • AVS • ATO-E • AVS-1 Letter

  29. Action Items • Provide ADS-B Program Charter for Signature to the Executive Council • Signature of Rulemaking Project Record, Phase I • Signatories: • Vice President, AJE-0 – Rick Day • Director, AIR-1 – John Hickey • Director, AFS-1 – Jim Ballough • Chief Operating Officer, AJO-0 – Russ Chew • Associate Administrator, AVS-1 – Nick Sabatini • Chief Counsel, AGC-1 – Andy Steinberg

  30. Backup

  31. General Rulemaking Process RPR Process* NPRM Process* Final Rule Process** OPR identifies need for rulemaking Rulemaking team drafts NPRM Comment period closes Final team concurrence 40 Days 2 Weeks OPR prepares Phase I RPR 8-12 Months Rulemaking team disposes of comments Economist draft economic evaluation Internal FAA coordination 45 Days 90 Day Comment Period Council approves Phase I RPR Meets every 6 weeks Rulemaking team prepares Phase III RPR Final team concurrence Significant? OST Review and OMB Review Yes 120 Days 120 Days No RPR team prepares Phase II RPR Council approves Phase III RPR Internal FAA coordination 1-3 Months Federal Register publishes final rule 15 Days 2 - 4 Weeks Council approves Phase II RPR Subtotal = 16 Months Rulemaking team drafts final rule Significant? OST Review and OMB Review 6 Months Yes Expedited Approach No Economist prepares Regulatory Evaluation End Federal Register publishes NPRM Subtotal = 18 – 24.5 Months Total = 34 Months – 40.5 Months 45 Days 2 Weeks **Source: FAA Office of Rulemaking Quality Management System Rulemaking Manual; Average timeframes provided, actual timeframes depend on size and complexity of project *Estimated durations and diagram provided by AVS/Mitre

  32. Rulemaking Management Council • The Core Council members are: • The Director of the Office of Rulemaking, who is the Council chair • A representative from the Office of the Chief Counsel’s (AGC) Regulation Division • A representative from the Office of Aviation Policy and Plans’ (APO) Regulatory Analysis Division • The Office of Rulemaking Division Managers • The Council meets about six times each year. The Council’s meeting calendar is available in CyberDocs No. 18748.

  33. Resources: Functional Disciplines ADS-B Program Manager Stakeholder Interface Admin Timecards Schedule Correspondence Supplies Travel Services Integrator of Cost, Schedule, and Technical performance External • DoD/DHS • ICAO • JPDO • RTCA • Foreign Regulatory Agencies • State Dept Internal • ATO • AVS • CAPSTONE • WAAS/LAAS • Surveillance Systems Engineering Aircraft Certification and Operations SE Process planning Requirements analysis Functional analysis/allocation Design Synthesis Tech Refresh Test & Evaluation System Control • Configuration Management • Data Management • Technical reviews & audits • Quality Control • Interface Management • Modeling & Simulation • Performance Metrics System Analysis • Trade Studies • Risk Management Specialty Engineering • Security • Safety • Human Factors Research Communications Contracts Legal Ops Support Financial Avionic Standards Rulemaking Legal Policy and Guidance Certification Operational Evaluation • Flight crew workload • Infrastructure • Avionics Equipage Operational Approval Continued Airworthiness Contract Review Industry Interface Dispute Resolution Rulemaking Policy Internal • Public Affairs • Briefing support External • Govt & Industry OMB 300 EVM PR’s Travel budget Spend Plans Acq. Planning Obtain info Source selection Contract Admin. ATC AF Flight Crew Safety Design/ Production Implementation Logistics SMS Integrator Safety Risk Management (SRM) • SRMD • SRMDM • SRM Panel coordination • Hazard Control/Mitigation coordination • Coordinate with Safety Manager • Respond to Audit request IOT&E NAILS Material Mgmt Training Development Avionics Ground Infrastructure Interoperability Cert. Standards Integration Ops Procedures Production Test Site Design Site Acquisition Site Prep Installation Joint Acceptance A/C Avionics

  34. JRC-2A: Economic Analysis(Risk-Adjusted Results)

  35. JRC-2A: Total Costs: (Point Estimate)

  36. JRC-2A: Total Benefits (Point Estimate)

More Related