Counting animals from space
Download
1 / 22

Counting Animals from Space: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 307 Views
  • Updated On :

Counting Animals from Space:. Chapter Two Transitions from Captivity to Wild Places. Scott Bergen & Eric Sanderson. Why Count Wildlife?. Fundamental to Conservation Foundational to Population Studies Federal Programs Spend Millions of Dollars Annual to Count Animals. Nov. 10, 2004.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Counting Animals from Space:' - Pat_Xavi


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Counting animals from space l.jpg

Counting Animals from Space:

Chapter Two

Transitions from Captivity to

Wild Places

Scott Bergen & Eric Sanderson


Why count wildlife l.jpg
Why Count Wildlife?

  • Fundamental to Conservation

  • Foundational to Population Studies

  • Federal Programs Spend Millions of Dollars Annual to Count Animals


Nov 10 2004 l.jpg
Nov. 10, 2004

10:52:45 am

35 people involved

21 keepers

15 Volunteers

28 Enclosures mapped for individual animal locations

300 Faux fur targets placed in 4 ‘habitats’

Digital Globe Inc ©


Ground vs sky l.jpg
Ground –vs- Sky

Digital Globe Inc ©


Information shadow l.jpg
Information Shadow

Digital Globe Inc ©


Tallying identification by species l.jpg
Tallying Identification by Species

Logit (identified targets) = -3.666 + 0.019(Color) + 0.970(Size) - 0.230(VegHt) - 0.421(Shade).



Counting animals l.jpg
Counting Animals

  • Most reliable estimate use transect with repeat measures

  • Population estimates w/ standard deviation

  • Findings usually extrapolated from small area to available habitat or other limiting feature

  • Costly to count animals on ground

  • Remote sensing rarely used (aerial imagery)

  • Time and scale rarely match satellite scale & time

  • Mismatch in terms of time and location in reference to identifying- verifying high spatial resolution satellite imagery


Why the national elk refuge l.jpg
Why the National Elk Refuge?

  • Reliable elk & bison congregations during winter

  • Logistic regression equation shows good fit for size, color, vegetation and shadow

  • Annual census of both elk and bison


Animal count comparisons l.jpg
Animal Count Comparisons

  • Refuge level, elk (weekly), bison (annual)

  • Ground census estimate @ time of satellite acquisition

  • Panoramic photo estimate @ time of satellite acquisition

  • Heads up digitizing estimate

  • Object oriented estimate


Jackson wyoming l.jpg
Jackson Wyoming

  • Access limited

  • Freakin’ cold -20f

  • Snow bleaching histogram of sensor

Digital Globe Inc ©


Ground census of elk group l.jpg
Ground Census of Elk Group

  • High Ground limited

  • Limited by distance

  • 1360 individuals

  • 60/40 female- male ratio


Thick in elk l.jpg
Thick In Elk

Digital Globe Inc ©


Panaramic resesults l.jpg
Panaramic Resesults

  • Verified over 1,000 elk sex, position, direction position in less than 10 seconds

  • Estimated 1070 individuals

  • 679 females, 299 males, 89 ?

  • Knew there were more but individuals > 1km were not identifiable as well as those totally blocked by other elk


Heads up l.jpg
Heads up

  • 1503 individuals

Digital Globe Inc ©


Object oriented approach l.jpg
Object Oriented Approach

  • Scale based segmentation

  • > classification

  • > revision

  • >classification

  • Hierarchical strutured

  • Means both smaller and larger

Digital Globe Inc ©


Segmentation l.jpg
Segmentation

  • Adds new dimensions to data

  • Area, spectra, variability within polygons

  • Adjacency

  • Contextual

  • Generates data Important to distinguish animals and differentiate types of animals


Initial classification l.jpg
Initial Classification

  • Good Results

  • Identified 1540 individuals

  • Misidentification within riparian areas

  • Grouped elk in close proximity


Classification l.jpg
Classification

  • Refined with an area classifier

  • 1482 individuals

  • Further refinement, standing – sitting, elk vs bison, sexes in bison



Summary of animal counts l.jpg
Summary of Animal Counts

  • Park Estimate: 4,900 elk, 951 bison

  • Ground Estimate: 1,360 elk, 60/40 f/m

  • Panoramic: 1,071 elk, 69/31 f/m

  • Heads up: 1,503 elk

  • 1st Object Oriented Class: 1,540

  • Ob. Orient w/ Area: 1,480



ad