If you or a participant of your household have had a transvaginal net implant and also suffered complications from this then you might be entitled to compensation. You have to discuss this with qualified Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit that will would like to review numerous aspects of your case before choosing whether to go on with Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit. Click this site http://www.lawsuitsmedical.com/transvaginal-mesh/ for more information on Transvaginal Mesh Attorney.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
The term “transvaginal” means “through the vagina”. Also known as a vaginal tape, sling or patch, a transvaginal mesh implant is a surgical mesh device which is used to treat urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women.
There have been a number of product liability lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products including American Medical Systems, Bard, Boston Scientific and a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson named Ethicon. The main claim in the lawsuits is that the transvaginal mesh were incorrectly designed leading to many serious side effects.
If you or a member of your family have had a transvaginal mesh implant and suffered complications from this then you may be entitled to compensation. You need to discuss this with competent transvaginal mesh lawyers who will want to discuss several aspects of your case before deciding whether to go ahead with a mesh implant lawsuit..
Only experienced transvaginal mesh attorneys can make the decision as to whether your surgical mesh lawsuit will stand up in court so make sure that you consult with them.
The treatment of pelvic organ prolapsed with transvaginal mesh surgery was shown to have more risks than other surgical procedures according to the FDA in 2011. The FDA made clear that this did not apply to a mesh that was implanted abdominally or that this related to the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. The safety and effectiveness of these procedures was to be discussed by another advisory committee.
Prior to the approval of the transvaginal mesh, pelvic organ prolapsed and stress urinary incontinence were tackled using a procedure known as abdominal sacrocpopexy and there was no mesh involved. The procedure relied upon the support of the weakened muscles to come from the patient’s own ligaments. With transvaginal mesh surgery, a support sling is created by weaving the mesh through the pelvic tissue and placing it underneath the urethra thereby supporting the urethra when pressure is applied.
In a number of transvaginal mesh lawsuits, it was claimed that the manufacturers had failed to warn of the serious risks involved and that expected safety standards had not been met. It was the view of some in the industry that the design of the mesh was defective and that the main complications present themselves because nutrients are prevented from being received by surrounding tissue. They also stated that the mesh can shrink or migrate and also erode into the vagina causing infections, pelvic pain and urinary complications.
For inquiries please visit :
We’d like to connect with you.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit