1 / 1

Choosing a Surface Finish

Function. Tolerance Considerations. Part Use. Component Strength. Is a smooth surface required? (Examine if/what the part surface might be in contact with, how does this affect the component?). Determine How Surface Finish Will Effect The Materials Strength.

zia
Download Presentation

Choosing a Surface Finish

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Function Tolerance Considerations Part Use Component Strength Is a smooth surface required? (Examine if/what the part surface might be in contact with, how does this affect the component?) Determine How Surface Finish Will Effect The Materials Strength Determine Which Type of Tolerance Applies Unilateral Tolerance: Tolerance in one direction. Bilateral Tolerance: Tolerance is applied above and below. Total Tolerance: The difference between max and min. Unmodified Endurance Limit: Se’=0.504*SUT if SUT <= 200kpsi / 700MPa Se’=100kpsi if SUT > 200kpsi Se’=700MPa if SUT > 1400MPa Specify Material & Define Ultimate Strength: Sut Examine if the component surface needs to be flat or flush with another surface. YES: Use a Finer surface finish. (i.e. 32-4μin) NO: Can use a coarse surface finish. (i.e. 32-250μin) Determine New Endurance Limit with Surface effects: Se=Ka*Se’ Where: Ka-Surface Effect Se-Modified Endurance Limit Se’-Unmodified Endurance Limit YES: A Finer surface finish will provide a more flat surface. NO: Surface Finish can be coarser, because tolerance is not an impeding factor. Determine Ka: Equation Method Ka=a*Sutb Values for a and b Table 7-4. See Below. Determine Ka: Graphical Method Use Figure 4.15 where: Ks=Ka See Below. OR Use Figure 13-3 (below) for Surface vs. Tolerance Criteria Aesthetics Cost $$ Analyze how surface finish affects Material Strength. If the Modified Endurance Limit is not sufficient choose another surface finish method. Appearance can contribute to surface finish criteria as much as cost. How Much Money Do You Have?? Feel, observe, and compare template samples attached to conceptualize various surface finishes: How does 32 compare to 250? Is this surface going to be seen by eyes that matter? If you’re Super Rich: Choose any Surface finish you want!!! If you live in the Real World: Using the cost figure below, find the best surface finish that your cost constraints will allow. NO: This allows for an opportunity to save on cost and choose the cheapest finish that still fits the function constraints. Yes: A finer surface finish will be needed; cost may come second to appearance in this case. Choosing a Surface Finish When determining a surface finish for a component one must use function, cost, and aesthetics for criteria. Out of these three components function has the greatest significance followed by both cost and appearance equally contributing. By evaluating the component one can weight the contribution of each and apply this logic to determine the finish for each surface. Did you know that surface finish is measured in micro-inches, that’s in-6 ? In other words when someone uses the lingo of a 32 surface finish that means 32 micro-inches is the max allowable distance between the varying surface finish. Got the surface finish blues? Follow the flow chart. Sad Student Dr. Doom The surface finish availability for the University of Idaho Machine Shop is 250 micro-inches to 4 micro-inches. References: Mischke, Charles R., Joseph Edward Shigley. Mechanical Engineering Design. McGraw Hill. p. 278, 283, 2002. Fatemi, Ali, Henry O. Fuchs, Ralph Stephens, Robert Stephens. Metal Fatigue in Engineering. Wiley Inter-science. p. 81, 2001. Poster Done By: #8, #19, #44, #52

More Related