280 likes | 366 Views
Stay informed on key updates and policy considerations for CPD programs in fiscal year 2012. Explore funding allocations, challenges, and strategies for effective program management.
E N D
CPD Policy Update NCDA Annual Meeting Palm Springs, CA June 21, 2012
CPD Today • Assistant Secretary Marquez departed May 18, 2012 • Mark Johnston, DAS for Special Needs, has been appointed as Acting Assistant Secretary for remainder of term • Cliff Taffet remains as General Deputy Assistant Secretary • Yolanda Chavez remains as DAS for Grant Programs • Ann Oliva now Acting DAS for Special Needs
FY 2012 Operations • FY 2012 formula allocations announced in January 2012 consistent with 60 day provision of law • Field offices should be fully caught up on reviews of con plans and actions plans, making grants in timely manner • Maintaining monitoring schedule at field office level despite tight budgetary constraints • Funding constraints having impact on ability of field offices to hire staff
CDBG • FY 12 formula funding level - $2.948 billion • Represents 26% reduction in comparison to FY 10 • $300 million from CDF account for disaster recovery purposes (additional $100 million outside budget cap) • $400 million in CDBG DR allocated in January 2012 to 17 grantees (8 states and 9 local governments)
CDBG in FY 13 • House and Senate Appropriations Committees have both reported THUD bill • House - $3.34 billion for formula • Senate - $3.1 billion for formula • Expect consideration by full House next week • Senate timing unknown • Outside possibility that THUD bill could be approved before November elections
Congressional Interest in CDBG • FY 12 appropriation called for two reviews: • GAO to review best practices in formula programs • HUD to report to committees on data systems improvements • House Appropriations Surveys and Investigations on administrative/planning costs • House Appropriations staff questions on activity delivery costs, grandfathered communities, public service cap, American Community Survey
CDBG Policy Considerations • Guidance issued on CDBG-R and NSP 1 closeouts, addressing open activities cites by OIG audit, voluntary grant reductions, • Hoping to issue guidance on mixed use economic development, activities jointly funded by entitlements and states, use of ACS data for low-mod area benefit • Evaluating changes to IDIS performance measurement structure • Other IDIS upgrades
CDBG Issues – IG Audit • Formally issued October 31, 2011 • “HUD did not adequately use its System (IDIS) to provide oversight of activities under the Block Grant program.” • Unaware of how grantees used $67 million to fund more than 1,300 cancelled activities • Lacked oversight of almost $3 billion funding more than 20,000 long-standing open activities
CDBG Issues – IG Audit • Some seriously bad actors • 46 grantees accounted for 11,647 open activities • 64 grantees accounted for $2 billion in open activities • Have reduced open activities to 3,409 or 16.4% of original 20,000, representing 22% of funds • Have reduced canceled/drawn activities to 360, representing 29% of funds • Guidance to field offices to help on tough issues
CDBG Issues – ACS Data • FY 2012 allocations used American Community Survey (ACS) data for 2005-2009 in place of 2000 Census data (plus 2010 population count) • Census long form discontinued • Significant funding changes for many grantees due to new data and reduced appropriation • HUD correctly applied available data consistent with statutory directives • Path of appeal is to Census Bureau
Section 108 • $240 million in guarantee authority in FY 2012 • FY 2013 Administration request was $500 million in guarantee authority along with fee-based approach • Senate adopted Administration proposal while House used traditional credit subsidy approach ($6 million for approximately $250 million) • HUD’s Policy Development and Research Office to issue report on Section 108 program shortly • Need grantees to make use of Section 108 in order to preserve it
NSP Status – June 18, 2012 • NSP 1 = $3.92 billion • 91.45% expended (109.4% obligated) • Grant amount must be expended by March 2013 • NSP2 = $1.93 billion • 66.98% expended • 54 of 56 Grantees met 50% expenditure mark • Must expend 100% of grant amount by February 11, 2013
NSP Status • NSP3 = $970 million • 13% expended • 50% of grant amount to be expended by March 2013, 100% by March 2014 • Working on policies for transition after NSP • Still have technical assistance available, especially for NSP3
Project Rebuild • President Obama included $15 billion for Project Rebuild as part of American Jobs Act • Request repeated as part of FY 2013 budget submission • Introduced in both House and Senate • Would improve upon and expand NSP • $10 billion formula allocation to states and local governments • $5 billion competition to include governmental partners but also non-profits and for-profits
OneCPD TA • OneCPD replaces previous CPD approach to technical assistance • Borrows from and expands upon SNAPS and NSP TA efforts • Almost $70 million available across FY10-12 appropriations • Have already initiated several dozens of engagements from highly targeted to comprehensive • CPD field offices are the access point
Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act • Signed into law on May 20, 2009 • Reauthorizes HUD’s McKinney-Vento Programs • Six sets of Regulations developed: • Definition of Homeless • Continuum of Care Program • Emergency Solutions Grants Program • Conforming Amendments to the Consolidated Plan • Homeless Management Information Systems • Rural Housing Stability Program
Status of the Regulations • Published Proposed Rules: • Homeless Management Information Systems • Published Interim Rules: • Emergency Solutions Grants Program with conforming amendments to the Consolidated Plan • Published Final Rules: • Defining Homeless – amendments to the SHP and S+C regulations • Rules Pending Publication • CoC Program • RHS Program
Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Program • A combination of the current Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG) Program and the Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) • Allocations done by formula based on 20 percent of the available grant funds in the appropriation • Focus on interventions such as rapid re-housing and homelessness prevention
Continuum of Care (CoC) Program • The CoC program is a consolidation of the Supportive Housing Program and Shelter Plus Care program • HEARTH Act codifies the CoC structure and planning process • Provides planning dollars for the CoC and FMR increases for grants currently funded under SHP, and creates a 25 percent overall match.
Rural Housing Stability Assistance Program • Designed to assist individuals and families who are homeless, in imminent danger of losing housing, or in the worst case housing situations • Will allow for new activities such as rehab and repair to housing and mortgage assistance for homeowners • Recipients of funding under this program may not simultaneously receive funding under the CoC program
Resources to Help Communities Up to date information regarding the HEARTH Act, including a copy of the McKinney-Act amended by the HEARTH Act, can be found at http://www.hudhre.info/hearth/ Notification of the availability of future information will be released via HUD’s Homeless Assistance listserv. To join HUD’s listserv, go to http://www.hud.gov/subscribe/mailinglist.cfm and click on “Homeless Assistance Program”
FY12 HOME Appropriation • FY 2012 Appropriation - $1 Billion • Same as FY 1993 funding level • FY 2013 Request - $1 Billion • House mark: $1.2 billion • Senate mark: $1.0 billion • $500,000 minimum qualification threshold to minimize new PJs qualifying at lower $335,000 threshold
FY12 HOME Appropriation • Imposed 4 provisions on 2012 HOME projects • Evaluation of Developer Capacity, Underwriting and Market Demand before committing funds; • Homebuyer Units remaining unsold 6 months after construction must be converted to rental; • Projects not completed 4 years after commitment must be terminated and funds repaid; • PJ must certify that CHDO receiving ‘12 funds has staff with demonstrated development capacity;
FY12 HOME Appropriation • CPD Notice 12-07, Operating Guidance for Implementing FY 2012 Appropriation Requirements explains what the law requires • HUD is hosting 8 webinars to provide technical assistance on practical considerations related to PJ implementation of requirements • Webinar schedule and archived webinars can be found at http:\hometa.info
IDIS System Improvements • Went Live on May 4th • System flags for Projects: • In final draw for > 120 days • With an initial disbursement but no subsequent disbursement for > 180 days • Committed more than 4 years ago, but not completed
IDIS System Improvements • Required Certifications at Project Set-up: • CHDO Capacity • Assessment of Underwriting, Developer Capacity and Neighborhood Market Conditions
HOME Rulemaking • Proposed Rule Published: December 16, 2011 • Public comments were due on February 14, 2012 – HUD received 320 comments • Combined HOME and the Housing Trust Fund Final Rule will go into Departmental clearance this month. • Expected publication this Fall