1 / 22

By Atul Kaushik Director, CUTS Geneva Resource Centre ak@cuts cuts-grc

Fostering Equity and Accountability in the Trading System (FEATS) Project: Meeting with Key Stakeholders Dar-Es-Salaam, 3 March 2010 Inclusiveness of Trade Policy Making in Tanzania: Presentation of the Main Findings of the First Phase Research. By Atul Kaushik

zazu
Download Presentation

By Atul Kaushik Director, CUTS Geneva Resource Centre ak@cuts cuts-grc

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fostering Equity and Accountability in the Trading System (FEATS) Project: Meeting with Key Stakeholders Dar-Es-Salaam, 3 March 2010 Inclusiveness of Trade Policy Making in Tanzania: Presentation of the Main Findings of the First Phase Research By Atul Kaushik Director, CUTS Geneva Resource Centre ak@cuts.org www.cuts-grc.org

  2. Structure of Presentation • Introduction • Trade policy making process in Tanzania: key consultative mechanisms • Challenges in participation: views of stakeholders • Measuring inclusiveness: the Inclusive Trade Policy Making (ITPM) Index • Conclusions and Recommendations

  3. I. Introduction • FEATS first phase research focus on trade policy making process and role of stakeholders in Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia • Importance of inclusive trade policy making to ensure national multi-stakeholder ownership • Two publications titled “Towards More Inclusive Trade Policy Making: Process and Role of Stakeholders in Select African Countries” (full research publication) and “Improving Ownership through Inclusive Trade Policy Making Process: Lessons from Africa” (short advocacy monograph) • Measuring inclusiveness: Inclusive Trade Policy Making (ITPM) Index

  4. II. Trade Policy Making Process in Tanzania: Key Consultative Mechanisms

  5. II. Trade Policy Making Process in Tanzania: Key Consultative Mechanisms

  6. III. Challenges in Participation as Viewed by Stakeholders Ministry of Industry, Trade and Marketing (MITM) • Lack of capacity and technical human resources • Issues of internal and external coordination • Lack of financial and human resources to ensure regular functioning of consultative mechanisms • Complex and evolving nature of trade issues

  7. III. Challenges in Participation as Viewed by Stakeholders Other relevant Government Ministries and Agencies • Lack of capacity and technical human resources • Issues of coordination among governmental machinery • Lack of regular and timely information flow on trade issues • Trade is not primary mandate

  8. III. Challenges in Participation as Viewed by Stakeholders Private Sector Umbrella Organizations • Limited technical understanding, and advocacy capacities • Tight timelines to provide feedback on trade issues • Need to improve opportunities for less powerful business associations • How to represent the informal sector?

  9. III. Challenges in Participation as Viewed by Stakeholders Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) • Limited technical understanding of complex issues • Need for better coordination and information sharing among CSOs • Occasional tensions with the government • Limited opportunities for participation • Lack of resources to maintain sustained engagement and retain the knowledge and expertise gained on trade issues • Issues of representation and mandate?

  10. IV. Measuring inclusiveness: the Inclusive Trade Policy Making (ITPM) Index IPTM Index: Action Variables, Actors and Values Part I: Ministry Responsible for Trade Policy

  11. IV. Measuring inclusiveness: the Inclusive Trade Policy Making (ITPM) Index IPTM Index: Action Variables, Actors and Values Parts II, III, and IV: Other Relevant Government Ministries, Private Sector, and CSOs

  12. IV. Measuring inclusiveness: the Inclusive Trade Policy Making (ITPM) Index Explanation of Possible Action Values • Yes = maximum value of 1 = when appropriate action has been taken by the actor concerned • Many/Most = high value of 0.75 = when quite a lot has been done but some gaps remain • Some = intermediate value of 0.5 = when action has been taken but is not sufficient • Few / Little = low value of 0.25 = when some action has been taken but much remains • No = 0 value assigned = when no action has been taken by the actor concerned

  13. IV. Measuring inclusiveness: the Inclusive Trade Policy Making (ITPM) Index MITM SCORE

  14. IV. Measuring inclusiveness: the Inclusive Trade Policy Making (ITPM) Index Scores by Other Groups of Stakeholders

  15. IV. Measuring inclusiveness: the Inclusive Trade Policy Making (ITPM) Index

  16. IV. Measuring inclusiveness: the Inclusive Trade Policy Making (ITPM) Index

  17. IV. Measuring inclusiveness: the Inclusive Trade Policy Making (ITPM) Index

  18. V. Conclusions and Recommendations • Several consultative mechanisms on trade issues established; however • Lack legal mandates and adequate resources • Not all trade issues covered by multi-stakeholder consultative fora • Irregular and ad hoc functioning • Improved stakeholders participation; but • Not all stakeholders being represented • Not all stakeholders have equal opportunities to participate

  19. V. Conclusions and Recommendations • Remaining challenges classified in three broad categories • Related to capacity (limited technical, human, and financial capacities of stakeholders) • Related to institutional and structural issues (design and functioning of consultative mechanisms) • Related to challenges internal to each group of stakeholders

  20. V. Conclusions and Recommendations • Identification and involvement of remaining stakeholders: action by government and concerned ministries needed • Regular information flow on trade issues to key stakeholders: action by concerned ministries needed • Rationalization and strengthening of consultative mechanisms: action by government and concerned ministries needed • Better coordination among relevant government ministries and agencies on trade issues: action by government needed

  21. V. Conclusions and Recommendations • Better opportunities for CSO participation: action by MITM needed • Better feedback and input loops between CSOs and the private sector umbrella organisations on the one hand, and their constituencies on the other: action by private sector umbrella organizations and CSOs needed • Investment on knowledge and expertise building: action by all including development partners needed • Promotion of a culture of dialogue and inclusiveness: sustained efforts by all stakeholders needed

  22. Inclusiveness will generate national ownership which is the best guarantee for effective implementation of trade policy as part of overall development policy

More Related