1 / 11

Theories of IR: Realism

Theories of IR: Realism. PO 325: International Politics. Realism. Dim View of Human Nature (Hobbesian) States are the Central Actors: Little Real Influence Exerted by IGOs, NGOs, and Sub-State Actors. Realism. Centrality of Anarchy and the Maintenance of Sovereignty

zayit
Download Presentation

Theories of IR: Realism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Theories of IR: Realism PO 325: International Politics

  2. Realism • Dim View of Human Nature (Hobbesian) • States are the Central Actors: Little Real Influence Exerted by IGOs, NGOs, and Sub-State Actors

  3. Realism • Centrality of Anarchy and the Maintenance of Sovereignty • World Populated by Potential Conquerors in Search of Security • State Thus Seek to Gain Security/Maintain Sovereignty, Sometimes Through War and Conquest • This Notion Leads to the SECURITY DILEMMA – State’s Actions to Ensure Security Threatens Security of Other States, Whose Reactions In Turn Threaten the First State

  4. Realism • Rational Pursuit of Self-Interest • What is RATIONALITY? • Main Assumptions as Applied to IR • States are UNITARY ACTORS • States have COHERENT, DEFINABLE INTERESTS (can identify them and put priorities on them) • States make COST – BENEFIT CALCULATIONS • So, States as Coherent Entities Making Calculated Choices in a Unitary Fashion (Strong Leader) • Overarching Goal: Advance National Interest

  5. Realism • Because of Human Nature/State of International Affairs, No Place for Moral Considerations in IR (Diminishes Capacity to Attain Primary Goal)

  6. Realism • POWER • To Realists, Power is the Central Means of Gaining/Maintaining Security and Sovereignty in Anarchy • From IR Perspective, Power Can Only Be Had In Relation to Other States • Can Be Implemented Through Diplomacy and Bargaining, But These Are Useless Without Physical Capacity to Force Outcomes • Three General Strategies • Compellence: Force Others to Do What You Want Them to Do (ex: US – Iraq 2003) • Deterrence: Force Others to Refrain from Doing What You Don’t Want Them to Do (ex: Actions Prior to First Gulf War) • Reciprocity: Reward Compliance, Punish Non-Compliance (ex: US/USSR Nuclear Disarmament)

  7. Realism • Power Sources • Resources: Long-Term • Economics • Demographics • Credibility • Less Tangible Factors (Culture, Religion, Geopolitics, Education) • Power as Capability: Short-term Influence Capacity • Military Capabilities – size, composition, preparedness • Immediate Industrial Capacity to Produce Weaponry • Less Tangible Factors (Domestic Support, Loyalty) • Power of Ideas – Capacity to Make Power Fungible – Mobilization Capacity (Psychological Vehicles

  8. Realism • Power Relations: Structural Form and Systemic Stability Provide Framework For Interaction • Balance of Power • Best Way to Stop Aggression • Counterbalance Power of Potential Aggressors to Deter • Great Powers Often Band Together to Do So (ALLIANCES) • Relative Unimportance of Domestic Considerations • Realism Says that Alliances Will Hold Together Only As Long as Threat Persists (Is This Always So?) • Alternative – Bandwagoning

  9. Neorealism • Neorealism Proposes General Laws About Peace and War Based on Nature of Power Distribution Across System • Power, which is measured as the physical capability to exert influence (military, economic, and demographic), is not an end in and of itself, but a means by which to ensure sovereignty • Generally, states ensure survival by balancing against other powers

  10. Neorealism • States are functionally similar except in regards to capabilities (i.e., domestic factors do not matter) • For most neorealists, the most beneficial power distribution is bipolarity, as rival is apparent, importance of unreliable alliances is diminished, and engenders prudence (especially with nuclear weapons – MAD) [EX: Cold War]

  11. Other Theories Relating to Power Distribution • Some realists claim that a multipolar situation is most likely to lead to peace, as there are always enough states to counterbalance aggression (power parity) [EX: Post-Westphalia] • Others claim that, when one state has the preponderance of systemic power, it dominates the rules of interaction and institutes peace to maintain status quo (hegemonic stability theory) [EX: UK in 1800s, US after Cold War] • Some realists claim that the existence of powerful rivals to a hegemon makes war more likely (power transition theory) [EX: WWI]

More Related